bballman posted:
I wasn't talking about your question to me being deceptive. I was talking about your response to KevinA being deceptive and dishonest. You said, and I quote, "They already use computers to do an ump’s job with IR, but you’re still watching.". That is simply a lie and deceptive. They use IR to review an umpire's decision, not take the place of an umpire's decision. That's what I was pointing out.
And maybe you ought to stop assuming what people's reasons and motivations are. Because you are WAY off base that fear has anything to do with it.
You’re using semantics to try to win an argument, but that’s OK. Yes, they use IR to review an already made decision, but what’s the difference if that decision gets overturned? When that happens the umpire’s decision is replaced.
And perhaps you might take your own advice about assuming what others’ reasons and motivations are.