dad1954,
Finally someone with a reasonalble question. I think at the College level most, but not all coaches,don't care either way. I have never heard one say to me that it will hurt the players chances to go on. I have however heard coaches speak highly of the 2 or 3 sport athlete. It tells them exactly that, they are a good athlete, and thats what they want...Keep in mind that a lot of these guys havent started to work yet. They will find out what it is to work when they get to school.(college)
I have found that often , not always , the football player in my dugout is the leader. Maybe its the makeup. Not saying that only football guys are like this, not true, but from experience that is something I have picked up on.
My Nephew is at NIU and was a hooper at West Aurora. I for one thought he should concentrate on his best sport and give the others up after his JR yr. What he chose to do was play basketball and as I look back on the experience he had as a kid (playing down state on a nationally ranked hoop team) was something you can never get again. It has changed my prospective on the 2 sport guys. He learned from the experience, maybe not how to throw , but he took something from it.
Keep things real. If he has the ablity to play he most likley will, regardless. The fact is most guys get strong in college because A) They are becoming men B) They will find out what it is to work.
My new found advise, be a high school athlete and let time run its course. On the flip side, he threw for me last Summer at 165 and after a couple early morning weights and running programs,(AT NIU) 190 pds and almost ready , if not ready to give them some innings. It has its pros and cons but I am for the kid be a high school student athlete first. Mike Bowden did ok for a 2 sport guy!