Skip to main content

Reply to "Another "situation" discussion"

Originally Posted by cabbagedad:

 

-a ball hit not right at MIF will not get double play and winning run scores

-all infield in shrinks holes between IF's and any ball knocked down has a chance for force at home

 

The argument "for" infield in seems to make a stronger argument for infield at double-play depth.  

 - "A ball not hit at MIF would not get double play", but this ball wouldn't be fielded with infield-in anyway.  And with MIF back, maybe it would get the double play (it depends).

 - "A ball knocked down" with infield in might well have been a ball fielded cleanly (and double play) with MIF back.

 

And as you point out, having MIF back gives a better chance to catch short pop ups.

 

You didn't mention anything about the batter - was he a above average runner unlikely to be doubled-up?

×
×
×
×