Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by lodi14:
I sure wished Anderson would fiqure out how to make that one in the -3 drop
Anderson has had -3 bats. What I heard was they didn't hold up. They dented too easily. They have a contract with some college with the 09 model. I'm guessing the program did some due diligence on the resiliency of the bat.

09 Pyrotech
quote:
Originally posted by lodi14:
RJM, we have a couple of Pyrotech. They are just not the same as the Techzilla.
-3's are not double wall bats. They would not meet BESR ratings if they were. As posted the first Anderson -3's were not durable bats. The impact on the bat from pitching velocity and bat speed at the high school and college level is much different than kiddie ball. There's a newly designed Pyrotech this year. I'm not endorsing it. I don't know enough about it. I'm stating it's available.

The way to drive a ball in high school and college is to get strong and increase bat speed rather than rely on the bat for spring.
The Techzilla brings back memories. My son was pitching in the LL regional championship. Had never given up a HR. He gave up 4 solo shots on swings that were sloooow. Practically bunts.

Dangerous bat.

Also saw a kid use one at big league dreams as a 13 year old. Hit it at least 350 feet. Using a little league bat. I have no idea how those bats were legal.
quote:
I have no idea how those bats were legal.
I talked with Steve Anderson once. I got to know him from another board. I think he explained this on a board too. The BPF and BESR tests are very flawed. Anderson did everything possible to meet the regulations but also provide a lot of pop in the bat.
Last edited by RJM

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×