One cautionary note, though.
After 6 innings in the Wake game, UVA was up 15-2 and Hultzen was at 87 pitches. They sent him out for the 7th and he ended up at 106 on a mid-50's evening.
After 6 innings in the FSU game, UVA was up 13-0 (!) and Hultzen was at 98 pitches. They sent him out for the 7th and he ended up at 115 on a chilly, rainy day.
UVA has a history of taking bright young pitchers and grinding them into the ground by tournament time, and the cumulative effect over the years in a few cases has damaged players' draft status. As examples, Jacob Thompson went from projected 1st rounder to 5th rounder when his MPH dropped; Sean Doolittle, once a Clemens award finalist, also faded his junior year, ultimately gave up pitching and went pro as an offensive player.
It would be nice if UVA would learn from their history and take things a bit more carefully with Danny. I understand the desire to win and if the games had been on the line maybe you could justify it. But these games were blowouts. And it's a long season for a kid who's going to be asked to throw more than he has ever before.
UVA is extraordinarily deep in pitching. They have quality arms in the bullpen that they barely even use. I simply don't understand why they couldn't pull Hultzen after 6 and take a look at one of those guys early in the season when the opportunities presented, instead of risking wearing Danny down early.