I'm going to start by saying this post is in no way intended to tick off the good high school coaches. There are good high school coaches with contacts and pipelines to certain colleges. But a lot of high school coaches are coaching due to school and school district policy and politics. Unfortunately there are plenty of high school coaches (all sports) who are more familar with the Publishers Clearinghouse than the NCAA Clearinghouse. Fortunately it's not the case at our high school. We even have guidance counselors who specialize in potential college athletes who work with the high school and travel coaches.
I've been thinking about this for a while since college softball coaches look at high school softball as rec ball. A softball player has to play travel to get noticed. One of my son's friends travel s****r team does not let their players play for their high school team. They don't want the high school coach teaching them bad habits. Most hockey players are playing Junior A before playing college hockey. With AAU many basketball players are on the charts (ex: Hoop Scoop) before they hit high school. It came to mind again yesterday when he varsity s****r coach told me my son needs to get in a year round travel s****r team for college exposure (fat chance with baseball).
I believe high school sports are great. My daughter lettered in three sports in a large high school. My son is playing three as a freshman. There's something special about representing the community. I tell people playing school sports teaches time management. It demonstrates the ability to balance school and sports at the same time which matters to colleges. But is playing high school sports becoming irrelevant to getting to the next level? I see tournament ball and showcases taking baseball where softball has been for some time. Keep in mind when responding not every high school player with college potential has the pro scouts drooling and saying "you gotta go see this kid play".
Original Post