It's definitely not a cookie-cutter program. It's also fair enough if someone doesn't want their pitcher involved. My point is more about research and the fact that this was apparently poorly done. I say apparently because it hasn't even been published yet so we can't see enough of the methodology to know what can be taken from it. However, someone who already had a bias against WB programs picked it up and ran with it. If you are truly on the fence and trying to make a decision, this study (at the very least, this study at this time) isn't worth considering in the equation.