What I care about is that you haven’t dismissed like some because of some kind of bias against me or some infantile resistance to change just because it’s change.
Maybe it's comments like this. Just because people don't agree with you, doesn't mean that their opinion about the change is infantile.
Interesting quote from the article you just posted:
"There's a whole other entity for balls and strikes: the Zone Evaluation system. That was put in every park in 2009 to replace QuesTec, and it measures practically every pitch called by an umpire; batted balls are discarded. Cameras record the pitch in flight more than 20 times before it reaches the plate.
As of mid-August, umpires were calling pitches correctly at an average rate of more than 95 percent,by the league's numbers. Marsh said about a dozen umpires had called every pitch in a game correctly."
More than 95% correct - according to the MLB evaluation of the umpires using the Zone Evaluation System. I'm pretty satisfied with 95% accuracy.
That whole article was “interesting”, but let’s not forget its 3 years old, and that MLB has replaced that system with something it feels is “better”. Why would they do that? Hmmmm.
In regard to this, if you read the article - and the quote from the article I posted above - you will see that the Zone Evaluation System IS the current system that replaced QuesTec in 2009. The 95% accuracy rate is using the current system (from 2009 thru 2012) that is still in place. The Zone Evaluation System uses PITCHf/x.
That is my last post here (I hope...Ugh...)