@Francis7 posted:His last travel team always impressed me. They had 16 on the roster and everyone except one was pretty talented.
(Story behind the one not so talented. The organization had an A and a B team for the 22's. And, he really should have been on the B squad. But, his mom threatened to pull him from the organization if he was on the B. So, the guys running it said "We will put him on the A squad but he will only play in an emergency or in blowouts." And, that's exactly what happened.)
The other impressive thing was that the other 15 all committed to play in college. Including my son, we had three D1s, two D2s, and ten D3s.
And, I saw that 12 of the 15 were all still with the schools that we knew where they were going.
Obviously this is in the past and I don't mean to pick you apart or divert the thread, but I do want to share something. The bolded should be a red flag for parents in a program like this.
If the program doesn't need this player - why keep him around? Answer - $$$. Another paying customer
If a program is willing to keep kids around because they don't want to lose out on a checkbook how honest are they when they assess your kid? Are they being honest about the coaching staff at a school and how your kid may actually fit in with their style or do they just want the "best" commitment for their Instagram page? How many of those 12 will be there next year? In two years?
Looking back - there were some schools that recruited mine that have since changed programs and are now coaching friends, former teammates, etc. From what they describe - mine likely would have been out of there at the end of the first semester - yet these were schools that were pushed on him/us by travel coaches and showcase promoters - who engaged in similar shady business practices.
