Skip to main content

Reply to "Hit or Filders Choice"

quote:
Yes, SAC bunt reach on fielder's choice.


JMoff, I always enjoy your analyses, and I'm thinking we may have had this discussion before ... but claiming that it's a SAC and an FC is a bit confusing, because one is an 0-0 and the other is an 0-1.

I think what you're saying is that it's a SAC, thus 0-0, and writing "FC" simply allows you to recall what happened as you look back over the book at a later date.

But from one purist to another, if he reaches first via SAC, the ONLY way he could have gotten there is precisely this type situation -- where a fielder made an unsuccessful attempt at another runner. So it kind of tells its own story.

Not a big deal, but it seems like listing both is extraneous -- and possibly confusing.

Maybe I'm missing something. Your thoughts?
Last edited by RPD
×
×
×
×