Skip to main content

Reply to "Travel Ball - Good and Bad......."

quote:
Originally posted by Daque:
There are so many variables it is difficult to draw any reliable conclusions about the fate of 13 year old players. [.....] They are just too young yet to draw any meaningful conclusions.

Then:
quote:
The big factor is innate qualities, not learned skills.


Seems to me that these two statements are logically inconsistent. How can you be sure that the capability of an older player is mostly due to innate qualities if you can't recognize those innate qualities in him as a younger player? If the purported innate qualiites weren't apparent at an early age, isn't it equally plausible to believe those later displayed capabilites were learned rather than innate?
Last edited by 3FingeredGlove
×
×
×
×