At this point, whatever. You haven't pointed out anything to support how a computer zone helps the game. Only, how computerized the zone will be.
And, you have made up your mind that you want it. What's the difference? Nothing I have said seems to change your mind. You want computers, many don't. You don't like being challenged in the realm in which this discussion is being held: From an umpire's perspective, not some random fan's.
We look at what it takes away from the game which is a lot more than what it adds to the game. You look at one part of what it does for the game and even that is not welcomed by many, if not most, of those involved with the game.
Also, no one is cheating. The use of that word in this is absurd. Using what is accepted to call the game and define one's judgment is not cheating anything. In fact, it is curbing things in favor of the players since they don't live in a black and white world as computers do.