Skip to main content

Reply to "UC Davis"

Lefty,

Pages20-21 and elsewhere clearly confirm the Head Coach reported the 2018 player information to his supervisor, likely an assistant AD in charge of baseball.

The report is conspicuously silent on the action/inaction of the superior who was alerted in January of 2018.

Rather the report comes back and concluded the coach should have done more without being clear on what “more”” should have been done, especially with the report confirming how problematic it would have been to get reliable information from the players.

To me, the HC did what he was mandated to do-communicate the information to the AD. It is a complete mystery why the report is completely silent on any AD culpability

The report clearly concluded the pattern of misconduct was  within the team without confirmation of coaching knowledge or tacit looking the other way.

So the apparently rogue players are reinstated and the HC loses his job. (Hopefully he gets his UCRS retirement)

Administration culpability-silent.

Last edited by infielddad
×
×
×
×