Assuming it's a choice between one of these two, which option is best for continuing player development:
-- A powerhouse team with good coaches that attracts so many players that even good kids spend a significant time on the bench;
-- A mediocre team where a good player would stand out and play just about every inning.
I guess the crux of the question is this: Is the most overriding factor determining a player's progression the amount of playing time he gets, or the quality of the coaching and practices?
Debate. Discuss.
LHPMom
Original Post