Skip to main content

66 replies

Pitcher progression

Replies sorted oldest to newest

A adbono10,000+ posts

Coaches know that no pitcher is at top velo in January. But when evaluating a pitcher there is much more to consider than velo progression. Other things that can be evaluated at any time of the year are mental makeup, throwing mechanics, quality of secondary pitches, command of pitches (or lack thereof), body type, projection for growth, body language, work ethic, character (or lack thereof), overall athletic ability, coachability, academic standing, etc. However, all of those other things can’t be hyped up into a sales package and peddled on Twitter. So instead we get “velo dr” scam artists that have kids doing max effort pull downs  into a net (with radar gun measurements) in the dead of winter. All so they can post online how many kids are artificially hitting 90 (while they are being put at risk of injury). It’s all about these pretenders trying to build their brand on the back of unsuspecting HS players and naive parents who fall for it because they believe that velo trumps everything. And it doesn’t. Velo will open a door for you. But you don’t get to walk thru the doorway if you can’t stay healthy, throw strikes, and get outs. There is so much more to pitching than being able to throw hard. And I know this from personal experience. I was an exceptionally hard throwing RHP when I played. But at top velocity I couldn’t command my FB. I was completely ineffective until I learned how pitch. For me that meant figuring out how to command the FB at 90 (instead of max velo), developing a plus change up, and being able to throw any of my 3 pitches for a strike in any count. I didn’t put all of that together until the summer before my senior year in college. Players today don’t get the luxury of being given time to develop (unless they play D3) so you would think people would see the importance of overall development over just chasing velo numbers. But most don’t.

N nycdad10,000+ posts
@RJM posted:

Why is he doing a February showcase? Can’t these coaches see him pitch in June?

Most Northeast schools have camps in Feb. I would say for most kids preparing for the HS season, they should be ok throwing a 25 pitch bullpen in feb, they probably are in the training sessions anywyay.

When my son was going through this, there was one school on his list who had their camp in January, he wasn't ready by then and we didn't do it.

D 25Dad1,000+ posts
@Northeastmom posted:

My son is a high school player (co 2025). He had college coaches see him pitch at peak summer form and some will be seeing him again this weekend. His velo is the same despite his composition changing due to adding muscle. It’s only because of the time of the season. By mid spring to summer his pitching coaches expect to see his velo increase. He obviously isn’t looking at the increase he has had the last couple years, but 2-4 mph seems reasonable. I was just wondering how college coaches view that lack of velo jump in the off season. Also thank you!

I don't think they would look at it like that at all.  I also don't think they would ever look at a January velo in isolation.  I assume the July velos are his max velos from the summer, so good for him that those figures are now his starting point.  I think we all agree that the other factors matter, but velo is a quick gauge to for many to determine if learning more is worth it and gives you good insight on types of schools to focus your attention.  If your son gained weight/worked in the gym during the off season, I would note that progress as well since coaches really care about seeing that too.

MidAtlanticDadMidAtlanticDad10,000+ posts

My opinions on your specific questions, assuming you’re talking about a sophomore pitcher. I think most evaluators would assume that a healthy P is going to pick up some velo from Jan through April just due to getting in game shape. It’s not just the weather, pitching will make him stronger throughout the spring. JMO, but I don’t think an evaluator would put much weight on velo numbers from one 6 month period. So many other factors, including the sample size (many more pitches to measure in the summer than Jan). Did he play another sport during fall or winter? Did he have a growth spurt? Did he put on a bunch of muscle in the weight room? All things that would impact his velo in Jan. Now, if the kid has a full beard at age 16, and his body looks pretty much the same as it did a year ago, and his mechanics are good, then the evaluator might conclude that he's not going to add much more velo.

A adbono10,000+ posts
@RHP_Parent posted:

FWIW, according to my son, the number one metric correlated to velocity is a force-plate jump.  The more force a pitcher can produce, the greater energy can go into the pitch.  I don't understand it, but I'm reporting it

As with every metric there is more to the story than a number. The amount of force that a pitcher can produce from his post leg is important. But that force then needs to be transferred efficiently up thru the lower body, hips, shoulders & arm and ultimately to the baseball. Being able to produce a significant force doesn’t guarantee that any of the rest of that is going to happen. You also need proper and on time hip rotation, hip/shoulder separation, resistance from the stride leg in order to rotate over it, and a follow thru that keeps you in line with the target. That is an over-simplification. But I think you get the point.

N nycdad10,000+ posts
@adbono posted:

As with every metric there is more to the story than a number. The amount of force that a pitcher can produce from his post leg is important. But that force then needs to be transferred efficiently up thru the lower body, hips, shoulders & arm and ultimately to the baseball. Being able to produce a significant force doesn’t guarantee that any of the rest of that is going to happen. You also need proper and on time hip rotation, hip/shoulder separation, resistance from the stride leg in order to rotate over it, and a follow thru that keeps you in line with the target. That is an over-simplification. But I think you get the point.

This is why power lifters aren't baseball players....But I get what he's saying. There are also pro franchises that will base a days workout/life on things like vertical jump to gauge recovery and what you should you be doing in the weight room.

A adbono10,000+ posts
@RHP_Parent posted:

Oh, I agree there's a lot more to being a good pitcher, of course.  I think the original question was about how recruiters go about predicting velocity.  My son's understanding is that colleges or clubs like to use the force plate as a predictor.  Don't know if it is true, but that is what he thinks!

He can think that if he wants to. No harm in that. But I scout & recruit HS pitchers and I coach college pitchers. And I don’t look at force plate as a predictor of anything. Nor do any other college coaches that I know. Just sayin’….

A adbono10,000+ posts

There are a lot of people attempting to make a living in the youth baseball industry by pedaling questionable teaching aids, suspect theories, buzz words, and catch phrases to naive players and their parents. This includes the big name “scouting services” that put on high profile showcases, The chase for velo numbers is like a feeding frenzy. The social media competition is rat poison (to steal a line from Nick Saban). Never before have I seen so many players that throw hard but have not a clue how to pitch. And don’t care to learn.

TPMTPMHSBaseballweb Member since 2003

My understanding is that there is some merit to this theory.

A lot of hard throwers jump the highest and put the most force on the ground. It's not 100%.

The article states that there are other factors involved.

Traditionally the best athletes throw the hardest. That's never changed.

I am not sure what being for profit has to do with it,  just as I am not sure why it was brought up here.

So that we don't confuse those not involved with instructing, or new to the process, let's keep it simple.

FWIW I do believe there are a lot of hard throwers out there who do not know how to pitch. But there are new ideas and theories out there, just as the traditional ones, that do have merit,  so my advice is to find a qualified instructor that will work with your HS pitcher,  and stay away from the new age stuff.

JMO

JucoDadJucoDad5,000+ posts

The science for pitching and hitting mechanics continues to refine, but I agree with @adbono in that a lot of people are looking to make their living off youth baseball. There are lots of former college and pro ballplayer in that space because it's a good fit for their experience and a degree in sports management (or something similar).

While in HS during a Tom House camp and based on run-and-guns, Tom told my son he had the potential to reach 100mph or slightly above (he was a junior that touched 88 at the time). He was pretty dead on, how he knew that or if it was SWAG (scientific wild ass guess) based years of knowledge I have no clue.

I'll just add that arm care and strengthening the deceleration muscle groups is critically important. IMO, all this max effort all the time can't be good long term.

R RHP_Parent1,000+ posts

Just for clarity, my son is a junior D1 player.  He may not be thinking of high school velo.  And we never paid specifically for force-plate testing.  I think they do that testing at Cressey and other training facilities as a matter of course, and, for pitchers, I think "force into the ground" is the rationale.

Sorry, I wasn't trying to be controversial, but just reporting on something that my son mentioned.  Good luck to the OP's player this spring!

A adbono10,000+ posts
@RHP_Parent posted:

Just for clarity, my son is a junior D1 player.  He may not be thinking of high school velo.  And we never paid specifically for force-plate testing.  I think they do that testing at Cressey and other training facilities as a matter of course, and, for pitchers, I think "force into the ground" is the rationale.

Sorry, I wasn't trying to be controversial, but just reporting on something that my son mentioned.  Good luck to the OP's player this spring!

Since we are clarifying, I’m not saying that the amount of force a pitcher can produce out of his post leg isn’t significant. It is. There is just a lot more to it than that. Creating a lot of momentum begins with the post leg. No doubt about that. But there is a whole series of athletic movements that need to take place after the initial load to deliver a pitch with maximum force. So I look more at overall athleticism than anything else (when evaluating the potential of a HS pitcher). Your son is way beyond that kind of evaluation. But I still don’t buy that force plate metric is being used as the main velo predictor by MLB scouts and D1 coaches unless they are guys that never pitched and don’t really understand the kinetic chain. Just like a high EV in a cage setting doesn’t mean a kid is a good hitter. The same principle applies here. At least that’s my opinion.

Buckeye 2015Buckeye 201510,000+ posts

My son typically threw some all winter....then really started to ramp it up in January.  He did a February camp the winter before his junior year.  He was up to 86, which to that point was the hardest he had thrown (at least when there was radar).  There were 2 other guys there who had thrown 90-91 before.  They threw 85 and 86 that day.  A coach talked to my son and mentioned that if he was throwing what those guys were that he would expect him to be 90-ish by summer.  He actually hit 90 for the first time at the end of that Spring HS season.  I guess my point is that yes, the coaches were expecting a jump in the Spring/Summer, even though he had never been higher (and we certainly didn't tell them)

ClevelandDadClevelandDadHSBBWeb Administrator

Some questions for adbono albeit rhetorical questions in nature...

By today's "velocity" standards, were Tom Glavine and Greg Maddux hard throwers?  Jaime Moyer? I agree that Smotlzy had some giddyup on the ball but he obviously knew how to pitch as well.

The focus on velocity for kids makes no sense to me.  I agree kids now are throwing harder but at what cost?  How many are using "maximum effort" to achieve those velocities?  How many have control over those pitches (like you mentioned above) when they are "maxing out"? 

How about instead, a kid learns to throw with controlled effort based on whatever his God-given abilities are at that time.  Develops whatever his velocity is going to be over years while developing arm strength over time.  The priority shifts from velocity to a kid learning about pin-point location at every area of the strike zone (e.g., Maddux, Glavine).  Learning how to put a little on (because he has some left in the tank) and learning how to take a little off - all the while maintaining his control of the strike zone. 

N NY1,000+ posts
@ClevelandDad posted:

Some questions for adbono albeit rhetorical questions in nature...

By today's "velocity" standards, were Tom Glavine and Greg Maddux hard throwers?  Jaime Moyer? I agree that Smotlzy had some giddyup on the ball but he obviously knew how to pitch as well.

The focus on velocity for kids makes no sense to me.  I agree kids now are throwing harder but at what cost?  How many are using "maximum effort" to achieve those velocities?  How many have control over those pitches (like you mentioned above) when they are "maxing out"?

How about instead, a kid learns to throw with controlled effort based on whatever his God-given abilities are at that time.  Develops whatever his velocity is going to be over years while developing arm strength over time.  The priority shifts from velocity to a kid learning about pin-point location at every area of the strike zone (e.g., Maddux, Glavine).  Learning how to put a little on (because he has some left in the tank) and learning how to take a little off - all the while maintaining his control of the strike zone.

THIS IS GOLD!

A adbono10,000+ posts
@ClevelandDad posted:

Some questions for adbono albeit rhetorical questions in nature...

By today's "velocity" standards, were Tom Glavine and Greg Maddux hard throwers?  Jaime Moyer? I agree that Smotlzy had some giddyup on the ball but he obviously knew how to pitch as well.

The focus on velocity for kids makes no sense to me.  I agree kids now are throwing harder but at what cost?  How many are using "maximum effort" to achieve those velocities?  How many have control over those pitches (like you mentioned above) when they are "maxing out"?

How about instead, a kid learns to throw with controlled effort based on whatever his God-given abilities are at that time.  Develops whatever his velocity is going to be over years while developing arm strength over time.  The priority shifts from velocity to a kid learning about pin-point location at every area of the strike zone (e.g., Maddux, Glavine).  Learning how to put a little on (because he has some left in the tank) and learning how to take a little off - all the while maintaining his control of the strike zone.

I couldn’t have said it better myself. There are a lot of things that are contributing to the obsession with velocity. And few of them are good. First of all, today’s radar guns read hotter than the ones used back when the guys you mentioned were playing. Maddux could throw pretty hard when he wanted to. But he didn’t have to throw as hard as he could to get big league hitters out. I imagine he prolonged his career by taking the approach that he did. So while those guys weren’t regarded as hard throwers only Moyer was a soft tosser. To answer your question about commanding the baseball at max effort, not many kids can do that very well. And a radar gun reading on the ball right out of the hand on a full sprint pull down is not a FB velo. It’s an indication of potential but it often doesn’t transfer to the game mound.  Some of the biggest offenders are so called velo drs that conduct velo camps and post results on Twitter to create a bunch of hype. What they really are doing is building their brand on the backs of unsuspecting kids and parents. Some pitching clinics are pretty good, but for every good one there are 10 bad ones. PG, PBR, and VTool don’t help the cause. All they talk about is velo too. All of it is social media based and plays into the immediate gratification that young players want. And the “scouting reports” that are written for those orgs are not written by scouts. They are written by employees, some of which have no background in baseball. I heard a D1 RC from a school in Houston say something about this subject that I thought was profound. He said, “ kids today care more about getting likes and follows on social media than they care about what actual decision makers (that can alter the course of their lives) think.”
Velo can create opportunities. But if you can’t command the baseball that’s all it creates and they can go away quickly.  Nobody gives a tinker’s damn what the velo and spin rate are on ball 4. Except for the people that are taking your money in return for that data. The Baseball public has been brainwashed to believe that velo is the be all end all to pitching because that pitch can be parlayed into money. But it isn’t true (like so many other things we have all been told). Last weekend in a 3 game set (23 innings total) our JuCo pitching staff walked 25 batters, hit 4 more, and balked 4 times. That’s 33 free bases. By some miracle we won 2 of the 3 games, but the loss was a blowout. Our HC went ballistic on the PC and the pitching staff and asked me to come up with a plan on what to do. And I did. And it was a plan that focused on commanding the baseball, especially off speed pitches. Because hardly any 18-20 year pitchers that throw hard are very good at that. And I believe the reason that they aren’t is too much focus on velo at the expense of everything else that goes along with being an effective pitcher. But it looks good on Twitter!

ConsultantConsultant10,000+ posts
Adbono;
As a hitter, I can adjust to the "pure" fastball pitcher. Go deep in the
box and choke the bat.

On a "smart" pitcher who has extra fastball in his back pocket, there are
few adjustments to make except to "guess".
During the Braves successful years their pitching philosophy was consistent
from the ML tream to minors. Knowledge and intelligence over the radar gun.
Young pitchers today "study" the history of the great pitchers.
Bob

On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 3:05 PM HS Baseball Web <alerts@crowdstack.com>
wrote:
A adbono10,000+ posts
@Consultant posted:
Adbono;
As a hitter, I can adjust to the "pure" fastball pitcher. Go deep in the
box and choke the bat.

On a "smart" pitcher who has extra fastball in his back pocket, there are
few adjustments to make except to "guess".
During the Braves successful years their pitching philosophy was consistent
from the ML tream to minors. Knowledge and intelligence over the radar gun.
Young pitchers today "study" the history of the great pitchers.
Bob

On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 3:05 PM HS Baseball Web <alerts@crowdstack.com>
wrote:

Right on target, Bob. As usual.

N nycdad10,000+ posts

I think velo opens doors, and velo even opens doors that closed from not being able to command. Seems there are more coaches out there that view a wild hard thrower as someone they can teach to pitch vs. developing velo from a pitcher that gets outs....Have to throw 90+ to command 90+.

But I agree that you need more than velo and actually develop into a pitcher. My 2020 had good velo for his conference freshman year, but was wild. Second year developed his slider half way through the season and was getting outs, but velo dropped. He was let go. Schools liked his slider, but not a lot of options until his velo got back up.

I think the pendulum swung very far to the velo side over the last couple of years, and is swinging back more toward "pitchability" which is good. But I wouldn't want to mislead a kid throwing 80poo that as long as he gets out in HS and travel he's a D1 talent.

There are a lot of kids that post their hardest throw on Twitter,and there's a big difference between hitting a high number and being able to maintain/sit at that number.

There are also a lot of college coaches that will post platitudes about command and control on Twitter, and their first question to a kids's coach in private will be "What's his velo?"

I'm sure if you created two emails, and emailed coaches as a kid throwing 94 vs. 84, the 94 would get a lot more responses.

N Northeastmom1,000+ posts
@adbono posted:

I couldn’t have said it better myself. There are a lot of things that are contributing to the obsession with velocity. And few of them are good. First of all, today’s radar guns read hotter than the ones used back when the guys you mentioned were playing. Maddux could throw pretty hard when he wanted to. But he didn’t have to throw as hard as he could to get big league hitters out. I imagine he prolonged his career by taking the approach that he did. So while those guys weren’t regarded as hard throwers only Moyer was a soft tosser. To answer your question about commanding the baseball at max effort, not many kids can do that very well. And a radar gun reading on the ball right out of the hand on a full sprint pull down is not a FB velo. It’s an indication of potential but it often doesn’t transfer to the game mound.  Some of the biggest offenders are so called velo drs that conduct velo camps and post results on Twitter to create a bunch of hype. What they really are doing is building their brand on the backs of unsuspecting kids and parents. Some pitching clinics are pretty good, but for every good one there are 10 bad ones. PG, PBR, and VTool don’t help the cause. All they talk about is velo too. All of it is social media based and plays into the immediate gratification that young players want. And the “scouting reports” that are written for those orgs are not written by scouts. They are written by employees, some of which have no background in baseball. I heard a D1 RC from a school in Houston say something about this subject that I thought was profound. He said, “ kids today care more about getting likes and follows on social media than they care about what actual decision makers (that can alter the course of their lives) think.”
Velo can create opportunities. But if you can’t command the baseball that’s all it creates and they can go away quickly.  Nobody gives a tinker’s damn what the velo and spin rate are on ball 4. Except for the people that are taking your money in return for that data. The Baseball public has been brainwashed to believe that velo is the be all end all to pitching because that pitch can be parlayed into money. But it isn’t true (like so many other things we have all been told). Last weekend in a 3 game set (23 innings total) our JuCo pitching staff walked 25 batters, hit 4 more, and balked 4 times. That’s 33 free bases. By some miracle we won 2 of the 3 games, but the loss was a blowout. Our HC went ballistic on the PC and the pitching staff and asked me to come up with a plan on what to do. And I did. And it was a plan that focused on commanding the baseball, especially off speed pitches. Because hardly any 18-20 year pitchers that throw hard are very good at that. And I believe the reason that they aren’t is too much focus on velo at the expense of everything else that goes along with being an effective pitcher. But it looks good on Twitter!

Speaking of velo at a sprint, what does it say if a pitcher’s velo on those run and guns is basically the same as his mound velo? Is it that mechanics on the mound are actually getting him the velo, and on the run and gun he isn’t using mechanics to generate the same power? Or is it that he just isn’t athletic enough to figure out how to get power out of the run and gun? Or maybe lower potential for improving velo? Just curious. I know of a couple pitchers who have the same velo for run and guns. Others have a 5mph plus gap. My son is in between.

A adbono10,000+ posts
@Northeastmom posted:

Speaking of velo at a sprint, what does it say if a pitcher’s velo on those run and guns is basically the same as his mound velo? Is it that mechanics on the mound are actually getting him the velo, and on the run and gun he isn’t using mechanics to generate the same power? Or is it that he just isn’t athletic enough to figure out how to get power out of the run and gun? Or maybe lower potential for improving velo? Just curious. I know of a couple pitchers who have the same velo for run and guns. Others have a 5mph plus gap. My son is in between.

It’s rare (IMO) to see mound velo equal to run & gun. Usually run & gun is a measure of potential that can be achieved when a player is acting like an athlete and not thinking about mechanics. In a case where the velos are equal it’s an indication that a pitcher is being efficient with his delivery and is getting a lot of power out of his lower body - which is where most inefficiencies lie.

A adbono10,000+ posts

Pitchers that throw hard have always been awarded a badge of honor. That was true when I played 40 years ago and its true today. But it shouldn’t be that way tbh. And I say that as a guy that wore that badge. In college I pitched on a staff that had 3 guys make it to the big leagues. And 3 more that pitched in the minors. I threw harder than all of them. But was I a better pitcher than they were? Obviously I was not. I think the movie Moneyball did a great job of describing the archaic thinking of buying players vs buying wins - and in order to buy wins you need to buy runs. In order to do that well you have to understand where runs come from. And which players are really good at doing the things that produce runs. Starting with getting on base at a high percentage. At the MLB, Milb, and high D1 level I think similar principles are applied to pitching. But those principles are not applied to youth baseball. Up to and including most HS programs. All the things mentioned by @ClevelandDad are essential to being a good pitcher but there isn’t enough focus on teaching those things. Because people are more concerned about making money than teaching the game. That’s assuming they know how to teach it. When talking about teaching pitching I often compare it to a pie that has been cut into 6 or 8 pieces. You can find guys that can teach about 2 or 3 of the pieces. But it’s rare to find an instructor that can teach the whole pie. So most of them focus on velo. An exception is Tom House who I think does a great all around job of teaching pitching. I don’t agree with everything he says but he is very knowledgeable, very accessible, and shares information freely. His Team Mustard app is really good. With the pitchers that I coach, train, instruct, and advise I find myself being a counselor as much as anything.

N Northeastmom1,000+ posts
@adbono posted:

It’s rare (IMO) to see mound velo equal to run & gun. Usually run & gun is a measure of potential that can be achieved when a player is acting like an athlete and not thinking about mechanics. In a case where the velos are equal it’s an indication that a pitcher is being efficient with his delivery and is getting a lot of power out of his lower body - which is where most inefficiencies lie.

Interesting, thanks. Maybe a dumb question but is efficient delivery considered good? Or would a college coach rather have room to improve a pitcher? Just curious to understand.

A adbono10,000+ posts
@Northeastmom posted:

Interesting, thanks. Maybe a dumb question but is efficient delivery considered good? Or would a college coach rather have room to improve a pitcher? Just curious to understand.

Efficiency is not just good. It’s very good. Assuming we are defining efficiency the same way. I would define it as solid mechanics, with little to no wasted motion, no negative movements, and the ability to command the baseball. That is what all college coaches want. They would much rather recruit a pitcher that already has those traits than bring in someone they hope to teach them to.

N Northeastmom1,000+ posts
@adbono posted:

Efficiency is not just good. It’s very good. Assuming we are defining efficiency the same way. I would define it as solid mechanics, with little to no wasted motion, no negative movements, and the ability to command the baseball. That is what all college coaches want. They would much rather recruit a pitcher that already has those traits than bring in someone they hope to teach them to.

Thanks this is helpful.

TPMTPMHSBaseballweb Member since 2003
@CADad949 posted:

Unfortunately, I believe most, but not all, college coaches will take the kid that throws hard, believing they can teach him to throw strikes rather than take the strike thrower and help them develop the velo over time.

College coaches recruit all types of pitchers for their program. This might be an exception for the top 25 to 50 programs where usually top arms can hit triple digits.  And of course throwing heat from the left side is a bonus. You also have to have at least 2 or 3 more offerings to be successful. And be smart as well as athletic.

It's not just about the FB. Not just about how you perform but how you fit into the teams philosophy. You may not realize that while you are being recruited.

You do not have to throw hard to be a successful D1 college pitcher. One of my son's favorite guys while at FAU was a 6'5" lefty, now a 5yr grad who was in the low 80s as a frosh. I don't think he throws past 85 but with his devastating CB, deceptive slot he is a winner. He has won awards for his academic as well as athletic achievements. Hunter Cooley is his name. Has beaten the best of them in and out of conference.

As some of you know son is an assistant pitching coach at a P5. It takes a LOT of work to bring out a young pitchers potential.  Hours and hours. Some coaches are better at it than others and some players are better at embracing their role than others. You want your son to be a winner and have success both on the field and in the classroom.

C CADad949100+ posts
@TPM posted:

College coaches recruit all types of pitchers for their program. This might be an exception for the top 25 to 50 programs where usually top arms can hit triple digits.  And of course throwing heat from the left side is a bonus. You also have to have at least 2 or 3 more offerings to be successful. And be smart as well as athletic.

It's not just about the FB. Not just about how you perform but how you fit into the teams philosophy. You may not realize that while you are being recruited.

You do not have to throw hard to be a successful D1 college pitcher. One of my son's favorite guys while at FAU was a 6'5" lefty, now a 5yr grad who was in the low 80s as a frosh. I don't think he throws past 85 but with his devastating CB, deceptive slot he is a winner. He has won awards for his academic as well as athletic achievements. Hunter Cooley is his name. Has beaten the best of them in and out of conference.

As some of you know son is an assistant pitching coach at a P5. It takes a LOT of work to bring out a young pitchers potential.  Hours and hours. Some coaches are better at it than others and some players are better at embracing their role than others. You want your son to be a winner and have success both on the field and in the classroom.

You bring up some great points. My son is hs senior committed to a mid major. He’s 86-87 and fortunately, several of the points you made came to play in he recruitment.

I made the original comment because he was told that by many d1 coaches during the process. He be going into college at 17 so he’s got a lot of work ahead of him. I appreciate you sharing your knowledge and experience.

PitchingFanPitchingFan10,000+ posts

Dead on TPM.  I have said that some SEC schools told youngest son he was big enough or had enough velocity.  He fell into the right time, right place with UT (I give God credit).  He found a PC that loved lefties and wants velocity but also wants pitchability.  That is what gets son on the mound and has given him success.  He can throw 94 but it gets really flat and straight after 90 so coach says we want 86-89 with movement on everything.  Only throws fastball when he has to and normally 2 seam rather than 4 seam and lives off curve, slider, and changeup.  He can throw all for strikes in any count.  I've said I'm not sure if he gets recruited if at UT if he is on the market now with their success but he is still effective so who knows.  You have to do you and find that place that loves you.  Just like in life.  Do you and find the person who loves you.  (Taught that to our youth this past Wednesday night).  If you have to change you too much for them to love you it will probably not work out in the long run in baseball or life.

Last edited by PitchingFan
N Northeastmom1,000+ posts
@PitchingFan posted:

Dead on TPM.  I have said that some SEC schools told youngest son he was big enough or had enough velocity.  He fell into the right time, right place with UT (I give God credit).  He found a PC that loved lefties and wants velocity but also wants pitchability.  That is what gets son on the mound and has given him success.  He can throw 94 but it gets really flat and straight after 90 so coach says we want 86-89 with movement on everything.  Only throws fastball when he has to and normally 2 seam rather than 4 seam and lives off curve, slider, and changeup.  He can throw all for strikes in any count.  I've said I'm not sure if he gets recruited if at UT if he is on the market now with their success but he is still effective so who knows.  You have to do you and find that place that loves you.  Just like in life.  Do you and find the person who loves you.  (Taught that to our youth this past Wednesday night).  If you have to change you too much for them to love you it will probably not work out in the long run in baseball or life.

Great advice, and I’m about to ask in a new thread how a player knows a program loves him.

PitchingFanPitchingFan10,000+ posts

Time and money.  Same as life.  Want to know what is important to somebody look at their checkbook and their calendar.   When they show up at your games and they give you money out of their account.   Remember academic money cost them nothing.  

I had a gentleman that I am friends with that his grandson committed to a power five his freshman year as a preferred walk on. He showed up at campus this year and they acted like they didn’t know him. He ended up transferring to a mid major because the power  five brought in two portal guys and the commit has never played anything but catcher.   The P5 had nothing invested in him.

D 25Dad1,000+ posts

I agree with PitchingFan on time and money.  Both are pretty easy to quantify which make for an easy scale.  I would simply add a little more context that I took from my son's process that might be helpful.  

Who is spending their time?  Recruiting coordinators are certainly expected to spend their time on the recruiting trail.  Pitching coaches as well. If the head coach shows up, that is likely "love."

Where are they spending their time? The big PBR and PG tournaments are great, and an important part of the recruiting process.  Schools are attending those for a bunch of players, not just one player.  But, if they follow up and then show up at perhaps a random tournament/game that their school doesn't typically recruit from?  They are likely attending for just for one player, and that is likely "love."

As for money, beyond the size of the offer (and so many ways to think about that) is there no time limit on it? That is likely "love."

Does the offer increase as they get to see and know the player more? Again, likely "love."

A adbono10,000+ posts
@PitchingFan posted:

Time and money.  Same as life.  Want to know what is important to somebody look at their checkbook and their calendar.   When they show up at your games and they give you money out of their account.   Remember academic money cost them nothing.  

I had a gentleman that I am friends with that his grandson committed to a power five his freshman year as a preferred walk on. He showed up at campus this year and they acted like they didn’t know him. He ended up transferring to a mid major because the power  five brought in two portal guys and the commit has never played anything but catcher.   The P5 had nothing invested in him.

This is also spot on. As many posts in this thread are. Walk ons have been treated as you described since the beginning of time. The word “ preferred” placed in front often means nothing. The lure of being part of a sports team is being used as a means to generate tuition revenue for the schools, now more than ever. It’s almost always a mistake to turn down athletic scholarship money at a school to take a walk on offer at a perceived better program. The market usually will tell a player where they belong - be it D1, D2, D3, or NAIA. If you don’t like what the market is telling you coming out of HS, go JuCo and try to raise your stock value.

A adbono10,000+ posts
@JucoDad posted:

This^^^

And market will tell you where they belong coming out of JuCo as well. Got to love the grind to do two years of JuCo...

The JuCo grind will do more good for HS grads than being buried at the end of the bench for 2 years at a 4 year school. In so many ways. The harsh reality is that hardly any freshmen are emotionally ready for the demands of D1, D2, and NAIA programs. D3 is the exception as it’s way more player friendly. In warm weather states, where JuCo baseball is really good, it boggles my mind that it’s still looked at as a last resort by the uneducated masses. On many occasions at HS games I have had HS coaches (of not great teams) try to promote their senior backup players as JuCo prospects. When this occurs it’s inevitable after watching a few innings that I recognize that the starters ahead of these guys aren’t even good enough to play for us. I know it varies by location but if you live in Texas, Florida, California, Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arizona and aren’t looking at JuCo options you are making a mistake.

D Dadbelly20235,000+ posts
@adbono posted:

The JuCo grind will do more good for HS grads than being buried at the end of the bench for 2 years at a 4 year school. In so many ways. The harsh reality is that hardly any freshmen are emotionally ready for the demands of D1, D2, and NAIA programs. D3 is the exception as it’s way more player friendly. In warm weather states, where JuCo baseball is really good, it boggles my mind that it’s still looked at as a last resort by the uneducated masses. On many occasions at HS games I have had HS coaches (of not great teams) try to promote their senior backup players as JuCo prospects. When this occurs it’s inevitable after watching a few innings that I recognize that the starters ahead of these guys aren’t even good enough to play for us. I know it varies by location but if you live in Texas, Florida, California, Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arizona and aren’t looking at JuCo options you are making a mistake.

Where do you draw lines on this?  My 2025 is probably going to be a bubble D1 pitcher... but that's where he wants to be.  But he's an exceptional student and will graduate 3.9+/4.0 and SAT1500+/ACT34+.  I've started talking about the benefits of HA D3s and few better academic D2s but he wants zero part of the discussion. It's simply just not part of his or his travel teammates thought processes. Is JUCO the best route for him to meet this goal? How many students like that have you seen in JUCO?

N nycdad10,000+ posts

I'm sure I'm going to get some grief for this, but if your kid is getting 1500+/34 on SAT/ACT, the class workload at a JUCO isn't likely to challenge him, and in my opinion you want to surround yourself with people that'll will either push you, or be at your level. That's probably not going to be the case, academic wise at most JUCO. Obviously there are exceptions.

fenwaysouthfenwaysouth10,000+ posts
@nycdad posted:

I'm sure I'm going to get some grief for this, but if your kid is getting 1500+/34 on SAT/ACT, the class workload at a JUCO isn't likely to challenge him, and in my opinion you want to surround yourself with people that'll will either push you, or be at your level. That's probably not going to be the case, academic wise at most JUCO. Obviously there are exceptions.

Spot on @nycdad.   

@Dadbelly2023 - Keep working him over.   Take him to some college games, so he can see for himself the various levels.  Maybe the light bulb comes on that he is different from his travel teammates, and that is a good thing.  It  didn't take long for my son's light bulb to come on as he saw his travel teammates rush into committing.  My son was 2nd to last on his travel team to finally commit as they all went D1. Many didn't make it past their sophomore years at D1 P5s.  My son played all 4 years at a D1HA (mid-major), and the guy that was recruited after him had a great D1 at a mid-major career and got drafted.

They all go through a series of realizations and epiphanies.  Once your son realizes college baseball at any level is a great opportunity then you know he gets it.  They understand that they don't know everything and that Mom & Dad (may be uncool) but know a lot more about this stuff than previously thought possible.   Hang in there. Good luck!

Last edited by fenwaysouth
A adbono10,000+ posts
@Dadbelly2023 posted:

Where do you draw lines on this?  My 2025 is probably going to be a bubble D1 pitcher... but that's where he wants to be.  But he's an exceptional student and will graduate 3.9+/4.0 and SAT1500+/ACT34+.  I've started talking about the benefits of HA D3s and few better academic D2s but he wants zero part of the discussion. It's simply just not part of his or his travel teammates thought processes. Is JUCO the best route for him to meet this goal? How many students like that have you seen in JUCO?

  Okay, fair point. The JuCo route is rarely the best for HA students. There are some exceptions.
  However, I would contend that the biggest problem in the situation you described is the thinking of your son and his travel ball teammates. Without seeing them, I can say they are not realistic. After having watched them I would probably say that some are delusional. As a parent you walk a fine line between balancing what is real and supporting your son’s dreams. Unfortunately I feel that way too many parents fall off the balance beam on the wrong side of it. Way to many HS age travel ball players think (for whatever reason) that they are D1 talent and most of them are wrong.

D 25Dad1,000+ posts
@Dadbelly2023 posted:

Where do you draw lines on this?  My 2025 is probably going to be a bubble D1 pitcher... but that's where he wants to be.  But he's an exceptional student and will graduate 3.9+/4.0 and SAT1500+/ACT34+.  I've started talking about the benefits of HA D3s and few better academic D2s but he wants zero part of the discussion. It's simply just not part of his or his travel teammates thought processes. Is JUCO the best route for him to meet this goal? How many students like that have you seen in JUCO?

Many good recommendations so far which I will add a little to here.  Have him take a look at some of the recruiting over at Perfect Game's website for some D1 schools that he would be interested in.  Can he point out a number of pitchers from prior recruiting classes that have a similar profile to him?  How are those schools' 2025 commitments looking like so far (many of the stronger schools likely close to done)?  This summer will be in focus for the remainder of D1 schools to fill out the vast majority of their recruiting, with pitchers typically taking priority.  HA D3 would typically occur after that, but there is always some overlap.  He will want to start getting his name/stats/academics out to D1 schools if that is his goal, and if there is some/no response (through his club/HS coaches) then that would be telling.

I agree with others that this doesn't sound like a JUCO fit.

N Northeastmom1,000+ posts
@25Dad posted:

Many good recommendations so far which I will add a little to here.  Have him take a look at some of the recruiting over at Perfect Game's website for some D1 schools that he would be interested in.  Can he point out a number of pitchers from prior recruiting classes that have a similar profile to him?  How are those schools' 2025 commitments looking like so far (many of the stronger schools likely close to done)?  This summer will be in focus for the remainder of D1 schools to fill out the vast majority of their recruiting, with pitchers typically taking priority.  HA D3 would typically occur after that, but there is always some overlap.  He will want to start getting his name/stats/academics out to D1 schools if that is his goal, and if there is some/no response (through his club/HS coaches) then that would be telling.

I agree with others that this doesn't sound like a JUCO fit.

Not sure how many top d1’s are close to done with 2025’s. My son is looking at some pretty high d1’s that just wrapped up their 2024’s this fall. This summer will be their big summer for signing 2025’s, but they’ll likely take some after 9/1 too. I’m talking top 50 schools.

RJMRJMHSBaseballWeb member since 2007
@Dadbelly2023 posted:

Where do you draw lines on this?  My 2025 is probably going to be a bubble D1 pitcher... but that's where he wants to be.  But he's an exceptional student and will graduate 3.9+/4.0 and SAT1500+/ACT34+.  I've started talking about the benefits of HA D3s and few better academic D2s but he wants zero part of the discussion. It's simply just not part of his or his travel teammates thought processes. Is JUCO the best route for him to meet this goal? How many students like that have you seen in JUCO?

Don’t sacrifice the education of a top student. He can pitch for a ranked HA D3. With the right velocity he can get on a quality summer team with D1 players. If he dominates D3 he can always transfer up.

Last edited by RJM
JucoDadJucoDad5,000+ posts

There were some HA students in JuCo - they were the ones tutoring the rest of the team...

Kidding aside, the best advise I can give is to leverage baseball to get the best education possible. If it's all in on baseball, getting a transferable associates at a JuCo while clarifying next level fit makes a lot of financial sense.  After a couple years of JuCo the baseball ceiling becomes pretty clear for most all ballplayers.  

TPMTPMHSBaseballweb Member since 2003

According to a conversation that I have had with a mid D1 coach, JUCO is a great alternative for freshman athletes that need improvement on academics while needing improvement on their game.

I know from my own son that playing baseball and attending other sports at the school had to be a huge part of his college experience. I understand how @Dadbelly2023 son feels.  It's also dependent on the individuals career goals.

Also this discussion included how the D1 portal has changed recruiting. I see guys who began mid D1 now stars at big programs, or in reverse P5 D1 guys now at mid D1 programs who more than likely will play a lot more than at their first stop. I also am seeing many mid D1 players getting pre draft attention. They chose inexpensive state schools and played for 4, 5 years.

It's like a mixed bag out there but the player needs to find a starting point to begin the proper search.

2025s interested in D1 need to step up their recruiting NOW and be ready for this summer and fall. D2 is a great alternative, but many are very expensive.

If one has excellent grades, I agree JUCO more than likely not a good fit.

To my knowledge, D1 coaches in general do not recruit D3 transfers.

Add Reply

Post

Membership Required

We're sorry. You must be signed in to continue. Sign In or Register
×
Are you sure you want to remove from your Block List?
×
Loading...
×
When you block a person, they can no longer invite you to a private message or post to your profile wall. Replies and comments they make will be collapsed/hidden by default. Finally, you'll never receive email notifications about content they create or likes they designate for your content.
Note: if you proceed, you will no longer be following .
×
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Link copied to your clipboard.
×