Skip to main content

2019Dad posted:

Thanks Backstop. That is good info and all makes sense. My 2019 is my oldest, so this is all new to me. To boil it down, I guess what I'm asking is: I get that it's good for the RC to have a telephone call with a kid and say nice things, but do they do have calls with 100 kids in a class? 1000 kids? I have no idea of the scale of things.

Work hard until receiving an offer. Then work harder. 35 players will be at fall ball all believing they will be among the 18-20 who get reasonable playing time.

Backstop22 posted:

At a Stanford camp my 2017 attended, one of the main coaches said they have a database with as many as 500 Freshman and Sophomores on it based on questionnaires filled out by prospects, coach references, camp observations, etc.  He said they have to track such a large group because they cannot pursue early commitments because they cannot know if a Freshman can meet their academic criteria.  He said many of these kids will be "high follow" but they need to track a player's academic progress as the PSAT, SAT and ACT scores and transcripts come in to determine if they can even get in to the school before they really can "recruit" them.  That list gets cut and trimmed regularly until they find a match of academics and baseball ability.

Another high academic D3 told us their "high follow" list is over 200 players going into the Fall of the Senior year class because there is so much fall out from kids not being able to get admitted before they can even get them committed as baseball players. Then when they can get the kid through an early read from admissions, the recruit list is still around 25 players because kids will not get enough financial aid to afford the school (and no athletic money is available) or choose another public school.

For the D1s who secure early commitments, they must work from a smaller group and can be more selective in who they recruit.  The challenge for the elite programs is that they need to over recruit due to the loss of kids to the MLB draft.  UCLA has 12 commitments for 2017 including at least three kids identified as potential 1st round draft picks.

Outstanding follow up here by Backstop22

2019Dad posted:
StrainedOblique posted:

#1 assistant coach knocked it out of the park w/ this post. In my opinion,  based on my personal experience , The fundamental problem with recruiting is that parents and kids do not know how to gauge REAL interest .

 The simple answer to #1 assistant coaches question regarding being a RECRUIT is ' you gotta be on the ink board '

Each baseball department has a white ink board and on it our their recruits and commits for 2017 thru 2019 maybe 2020 if it's a powerhouse program (it's worth noting that these powerhouse top 25 Vandy, UCLA etc  Were done with 2017 recruiting class two years ago)  All the commits , Recruited ( offered ) & prospects  names are listed and categorized and organized on the board by position, Class ( graduation year ) , and ranking on the board. In other words under ' LHP' their might be 6 names . 2 commits and 4 prospects. These 'prospects' are ranked 1-4 . One being THEIR 1st choice and 4th being THEIR last.

There are 5 stages to the recruiting cycle :

1) Follow

2) high follow

3) Prospect

4) Recruit

5) Commit

Here is a breakdown of what that looks like:

FOLLOW : In programs data base. Possibly by way of info submitted by player. There may or may not be any notes on the player. Follows are on the email list to receive program updates, camp invites. etc. the FOLLOW data base is HUGE. A lot of names. Being in the FOLLOW data base does NOT define interest by the program.

HIGH FOLLOW : A player in the follow data base that they have seen play. They have notes on. A HIGH FOLLOW is basically the same as a FOLLOW but they've actually seen the player play.

PROSPECT : A player the college has seen play and is seriously considering OFFERING . The Recruiting coordinator has seen the player play, met the player, spoken with him,Requested transcripts / Standardized test scores ( ACT/ SAT ) and possibly spoken to HS coach or travel ball coach. There is discussion about a campus visit.

*The easiest way to tell if you are a PROSPECT and not a FOLLOW is the telephone. NCAA Recruiting coordinators CALL / TEXT prospects. They DO NOT call follows .

RECRUIT: A player that has visited the school and been OFFERED a guaranteed roster spot thru the spring of his freshman year. These offers usually involve baseball scholarship money.....but not always. Coastal Carolina won the NCAA college world series w/ 6 guys on the roster that were 'academic money' guys. It's important for parents and players to understand that most schools are NOT fully funded. The NCAA allows for 11.5 baseball scholarships maximum per Division 1 school. But out of 300 programs last year, only 50 were fully funded. Most schools are at 8.5 some at 5 or maybe 6.5

A recruit has an offer from the school he is considering and may be in negotiation w/ that school on the terms . These negotiations can last several months. With an offer being given  and the player not satisfied. The player generally says 'Thank you I'm flattered but I'm not quite ready to commit yet' and the school re-approaching the player a few months later with a better offer,

COMMIT: A player that has agreed to an offer. If baseball money is involved , the player will sign a binding letter of intent outlining contractually his commitment to the school. NLI's are fedex'd to recruits the 1st week in November before the players senior year.

 

The biggest hang up I've seen w/players and mostly parents is they can not differentiate between HIGH FOLLOW and PROSPECT. They assume because a program has not said NO that it indicates that they may still have interest. That is a fatal mistake. They never say no unless you ask. These coaches will tell you the truth if you ask. The problem is that 17 year old boys don't want to ask. And the parents should NEVER ask.

I tell guys to call the RC and ask this question: ' Where am I at on the 2017 board?' If the player does that, they'll get the truth.

Having watched my son go thru this process, I can firmly say that when a school wants your son to play for them they make their intention crystal CLEAR. There is absolutely no ambiguity whatsoever .

 

 

It is threads like this that demonstrate how great this board is. I don't know where else this type of information could be found.

Follow up questions for StrainedOblique and the other posters on this thread, specific to the bolded text above. Scenario is: player has sent an email and some videos to some schools that will be at or near events that player will play in over the summer. A couple of the RCs have arranged for the player to call them (through travel coach) and have had initial phone conversations with player (and in one case seemed to know an awful lot about the player). And they or their head coach will see him play this summer. So two questions:

(1) Really, that seems more like a high follow than a prospect, at least until they see him play . . . or would video be enough to put a kid into the "prospect" category?

(2) How many "prospects" will a D1 program have? 100? 200? 500? What is the reasonable range?

First off, it sounds like your 2019 is getting interest. The next step is to learn how to gauge the interest.

The arranged phone calls are definitely a good start. There are NCAA contact rules and if RC's are reaching out to make contact with your son , you have to view that as a positive .

There is a beginning, middle and end in the recruiting cycle. You are in the beginning.

They have to see your son play . In my opinion video does not count. Once they've seen him play , you will either hear back from the RC or you will not. Generally , silence means they are not ready to offer. Silence needs to be treated as a 'no' or not interested . That is IMO the most effective way to keep track of everything .

The first thing a RC asks a player he likes is " How are your grades/ test scores?" . When an NCAA school likes a player they do not dilly dally . They make their intentions clear right away. You will KNOW if your are a legit prospect . Trust me.

My son was offered by a D1 summer before his Junior year. He was not ready to commit . During his Jr year he had the initial offer from 1 school and was a legit prospect at 6 other schools. He was a prospect at an IVY and the RC texted or phoned him once a week like clockwork. Another school on the West Coast invited him on campus for a official visit . He did the visit and liked the school. During the visit the HC and his entire staff brought him into the athletic dept building and offered him.

Once again, there is no ambiguity whatsoever. If your son is a prospect at a school. You'll know!

The trick to this whole thing is to not waste time or energy worrying about schools that show initial interest then go silent. Always treat silence as a NO.

Also, CAST A WIDE NET : don't get caught up in D1, D2 or D3 . There are really great programs at the D3 level and really crappy programs at the D1 level. Have an open mind . Some of the best learning institutions in the country are at the D3 level. I have a friend who's son is a Sophomore at a D1 mid major in the mid-west . He's seen 12 AB's in 2 seasons. And he's ready to hang 'em up. Another friend who's son plays at a top D3 on the west coast. His son plays regularly and is currently very excited because this D3 school is on it's way to Appleton, Wisconsin for the D3 college world series. 

This whole thing is about finding the 'right fit'

As far as your question about the actual number of prospects a school may have , as backstop22 said it is going to vary by school. High academic schools cast a HUGE net. And unless your son projects for the 2019 MLB Draft don't waste your energy on the top 25-30 D1 powerhouse schools. Plus, their 2019 class is almost complete anyways.

Always remember the recruiting pecking order : Pitchers go first. Go look at a D1 roster. 1/2 the names are pitchers . They recruit the same way. 1/2 of the incoming class are pitchers. And for position players foot speed is golden. Position player has to break a 7 with his 60 time. A 6.8 , 6.9 will do if the bat plays. And the bat has to mash. They only recruit guys that hit the ball HARD

The best advice my son got about recruiting was "Don't commit to the school that likes you...commit to the school that Loves you" . He ended up committing to a mid-major High academic D1 school in the South that loved him.

That advise served him well

Last edited by StrainedOblique

Identified = We know who you are

When does he play? Come to our camp.

Evaluated = We are evaluating you

Show up at your games. Come specifically to see you play.

Interest = We are interested but have yet to make a decision based on many factors.

Contact is made to let you know they are interested. Relationship building takes place in case they decide you are a player they want to recruit. Things are said and done to keep you interested while they buy time on the decision process. Remember, what other players do can have an impact on what they do with you.

Recruited = We know who you are = We have evaluated you = We have moved past the interest phase = We are offering you what we are prepared to offer.

 

Thanks for the responses. Really good information -- the kind of thing that makes this site so valuable.

Just starting to cast the net, but it is wide at this point and includes a few D3s (and FWIW the D3s are kind of refreshing at this point in time, because they can email you right back and don't have to call somebody else to get you to try to call them). Though so far his outbound email communication has been aimed towards only those specific schools that will see him play this summer, or could see him play without too much trouble (he'll be in their neck of the woods). The only thing the video was designed to do was pique some interest, and hopefully they see him play and we'll see what's what. 

Agree with 2019Dad. This is really good information.

Bumping this thread to the top since we just crossed over the 9/1 date for 2020’s.

Getting on the radar or the Follow list seems to be the first step. Even though the rules have changed to 9/1, the follow list may have been in place for a year or more — especially for 2020’s and some 2021s that were in flight prior to this summers rule change.

I think of casting a wide net as a Venn Diagram. The player casts his net. The coaches cast theirs. The overlapping sets of the nets could be considered the sweet spot. Getting exposure in the sweet spot is the objective but that can be easier said than done.

Son (2021) attended two camps this fall and will play in 3 fall tournaments with the last being the Underclass in Fort Myers in early October. His travel program conducts a showcase style workout that we will use to get video of hitting and fielding skills that can be used to send out to coaches. Our plan is to use a combination of college camps, tournaments and the videos to help cast the net. I don’t know if it’s the best approach or not but it’s the one we are going with at the moment .

Is there a general timeframe for how long a coach will follow a player to watch them develop over the years? It’s been said that coaches used to watch players much longer prior to early recruiting becoming much more prominent. Is the rule change allowing more of that to happen again?

PlayWithEffort posted:

Agree with 2019Dad. This is really good information.

Bumping this thread to the top since we just crossed over the 9/1 date for 2020’s.

Getting on the radar or the Follow list seems to be the first step. Even though the rules have changed to 9/1, the follow list may have been in place for a year or more — especially for 2020’s and some 2021s that were in flight prior to this summers rule change.

I think of casting a wide net as a Venn Diagram. The player casts his net. The coaches cast theirs. The overlapping sets of the nets could be considered the sweet spot. Getting exposure in the sweet spot is the objective but that can be easier said than done.

Son (2021) attended two camps this fall and will play in 3 fall tournaments with the last being the Underclass in Fort Myers in early October. His travel program conducts a showcase style workout that we will use to get video of hitting and fielding skills that can be used to send out to coaches. Our plan is to use a combination of college camps, tournaments and the videos to help cast the net. I don’t know if it’s the best approach or not but it’s the one we are going with at the moment .

Is there a general timeframe for how long a coach will follow a player to watch them develop over the years? It’s been said that coaches used to watch players much longer prior to early recruiting becoming much more prominent. Is the rule change allowing more of that to happen again?

I think every school is different. Maybe also depends on the age of the recruit.  One school watched my son at least 6 times over 8-9 months and talked to him twice a month before they offered (and they offered a very strong percentage). Another watched him once.  He wasn’t even there to see our team, he just got there early and happened to see most of our game. He asked him to call after the game and then ask him to call again the next day and offered. 

We used the approach you are using (email videos, Camp’s, showcases. tournaments) , and it worked for us. Son had enough exposure and was able to find a school that feels like a fit right before Jr. year.

Thanks for bumping this PWE.

So 16 months have passed since I was asking some questions, and let me add that I think Strained Oblique nailed it with his description: "The easiest way to tell if you are a PROSPECT and not a FOLLOW is the telephone. NCAA Recruiting coordinators CALL / TEXT prospects. They DO NOT call follows." That is absolutely right. In addition, his advice to "Always treat silence as a NO" is spot on. That said, even if there is phone/text communication, it doesn't mean you are a RECRUIT. As Coach May noted, "Things are said and done to keep you interested while they buy time on the decision process."

Let me add that being invited for a UV means you're a PROSPECT but it does not necessarily mean you are a RECRUIT. In other words, you very well may not get an offer, particularly if the UV is early in the process for that particular school. See quote from Coach May above.

Can I just chime in here and say how remarkable it is that kids are getting full blown offers before Junior year. Those of you who share that experience have truly talented sons and I just shake my head in admiration when I read about your kids here. Some of your searches seem so orderly and finite, almost predictable. My two boys’ searches, even with plans in hand, have been nothing short of chaotic, with the younger boy’s search in a kind of limbo, despite the fact that he’s a better player than his older brother. 

 

Last edited by smokeminside
baseballhs posted:
PlayWithEffort posted:

Agree with 2019Dad. This is really good information.

Bumping this thread to the top since we just crossed over the 9/1 date for 2020’s.

Getting on the radar or the Follow list seems to be the first step. Even though the rules have changed to 9/1, the follow list may have been in place for a year or more — especially for 2020’s and some 2021s that were in flight prior to this summers rule change.

I think of casting a wide net as a Venn Diagram. The player casts his net. The coaches cast theirs. The overlapping sets of the nets could be considered the sweet spot. Getting exposure in the sweet spot is the objective but that can be easier said than done.

Son (2021) attended two camps this fall and will play in 3 fall tournaments with the last being the Underclass in Fort Myers in early October. His travel program conducts a showcase style workout that we will use to get video of hitting and fielding skills that can be used to send out to coaches. Our plan is to use a combination of college camps, tournaments and the videos to help cast the net. I don’t know if it’s the best approach or not but it’s the one we are going with at the moment .

Is there a general timeframe for how long a coach will follow a player to watch them develop over the years? It’s been said that coaches used to watch players much longer prior to early recruiting becoming much more prominent. Is the rule change allowing more of that to happen again?

I think every school is different. Maybe also depends on the age of the recruit.  One school watched my son at least 6 times over 8-9 months and talked to him twice a month before they offered (and they offered a very strong percentage). Another watched him once.  He wasn’t even there to see our team, he just got there early and happened to see most of our game. He asked him to call after the game and then ask him to call again the next day and offered. 

We used the approach you are using (email videos, Camp’s, showcases. tournaments) , and it worked for us. Son had enough exposure and was able to find a school that feels like a fit right before Jr. year.

Thanks. 

I guess it gets more difficult with the rule change. Prior to the change, communication would occur through the travel coach or some third party if coaches were interested.

Post rule change, I’ve noticed a change to the camps. The camps have added tours of facilities for their prospect camps. All attendees can go on the tour. However, a few players (2021s and younger) get a lot more attention than others. Their tour may take a bit longer or may be a bit ahead or behind the rest of the group.

It will be interesting to see (or hear) what work arounds are being utilized now that the rule change is in effect when you aren’t attending a camp.

Interesting this has been bumped.  I guess it's semantics.  Yes we all understand by the technical definition recruitment can only occur with an offer attached to it.  But doesn't it sound weird to say "ABC university is in the process of evaluating my son and waiting to see if their top prospects commit elsewhere before making an offer to him".  So if we are not to offend the sensibilities what do we say?   So my son has no offers at this point.  One school in particular seems to like her m more than others.  He has had contact, twitter follows, camp invite, UV invite (which we just did this past weekend) and a Junior day invite along with communication of a personal nature from the head coach on Sept 1.  This is footbll just for a disclaimer but same thing I assume.  So what shall we call this?   Let's play a game.  In one word what do you call that which I just described?

Interest

I always say this process is like dating in a lot of ways.  There can be interest from one side and not the other or from both sides.  It is just figuring out the interest level and if it is the same interest level.  Then if the interest is legitimate and a good fit but sometimes you can't figure that out without venturing deep into the relationship.

Signing the NLI is marriage but until then you can be engaged and there still be interest from someone else.  That makes things very complicated because it may be someone you are very interested in and could possibly be a better relationship but how you gauge that interest without conversations which are "not permitted due to a gentleman's agreement or unwritten rules."  When someone sends word that they are interested, you have to try to figure out their interest level.  Are they would like to date (walk-on), would have a spot for you in my life (preferred walk-on) or you are the one I just didn't say it or realize it early enough (scholarship) interest?  Trying to figure all of this out is mind boggling.  Then add into it that the divorce rate in college baseball is about the same as it is in real life 50%.  I say that because between those who leave their colleges and those who never really play to an extended level is about 50% by the numbers. 

How do you figure it all out?  Interest.

Sorry if that was long and confusing but it makes sense to me.  You have to gauge interest and figure out where you are comfortable at in the interest level.

Last edited by PitchingFan
2020dad posted:

Interesting this has been bumped.  I guess it's semantics.  Yes we all understand by the technical definition recruitment can only occur with an offer attached to it.  But doesn't it sound weird to say "ABC university is in the process of evaluating my son and waiting to see if their top prospects commit elsewhere before making an offer to him".  So if we are not to offend the sensibilities what do we say?   So my son has no offers at this point.  One school in particular seems to like her m more than others.  He has had contact, twitter follows, camp invite, UV invite (which we just did this past weekend) and a Junior day invite along with communication of a personal nature from the head coach on Sept 1.  This is footbll just for a disclaimer but same thing I assume.  So what shall we call this?   Let's play a game.  In one word what do you call that which I just described?

Yes, in one word he's being "recruited." Next step is for him to be "offered"!  

For the record I say 'looked at'.  Very careful not to use the 'r' word.  "He's being looked at by...". But point is I don't take issue like some do if a parent says 'recruited'.  To me splitting hairs like that is just pissing on your turf or something.  

Last edited by 2020dad
rynoattack posted:

I would say that if they are contacting your son, then they are recruiting him.  Doesn't mean he will ultimately get an offer, but if they are taking time out of their busy schedules to phone your son, reach out through other intermediaries, send emails, send texts, etc., then they are recruiting your son.

And if someone is upset over the term used, they have too much time on their hands.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×