Skip to main content

Obviously, most all of us here have some very strong connection to baseball.  Many have kids who are currently deeply invested in the game.  We're very worried about summer ball, recruiting and scholarship issues, maintaining training regimens, inflated future college rosters and transfer issues, the draft, lack of pay for coaches and on and on.  It often feels bigger than life.  

Right now, there is something far bigger going on.  This virus is going to cause death and economic ruin like most of us have never experienced.  We live in a very large country with a very large population.  This is just the beginning - just a few of our many large cities have been hit particularly hard so far.  IMO, the cycle will last longer in our country than in others for this and many reasons.  Some here are mimicking the "cure can't be worse than the problem" motto.  Our healthcare system and supply pipeline is already pushed to the brink and we haven't scratched the surface on the peak of the pandemic.  As it is, we will see tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands die in the US in the next six months or so.  Many of us will not be able to be with loved ones as they perish alone.  Many will not even be able to attend their own loved one's funerals.  Throwing caution (and stay-in-place orders) to the wind in the interest of preventing some degree of economic and financial loss will, with certainty, cause the death rate to be far worse.  It's not as simple as saying "the cure can't be worse than the problem".

We need to shift our focus.  We need to start accepting that there will be no summer baseball.  Expanding programs and/or adding games in the fall is not realistic either.  No one is going to show up on their college campus in the Fall razor-sharp from game competition.  The only baseball-related silver lining is that the next realistic window of competitive baseball games to be played won't be until next Spring. 

This gives us time to pause and re-prioritize.  Time to focus on what is really important to us.  Time to see other aspects of life.  Time to recognize how fortunate we are that our sons are alive and healthy and we're still here to enjoy them for all of who they are, not just the baseball player.  Time to figure out how to help others in our communities.  Time to figure out how to contribute with efforts to keep fatalities as low as possible.  

It is not my intent to open up a thread to political debate.  Also, I know that this site can be a bit of a refuge and hopefully will continue to be.  We can escape, momentarily, from the escalating problems going on around us.  I'm not trying to discourage that.  I just think we need to come to grips with what we are dealing with, put things in proper perspective and put our best foot forward as human beings.  We'll need that from each other more than ever.

 

Last edited by cabbagedad
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Something to keep in mind. Sheltering-in-place isn't a means to defeat the virus, it isn't going to magically go away. We can only try to slow it's spread so the health care system isn't overwhelmed. I know a lot of people who have this misunderstanding around me. We are all, at some point, going to get this bug. There may be a lucky few who might make it to a vaccine without getting sick, but not many. So yeah, at some point we are all going to have to put on our big boy pants and get on with life alongside COVID-19. At least until there is a vaccine, which is at least a year (best case) away.

Then why is the IHME model having to be revised almost daily because the predictions (which are ruling our policy) have been so off on the high end? The government and people know that the clock is ticking. Things will be back to "normal" as in "open" by summer. Why? Because at some point the country will realize having 10 million and counting unemployed, savings, mortgage, etc ravaged is not sustainable. We will need to make a choice and keep on living. 

Take Oregon for instance. 4 million people. Look at IHME model. If they did NOTHING, no lockdown, they would lose an average of 2 more people as usual per day (compared to all deaths). With lockdown they are on average saving 2 deaths per day through May. Are 2 lives worth saving compared to zero? Of course, we don't want to lose anybody. But shut down an entire state for that statistic? Things aren't adding up. 

The CDC can't even explain how they came up with the 100-240k death projection anymore because all these models are screwed. We're punishing the country for basically 2-4 states that are really bad. 

As soon as the hydrochloro treatment numbers are federally looked at and approved for treatment (so far numbers from other countries are phenomenal) we will have relief until a vaccine.

Call me an optimist or crazy person, but I'm in the camp that we will be alright once May ends. You will see a social, emotional, societal revolt if we keep this up much longer. 

Our best bet is to look at other countries and see what is working. Sweden has only isolated the elderly and compromised population, everyone else goes about their business. Look at the numbers there. 

We need serology tests asap to see the real infected and antibody stats. Our best fight is herd immunity until a vaccine, and that doesn't work unless we go back to our normal routines. 

Keep looking at the IHME model for individual states, keep seeing the changes. 

 

 

Last edited by James G

I am not sure ventilator capacities will factor all that much into the final equation.  Depending on what study you believe, once a ventilator is needed you have somewhere between a coin flip best case scenario and a 90% chance of death.  If you take the average, 70% of patients who are put on a ventilator  will die.  The fight has to be won before the vent is needed.  The capacity issue that will matter is the cocktail of antiviral and antibacterial drugs that keep patients from getting sick enough to need mechanical breathing assistance.

SomeBaseballDad posted:

Something to keep in mind. Sheltering-in-place isn't a means to defeat the virus, it isn't going to magically go away. We can only try to slow it's spread so the health care system isn't overwhelmed. I know a lot of people who have this misunderstanding around me. We are all, at some point, going to get this bug. There may be a lucky few who might make it to a vaccine without getting sick, but not many. So yeah, at some point we are all going to have to put on our big boy pants and get on with life alongside COVID-19. At least until there is a vaccine, which is at least a year (best case) away.

Good post and very sobering.  We live in a state that in some parts are extremely overwhelmed, 1565 confirmed, 22 deaths in my county. Total in Florida, 9585 confirmed, 163 deaths. We stay in because our counties health system is overwhelmed. But because this is Florida, for many it's hard to stay indoors. We live our lives outside.  Every single day. 

James G posted:

Then why is the IHME model having to be revised almost daily because the predictions (which are ruling our policy) have been so off on the high end? The government and people know that the clock is ticking. Things will be back to "normal" as in "open" by summer. Why? Because at some point the country will realize having 10 million and counting unemployed, savings, mortgage, etc ravaged is not sustainable. We will need to make a choice and keep on living. 

Take Oregon for instance. 4 million people. Look at IHME model. If they did NOTHING, no lockdown, they would lose an average of 2 more people as usual per day (compared to all deaths). With lockdown they are on average saving 2 deaths per day through May. Are 2 lives worth saving compared to zero? Of course, we don't want to lose anybody. But shut down an entire state for that statistic? Things aren't adding up. 

The CDC can't even explain how they came up with the 100-240k death projection anymore because all these models are screwed. We're punishing the country for basically 2-4 states that are really bad. 

As soon as the hydrochloro treatment numbers are federally looked at and approved for treatment (so far numbers from other countries are phenomenal) we will have relief until a vaccine.

Call me an optimist or crazy person, but I'm in the camp that we will be alright once May ends. You will see a social, emotional, societal revolt if we keep this up much longer. 

Our best bet is to look at other countries and see what is working. Sweden has only isolated the elderly and compromised population, everyone else goes about their business. Look at the numbers there. 

We need serology tests asap to see the real infected and antibody stats. Our best fight is herd immunity until a vaccine, and that doesn't work unless we go back to our normal routines. 

Keep looking at the IHME model for individual states, keep seeing the changes. 

 

 

Problem really is, the left foot doesn't know what the right foot is doing. 

cabbagedad posted:

Obviously, most all of us here have some very strong connection to baseball.  Many have kids who are currently deeply invested in the game.  We're very worried about summer ball, recruiting and scholarship issues, maintaining training regimens, inflated future college rosters and transfer issues, the draft, lack of pay for coaches and on and on.  It often feels bigger than life.  

Right now, there is something far bigger going on.  This virus is going to cause death and economic ruin like most of us have never experienced.  We live in a very large country with a very large population.  This is just the beginning - just a few of our many large cities have been hit particularly hard so far.  IMO, the cycle will last longer in our country than in others for this and many reasons.  Some here are mimicking the "cure can't be worse than the problem" motto.  Our healthcare system and supply pipeline is already pushed to the brink and we haven't scratched the surface on the peak of the pandemic.  As it is, we will see tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands die in the US in the next six months or so.  Many of us will not be able to be with loved ones as they perish alone.  Many will not even be able to attend their own loved one's funerals.  Throwing caution (and stay-in-place orders) to the wind in the interest of preventing some degree of economic and financial loss will, with certainty, cause the death rate to be far worse.  It's not as simple as saying "the cure can't be worse than the problem".

We need to shift our focus.  We need to start accepting that there will be no summer baseball.  Expanding programs and/or adding games in the fall is not realistic either.  No one is going to show up on their college campus in the Fall razor-sharp from game competition.  The only baseball-related silver lining is that the next realistic window of competitive baseball games to be played won't be until next Spring. 

This gives us time to pause and re-prioritize.  Time to focus on what is really important to us.  Time to see other aspects of life.  Time to recognize how fortunate we are that our sons are alive and healthy and we're still here to enjoy them for all of who they are, not just the baseball player.  Time to figure out how to help others in our communities.  Time to figure out how to contribute with efforts to keep fatalities as low as possible.  

It is not my intent to open up a thread to political debate.  Also, I know that this site can be a bit of a refuge and hopefully will continue to be.  We can escape, momentarily, from the escalating problems going on around us.  I'm not trying to discourage that.  I just think we need to come to grips with what we are dealing with, put things in proper perspective and put our best foot forward as human beings.  We'll need that from each other more than ever.

 

This post has many great points for sure but it seems your overriding post has to do with facing the reality of no summer baseball and I read that as meaning no summer baseball leagues for college kids which seems to be topical today.  I have no opinion on that but I do think there will be opportunities depending on where you are in the country to see baseball in the late spring and summer.   

The only question I have is for the comment on the cure being worse than the disease. No one says its that simple but ask yourself this - when do you think it will be ok to start to return to normalcy?   Some will say not until there is a vaccine - that could be 18 months.  Those people have every right to think this and should stay isolated.   If the answer is not waiting till a vaccine -what is the right answer; two weeks after the peak in an area, 2 weeks after the peak in the country, 4,6,8 weeks after either?  Something different - when tests determine if you have the antibodies and 50% of an area has them?  If 75% of your community had the disease?  If you want to be honest and ask about the reality you have to confront this question and then think through all the ramifications around your answer.  It's not an easy decision and no two of us would have the same answer. 

I especially appreciate your comment about this not being a political thread.  This is not political and there are ample blogs to get the self-affirmation we need to support our political views.  This blog shouldn't be one of them.

The fact is we have to return to normal at some point and this is still going to be a threat.  It is going to have to come down to people who are at risk and immune compromised stay home.  Waivers will need to be available to those who feel they are at risk or a risk to others in terms of school, work, etc., but the general population has to go back at some point.  It's just a matter of how much damage has been done to the individuals, businesses, and overall economy when we do.

Gunner Mack Jr. posted

 

  If the answer is not waiting till a vaccine -what is the right answer; two weeks after the peak in an area, 2 weeks after the peak in the country, 4,6,8 weeks after either?  Something different - when tests determine if you have the antibodies and 50% of an area has them?  If 75% of your community had the disease?  

I understand that one of the hopes is this virus isn't prone mutation and will be in line with chickenpox, where you get it once and done. 

baseballhs posted:

The fact is we have to return to normal at some point and this is still going to be a threat.  It is going to have to come down to people who are at risk and immune compromised stay home.  Waivers will need to be available to those who feel they are at risk or a risk to others in terms of school, work, etc., but the general population has to go back at some point.  It's just a matter of how much damage has been done to the individuals, businesses, and overall economy when we do.

I think you are right, you can't have the whole country stay home for 16 months, but the problem is, how does it work in practice?  Restarting schools - but every kid with a high-risk person at home needs a waiver, how does that work?  How many waivers before it doesn't work?  Sending kids back to college - how do colleges manage if they have hundreds of sick students at once, which is probably what would happen?  What about high-risk teachers?  Coaches?

40% of Americans over the age of 20 are obese.  10% have diabetes, 33% have high blood pressure, 5% have COPD, 8% have asthma, 49% have heart disease, 15% have kidney disease.  21% are over the age of 60.  Who is not high-risk? 

I tried out on my son the idea that they should put all non-high-risk college-age people in large camps and just hope they all get the virus, and take care of them until (hopefully) they recover.  He didn't think much of the idea.  But, how else would you do it?

Last edited by anotherparent

I believe the US will be open for business this summer. There won’t be a choice. We can’t have 30%+ unemployment. We can’t have millions of people not capable of paying their bills and purchasing food. 40% of the country would have to use a credit card to handle a surprise $1,000 bill.

But it won’t be life as normal. It will be cautious. It will be like race cars following the pace car during a yellow caution flag. It will be work and go home if not work at home. Corporations have to be thinking right now how they can expand work at home.** Baseball will be considered nonessential. 

** When I came out of college it was unthinkable sales could be done without getting in front of the customer. Inside sales with online demos were unthinkable. By 1995 a lot of companies were doing it.

Last edited by RJM
Gunner Mack Jr. posted:
cabbagedad posted:

Obviously, most all of us here have some very strong connection to baseball.  Many have kids who are currently deeply invested in the game.  We're very worried about summer ball, recruiting and scholarship issues, maintaining training regimens, inflated future college rosters and transfer issues, the draft, lack of pay for coaches and on and on.  It often feels bigger than life.  

Right now, there is something far bigger going on.  This virus is going to cause death and economic ruin like most of us have never experienced.  We live in a very large country with a very large population.  This is just the beginning - just a few of our many large cities have been hit particularly hard so far.  IMO, the cycle will last longer in our country than in others for this and many reasons.  Some here are mimicking the "cure can't be worse than the problem" motto.  Our healthcare system and supply pipeline is already pushed to the brink and we haven't scratched the surface on the peak of the pandemic.  As it is, we will see tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands die in the US in the next six months or so.  Many of us will not be able to be with loved ones as they perish alone.  Many will not even be able to attend their own loved one's funerals.  Throwing caution (and stay-in-place orders) to the wind in the interest of preventing some degree of economic and financial loss will, with certainty, cause the death rate to be far worse.  It's not as simple as saying "the cure can't be worse than the problem".

We need to shift our focus.  We need to start accepting that there will be no summer baseball.  Expanding programs and/or adding games in the fall is not realistic either.  No one is going to show up on their college campus in the Fall razor-sharp from game competition.  The only baseball-related silver lining is that the next realistic window of competitive baseball games to be played won't be until next Spring. 

This gives us time to pause and re-prioritize.  Time to focus on what is really important to us.  Time to see other aspects of life.  Time to recognize how fortunate we are that our sons are alive and healthy and we're still here to enjoy them for all of who they are, not just the baseball player.  Time to figure out how to help others in our communities.  Time to figure out how to contribute with efforts to keep fatalities as low as possible.  

It is not my intent to open up a thread to political debate.  Also, I know that this site can be a bit of a refuge and hopefully will continue to be.  We can escape, momentarily, from the escalating problems going on around us.  I'm not trying to discourage that.  I just think we need to come to grips with what we are dealing with, put things in proper perspective and put our best foot forward as human beings.  We'll need that from each other more than ever.

 

This post has many great points for sure but it seems your overriding post has to do with facing the reality of no summer baseball and I read that as meaning no summer baseball leagues for college kids which seems to be topical today.  I have no opinion on that but I do think there will be opportunities depending on where you are in the country to see baseball in the late spring and summer.   

The only question I have is for the comment on the cure being worse than the disease. No one says its that simple but ask yourself this - when do you think it will be ok to start to return to normalcy?   Some will say not until there is a vaccine - that could be 18 months.  Those people have every right to think this and should stay isolated.   If the answer is not waiting till a vaccine -what is the right answer; two weeks after the peak in an area, 2 weeks after the peak in the country, 4,6,8 weeks after either?  Something different - when tests determine if you have the antibodies and 50% of an area has them?  If 75% of your community had the disease?  If you want to be honest and ask about the reality you have to confront this question and then think through all the ramifications around your answer.  It's not an easy decision and no two of us would have the same answer. 

I especially appreciate your comment about this not being a political thread.  This is not political and there are ample blogs to get the self-affirmation we need to support our political views.  This blog shouldn't be one of them.

Of course, this is all JMO and I am certainly not an expert but have been paying close attention to ALL the facts coming in, not just the viewpoints I prefer to believe or those with underlying motive.

I believe that "return to normalcy" will be as RJM states, a gradual step process.  But, we will need to go through more peaking first, which will bring on several new major crises.  We will need to work diligently to improve our situation with access to PPE's, ventilators, etc. This process will certainly be months, not weeks.  

We MAY find ourselves trying to open the country back up for SOME business mid-summer but it will be baby steps and very limited at the outset (and, BTW, restarting summer, college and HS baseball will certainly not be anywhere near the front of the line).

Anotherparent points to some excellent information about the overall health of Americans.  We are a nation with enormous numbers of "high risk" citizens.  Getting high schools and colleges back on track in the fall will require a HUGE undertaking.  The students themselves are not necessarily or relatively high risk but the teachers and staff they interact with as well as the families they go home to and the people at the places they congregate otherwise are another story.  We may or may not be ready to pull that off come fall.  

I believe we are going to have to collectively get our $hit together and a lot of things are going to have to go really right if we are going to be able to start recovery with these timeframes in mind.  It has been an awful long time since we as Americans have been able to come together and decide to pull in the same direction to accomplish such a feat.  I have seen some encouraging signs the last few weeks.  I also still see cavernous obstacles.

I am certainly hopeful.  I never wished more that my gut feeling and opinion would be wrong than with this. 

Last edited by cabbagedad

cabbagedad,

I'm right there with you.   This is a life altering occurrence that we won't get over for a long time.  I believe at last count we were a 330 million person country, and this is has absolutely stymied everything we do.   From my perspective, this is a terrible way for the "Greatest Generation" (as depicted by Tom Brokaw's book)   to go out, and we are pretty much powerless to help them.   We owe them so much.   BTW..I've been passing the time by burying myself in history and WWII documentaries.   My mother in law and my parents are left to fend for themselves and it tears me up everyday that I can't help them.

I'm a child of the cold war and the nuclear proliferation that carried over the 60s', 70's, 80's.   It is part of my psyche, and it has never left me.   I can still remember our classroom drills of getting under the desk.   Well, I think there is a new enemy, and there is no hiding.   Will it have a long-term effect on today's young people?  It certainly has most of our youth's short-term attention.   Until we have vaccines and ways to deal with the virus (and others like it) it is going to change our lives significantly.   MLB made some earlier statements about trying to salvage a 2020 season, because "there has always been baseball, even after 9/11".  I honestly don't see it happening.   I don't see any professional sports in 2020.    I know nobody wants to hear that.   I love sports as much as the next person.  But this virus brought us all back to the base of Maslow's hierarchy of needs...safety.   And frankly, that is where we need to be at this time.   Our government leaders got a very quick dose of reality.   It took a while, but they are on it and owning it now.   They have a tough job, and we've got to help the cause by staying home until the fridge is empty.

As RJM posted some of the business side effects of Covid-19.   I'm used to working at home when I'm not on an airplane going to meet my customers.   This is not a huge adjustment for me, but I know it is for a lot of people and their spouses.   This crisis is going to make or break some marriages.   I've heard some funny and not so funny stories about husband and wife working out of their homes with younger kids.   It is tough.   I used to dread working out of my house when my 3 sons were younger...it was never quiet.   My customers (large global 30 companies) have invested heavily in infrastructure to have their employees work from home.   I have 3 large "work-from-home" project implementations going on right now.    Many of these customers saw this possible virus event happening months ago and bought a solution accordingly.   So, tech supply chain took a hit because many companies are doing this, but it will slowly rebound.   The large companies have the resources to deal with this, but I'd worry about mid-sized businesses.  Just my experiences...

For recent college grads, I'm not sure what I'd say.  Yes it is disappointing to have to face this virus, but you've got to keep learning new things and skills.   They are young and they've got time on their side.   Possibly the answer for some is to pursue an advanced degree, or learn new skills that can be parlayed with their degrees.   Whatever they decide it isn't going to be easy for them or the rest of us.

As, always JMO.   Y'all be safe out there!

TPM posted:

Sorry I left out the BP! 

Broward here. How are things up there.

Quiet. Fields were “closed” this week. I know the parks and rec guy so we can still go to the cage and hit if my son doesn’t feel like hitting in the garage. Also have a mound in the backyard, so my son has invited a couple pitchers from his team to come throw pens this weekend. 
As far as the Covid, we only have 42 cases right now. Most of the county has been following the rules and even staying home for weeks now. The boating community, not so much. It should be a lot easier for us to slow the spread than it will be for Broward. 
How about down there? You guys seem to be doing better than Miami

fenwaysouth posted:

cabbagedad,

  I don't see any professional sports in 2020.    I know nobody wants to hear that.   I love sports as much as the next person.  But this virus brought us all back to the base of Maslow's hierarchy of needs...safety.   And frankly, that is where we need to be at this time.   Our government leaders got a very quick dose of reality.   It took a while, but they are on it and owning it now.   They have a tough job, and we've got to help the cause by staying home until the fridge is empty.

 

Had to look up Maslow's hierarchy to refresh memory - Safety is not defined solely by health but also by personal security, employment, and property.  10m currently unemployed, many more on the way, and potentially looking a financial ruin.  Glad there is fiscal help on the way for them.   

JMO - there will be professional sports and in the not too distant future.   As we go up the J curve its hard to see the other side but NYC/NY will be heading down the other side in a few weeks, the rest of the country not far behind that. 

Also, we have to help out our communities by spending if you can afford IMO.  Order take out, curbside pickups whatever you can do to help your community if you have the means.  

We have 1598 cases and 22 deaths in Broward.  It surged after spring break, which should have never happened.  Snowbirds went home as well as Canadians where I am.  Miami has almost 3000 cases but 11 deaths. Palm Beach has now surpassed Broward in deaths.  

Be careful. I have a theory that much more of us have been exposed than we know, just like any virus. 

Unfortunately, President Trump turned the word "flu" into a political firestorm. But please, how about a dose of reality? How many confirmed cases of COVID-19 today? 278,458? What's the current estimate for U.S. population? 330,536,464? How many hospital beds do we have in the country? Probably not enough. It's not cost effective.

Estimates of flu hospitalizations for every year since 2010 far exceed the total number of confirmed COVID-19 cases thus far. Now that doesn't mean I don't think COVID-19 isn't serious or less deadly than the flu; it just means we don't have enough data yet. Do I think COVID-19 numbers will trump (not intended as a pun) the flu number this year? Probably. But since we have destroyed the economy perhaps not. Of course only time (and data) will tell.

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html

The estimated range of flu deaths this season (since October 1st and through March 28) is 24,000 - 63,000. This number will certainly end up being less as we progress through the season for the simple reason being the same deaths that would normally be attributed to the flu will test positive for COVID-19. Which virus do you think will be listed on the death certificate as a contributor for the death?

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/...season-estimates.htm

So where were the CNN stories of flu deaths for this year's flu season? And all the past years? Reality is we lose thousands of citizens every year to this virus. And you know what? That's not going to change anytime soon. So when you hear the story about the young and otherwise healthy adult who just died of COVID-19 what do you think is the purpose of that story? Do you anyone with the same profile has also died of the flu? Of course! Where's that news story?

Do you think COVID-19 will be any different? Will it end up being like the flu? Very possible although SARS-1 doesn't seem to have gone that route.

So in the future when sports are back in full swing (who knows when that will be) will I give pause and think about whether the person next to me may have COVID-19? Probably about as much as I've thought about the possibility of people having the flu at every sporting event I've ever attended.

That's reality.

This may swim against the tide, but I'm not sure what the lesson of having a redo year really is. Don't get me wrong, I feel for all those graduating Seniors that won't get their "last time" in HS or College (sports, arts, etc.). What about those doctoral level grad school students - 7+ years of "college & grad school" and nothing. Some facing the prospect of working in a hospital. Still why do we single out athletes and let them have another "last time"? That will not necessarily translate further in life as I'm sure many can attest.

Life will not be the same for quite a while - will you go to a restaurant, a ball game, a concert, etc. and not want more space between you and the next person? In the end, it's about trust - do you trust that someone who is sick will self isolate? How many have been in an office, at a game, etc. listening to someone sneeze, sniffle, cough, etc.  With this virus you may not know you have it - it's very scary indeed. There was a story a couple weeks ago about a guy sneezing without covering his mouth, getting called out for it, and then threatening the person who called him out with a gun. Sorry - that's just nuts, but that's what we have to worry about when/if we do the same thing?!

Had to chuckle a bit at Fenway's make or break some marriages - it's so true - I remember what we went through when I started work at home 12+ years ago - great because I could easily sneak off to baseball, football, basketball with the boys, but bad because the guilt of sneaking off meant I worked longer hours and really never "left the office" which wasn't good for home life. It took a long time to fix and for me to figure out the correct work/life balance. The other side of the stay home will be the possible baby boom in 9 months, just hope it's not going to be a single parent boom.

Everyone stay safe - do the right thing. Find your own balance. Think of and thank those that are on front lines of this. You may not agree with every decision made, but assume good intent.

 

TPM posted:

We have 1598 cases and 22 deaths in Broward.  It surged after spring break, which should have never happened.  Snowbirds went home as well as Canadians where I am.  Miami has almost 3000 cases but 11 deaths. Palm Beach has now surpassed Broward in deaths.  

Be careful. I have a theory that much more of us have been exposed than we know, just like any virus. 

I agree. The number of infected has to be multiples of the reported numbers. If it is true, the country will recover much quicker. Hopefully, some of these experimental treatments will provide some relief to those suffering with more severe symptoms

Feb. 27:  https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/27...-outbrain/index.html

Feb. 21:  https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/21...eaths-105/index.html

Jan. 30:  https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/30...cted-trnd/index.html

We normally do nothing to mitigate the flu, except for advising handwashing; also, people get vaccinated.  With coronavirus, most places are trying social distancing, and that has brought the number down.  If it's below 100,000 that will be a great triumph.  I hope that naysayers won't conclude that means we shouldn't have taken all the measures that we have, it is exactly the opposite.

Last edited by anotherparent

Great resource someone just sent me which estimates peak for each state and the country as well as Bed and Ventilator needs.  Still personally analyzing but thought people would find interesting.  

http://covid19.healthdata.org/

NY State is 5 days from the peak and says it needs 10k ventilators in total.  This is wildly different than earlier projects.  For me, this site is worth watching at a min.

For our Florida posters, you are a month away still.   CT is 11 days away.  I think some of this might explain why many of us have different views on severity and duration.  Here is tri-state we've been under the assault of Covid-19 for a month and seeing estimates of peaks in 5-10 days is a green shoot.   In CT HS ends now on June 30th with peak mid-April - that is why I am optimistic "normalcy" (new normal)  is close to returning - up here.

Last edited by Gunner Mack Jr.
ABSORBER posted:

Unfortunately, President Trump turned the word "flu" into a political firestorm. But please, how about a dose of reality? How many confirmed cases of COVID-19 today? 278,458? What's the current estimate for U.S. population? 330,536,464? How many hospital beds do we have in the country? Probably not enough. It's not cost effective.

Estimates of flu hospitalizations for every year since 2010 far exceed the total number of confirmed COVID-19 cases thus far. Now that doesn't mean I don't think COVID-19 isn't serious or less deadly than the flu; it just means we don't have enough data yet. Do I think COVID-19 numbers will trump (not intended as a pun) the flu number this year? Probably. But since we have destroyed the economy perhaps not. Of course only time (and data) will tell.

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html

The estimated range of flu deaths this season (since October 1st and through March 28) is 24,000 - 63,000. This number will certainly end up being less as we progress through the season for the simple reason being the same deaths that would normally be attributed to the flu will test positive for COVID-19. Which virus do you think will be listed on the death certificate as a contributor for the death?

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/...season-estimates.htm

So where were the CNN stories of flu deaths for this year's flu season? And all the past years? Reality is we lose thousands of citizens every year to this virus. And you know what? That's not going to change anytime soon. So when you hear the story about the young and otherwise healthy adult who just died of COVID-19 what do you think is the purpose of that story? Do you anyone with the same profile has also died of the flu? Of course! Where's that news story?

Do you think COVID-19 will be any different? Will it end up being like the flu? Very possible although SARS-1 doesn't seem to have gone that route.

So in the future when sports are back in full swing (who knows when that will be) will I give pause and think about whether the person next to me may have COVID-19? Probably about as much as I've thought about the possibility of people having the flu at every sporting event I've ever attended.

That's reality.

People don't die from COVID19, they die from complications, usually being pneumonia, which is what is listed on the death certificate.  It's a highly contagious respitory disease, no vaccine like other strains, I know that you know that.

I know of elderly adults that have died from pneumonia caused by influenza A, B, C. I know of not one healthy adult who ever died from those strains of influenza. Not one.

I saw a story on CNN last night, heartbreaking. A healthy 42 year old healthy male with no pre existing conditions died from complications from this virus. What he went through described by his wife is unbelievable. More and more normally healthy adults and children have the virus. Let's not assume all who are dying are elderly or those with pre-existing conditions. 

And yes, I will think about who I am sitting next to when I attend any event, or standing in a line at the grocery store.

fenwaysouth posted:

cabbagedad,

 I'm used to working at home when I'm not on an airplane going to meet my customers.   This is not a huge adjustment for me, but I know it is for a lot of people and their spouses.   I've heard some funny and not so funny stories about husband and wife working out of their homes with younger kids.   It is tough.   I used to dread working out of my house when my 3 sons were younger...it was never quiet.   
 
 

My wife had worked from home for the last several years (probably about 3 days a week). We had her set up in the kitchen with access for her phone, computer, porch nearby for nice air etc. But now her "space" during the day (usually to an empty house other than cats) has become community, making it harder for her.  We gravitate to the kitchen when we are tired of OUR workspaces (my classroom is the dining room, my college sophomore's school learning location is in the basement and my ballplayer son's "workspace" is in the garage). Yeah, Zoom was novel at first, but I too am ready to move on, trying to be patient. I look for silver linings.. it sure is more comfortable wearing slippers when I teach.

For those who haven't, the Wikipedia article on the pandemic of 1918 - which burned through the world with little intervention - is interesting.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...#CITEREFBillings1997

Also, when testing results are showing 20% positives it means we don't have a clue on the spread through the population. When positive results get to South Korea's level (about 1%), then we have a handle.

 

Gunner Mack Jr. posted:

Great resource someone just sent me which estimates peak for each state and the country as well as Bed and Ventilator needs.  Still personally analyzing but thought people would find interesting.  

http://covid19.healthdata.org/

NY State is 5 days from the peak and says it needs 10k ventilators in total.  This is wildly different than earlier projects.  For me, this site is worth watching at a min.

For our Florida posters, you are a month away still.   CT is 11 days away.  I think some of this might explain why many of us have different views on severity and duration.  Here is tri-state we've been under the assault of Covid-19 for a month and seeing estimates of peaks in 5-10 days is a green shoot.   In CT HS ends now on June 30th with peak mid-April - that is why I am optimistic "normalcy" (new normal)  is close to returning - up here.

Thanks. Received this last night from another webster.

IMO a lot of the fear came from the medical community, and rightfully so, because the virus was so new they literally don’t know what to do with patients. There are no protocols, no true treatment plans.  We hear day after day about different options that doctors have tried that show promise but that’s not how medicine usually works. Doctors are not supposed to be “creative” with medications. You are just as likely to give a medication that tanks a patient as saves them.  So, again JMO, it will never be as bad as it is this time. Our scientists and medical community will have time to evaluate data and develop a plan.  FWIW, I have a longtime friend who works in the ER in Seattle area where Covid tore through the asst living home.  She’s a baseball (pitcher) mom and said this “The disease is some new pitch that rises when it should sink and throws 97, we’re just throwing our bat at it hoping to make contact”.  Stay safe everyone. Do what the experts tell us and, as maddening as they may be, enjoy having your family around you. 

TPM posted:
People don't die from COVID19, they die from complications, usually being pneumonia, which is what is listed on the death certificate.  It's a highly contagious respitory disease, no vaccine like other strains, I know that you know that.
 

I know of elderly adults that have died from pneumonia caused by influenza A, B, C. I know of not one healthy adult who ever died from those strains of influenza. Not one.

I saw a story on CNN last night, heartbreaking. A healthy 42 year old healthy male with no pre existing conditions died from complications from this virus. What he went through described by his wife is unbelievable. More and more normally healthy adults and children have the virus. Let's not assume all who are dying are elderly or those with pre-existing conditions. 

And yes, I will think about who I am sitting next to when I attend any event, or standing in a line at the grocery store.

People die of P&I, and yes, if they tested positive for a flu strain they are counted as a flu death. Currently, this number is way down because of COVID-19. It's going to be difficult to differentiate especially if they test for both viruses.

Again, there are plenty of otherwise healthy adults and children who die due to complications as a result of having the flu. Sometimes these stories appear locally but almost never nationally. These stories lead to mass hysteria but also serve to reinforce the stay-at-home message, especially to young, healthy people. Don't be confused by the motive.

You may not know of a single healthy adult dying from the flu yet it is estimated between 24,000 and 63,000 have died of the flu between October 1 and March 28. Using the low estimate that's a little more than 4000 per month. I would estimate ~ 10,000 since COVID-19's been in this country. That exceeds the count of COVID-19 deaths thus far but of course that's because COVID-19 has been ramping up and will certainly exceed that average. I can guarantee plenty of healthy folks are part of that 24,000. There are 162 child-deaths during that period:

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/

I don't know a single person who's died of COVID-19, healthy or otherwise. That doesn't mean they don't, per your argument.

And I am glad more people sitting next to me in the future will be wondering whether I have a virus; maybe they will wash their hands.

You're missing the point about flu.  There is a flu vaccine every year.  Some years more effective than others, but there is a vaccine.  People choose to take it, or not, that's on them.  They rarely publish numbers of how many people who died of the flu did or didn't have a shot, but my impression is that a large percentage did NOT have a shot.

There is no vaccine for coronavirus.  High-risk people can't choose to be vaccinated.

anotherparent posted:

You're missing the point about flu.  There is a flu vaccine every year.  Some years more effective than others, but there is a vaccine.  People choose to take it, or not, that's on them.  They rarely publish numbers of how many people who died of the flu did or didn't have a shot, but my impression is that a large percentage did NOT have a shot.

There is no vaccine for coronavirus.  High-risk people can't choose to be vaccinated.

The vaccine usually includes a few strains of various types of flu virus--totally a best guess as to what's going to be most prevalent for the prescribed year. Its not always correct. Folks 65+ are always at risk; it's one of the reasons pneumonia vaccinations are prescribed for that age group. It sounds as though they should be giving those out to more people, especially those who are high risk. But like the flu vaccine, different versions of the pneumonia vaccine handle between 13 and 23 variants of pneumonia-causing bacteria. They don't handle everything. And, as you suggested, not everyone actually takes them.

Last edited by ABSORBER

I am an optimist and so, I think we will turn the corner relatively soon.  I am teaching in another state and in our digital department meeting yesterday, most of the teachers in my department believe we will not go back to school this year.  I think we will be back though won't say when  

I know so many of the members here live in areas that are hotspots.  I live in Illinois and we have 31 cases in my county with zero deaths.  This morning, the wife and I drove 45 minutes to a vet clinic to get some medicine for one of our horses.  Our vet was out of this particular stuff.  That county doesn't have a case of the virus at all.  The vet there commented that the people he deals with are furious that they have to stay in when they have not had a case.  In fact, the are several counties in that area that do not have a case of the virus.  

I believe that with our national push to develop a vaccine and better treatments, we will overcome this.  On another website, I have two "Positive Threads" going.  That would be the only two positive threads in a huge number of negative threads put up daily.  

Stay safe!

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×