Skip to main content

Reply to "Now I've heard it all"

Well, let me see if I have this right.
The party of the first part is discontent over the party of the second part's actions.
The party of the second part has admitted said role in alleged dealings.
The party of the first part has alluded to conspiring to manipulate opponent’s mental and physical limitations through what is deemed inappropriate verbiage.
Meanwhile, the party of the second part is remorseful for actions of cerebral flatulation.
Wherein therefore, all parties are unsympathetic to the plight of all other party's parts.

By Jove, I think I've got it...the rain in Coppell stays mainly on the field. Big Grin
Last edited by collikar
×
×
×
×