quote:
Originally posted by CoachB25:
Pic, I'm sorry I give that impression. If fact, nothing could be more from the truth. It is about the kids. However, they need a coach and not a buddy...
...Everything I type on this site is just my opinion. It is virtually worthless. I do appreciate a critique such as Starzz where valid points were made concerning my approach to discipline without personal attack.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
I appreciate the respectful tone of your message and it's measured and thoughtful construction.
Since the question is,
Coaching philosophy on discipline?, I voiced my opinion as others here have done.
That being said, your message delivers the template that most good programs operate under.
The question, as I see it is, who owns the responsibility or as we call it the "R". Is it the coaches or the players? In the military style system the players are responsible and are held so through their peers for the outcome of their decisions.
In most systems that are presented and supported as the traditional way of doing things...the coach(s) own the "R". In that philosophy the "system" is imposed on the players and it becomes a test of wills.
Actually you see that same exact philosophy here where the will of the so called monitors or "the establishment" is imposed rather then inclusively accomodated. And how could that be done?... maybe by offering to take polls on the inclusion of certain types of topics as voiced by those who actually used the site. But that's another discussion.
It just seems to me that one should consider the proposition,
As a coach, how do you see youself fitting into the team protrayed in the movie, "Sandlot" without distracting from the fun that those boys had together, and without any coaches? To my way of thinking, most of what has been done to the game of baseball by adults is completely remove the fun of it. IMO that's the reason most kids are turning away from it and moving to other sports. It in part is due to this overemphasis on "punishment" and "discipline" as if those are mutually exclusive events aside from how the game really functions to teach the players through their own commitment to it, and dealing with the frustration of it's designed in failure rate.
Personally I know it's one of the reasons my son decided to go the college he is attending, because having fun playing baseball was more important to him then being at some prestigious school being miserable.
Coaching is teaching, nothing more and nothing less. It is not about satisfying ones ego through the feats and exploits of players.
As a kid I played baseball for years with a group of guys in San Francisco, just like Joe DiMaggio did on the public baseball fields before there was any organized Little Leagues.
Playing baseball back then was about getting better, but having fun in that we, the players controlled every aspect of the game. Adults were only there sometimes to help umpire a game or offer transportation assistance if we were going to play a team from across the city.
It was only after the owners of the MLB signed the big TV and advertising contracts that baseball excluded the players. They delivered into the hands of others all the decisions which has been more about getting the $$$ from the pot, then caring about the game of baseball. As a result of that kind of thinking it forced the players to form the MLBPA.
That difference in philosophy, that marginalizes the players to performers for pay, and not partners in the game, IMO has changed the game from one with that quality of innocence to a corrupted circus of avarice...
As a result of this, the owners find themselves on a financial petard which they impaled themselves with with the circus they've created. The MLB is now moving to develope and sign players that will sign for much less money that are from as many different countries as is possible. By doing so they are creating a much more intense environment in the USA for means and methods of players to achieve parity with their offshore counterparts, and are going to have to be willing to accept the consequences in less playing slots and less money.
As a result, this has given rise to the BB promoters who promise meeting the perceived criteria to all parents of the new paradigm in the reality of worldwide competition. They also influence what you are doing in your programs, otherwise you would not be here looking for answers.
Whether you realize it or not this model of paid performers is putting a tremendous amount of pressure on coaches like you. The institution of baseball and its supporters are expecting you to deliver to them the next Willie Mays, or the next Sandy Koufax...but not just one at a time...but multiples of each.
That pressure is transmitted to you through the parents and the institutions of higher learning. You have to realize that your program is not just competing in your local league, but it is also competing with globalization of the game.
Thus it is driving players away from the poor programs into the baseball mills and creating the impressions to their parents that they must move to districts where the baseball programs are the primos in the country, or spend enormous sums of money on privateers.
For you to stay competitive and increase your effectiveness, old methods must be analyzed and new methods must be evaluated for their approach and results. You have a most difficult and thankless task ahead and I do not envy your job. I respect the time and effort it takes for a HS coach to deal with the implied pressure and the reality of dealing with the new paradigm in baseball.
You have my best wishes.