Skip to main content

I'm not quite sure how to start this thread. I want to get some opinions on the importance of a player playing the 'right' position and at what age that becomes important. At some point seemingly small nuances dictate how well a player does at a defensive position. Speed, armstrength, quickness, and so many other attributes all play a role on where a player is best suited.

Centerfielders are usually among the fastest on the field while rightfielders usually have arguably a stronger arm, for instance. I also always find it interesting how second basemen and shortstops often have somewhat different skillsets - from a baseball perspective - as players move up the competitive ranks. Although they are both middle infielders, sometimes even their comfort level/experience with playing the other position can play a role in how well they do defensively.

Recently, I've run into 3-4 kids that I used to coach that have settled on playing positions that, in my opinion, don't suit them as well as other positions they've played and I wonder if it may affect their ability to attract college interest.

For instance, I know a kid who has a good bad but isn't particularly fast. I think his best shot may be at first base but he is convinced he is a left fielder. He doesn't track the ball exceptionally well and is not that fast. His arm is good and he used to be really good at stretching/scooping at first. He has grown to be 6'2 and is maybe 175 at this point. I have seen this kid play at least a portion of 4-5 games each year over the last 4-5 years so it is not like I don't have a sense of how he has developed.

I know another kid who sees himself as a cf but I think could make a much better statement at 2b. He is fast and has a good arm but not cf speed in my opinion. Unfortunaltey he hasn't played 2b in 3-4 years so he is no longer comfortable in the infield.

A third kid is playing ss but makes a great cf. That is not a hard transition to make compared to some others.

None of these cases involve a situation where they were beat out of the position they once played. In each case I believe they could move back to their previous position and be much better than the kid on their team who is currently playing it.

Most of these kids are rising juniors now. I just wonder how thes choices might affect their recruitment. I am also aware that with work they could become as good at their current position as they were at their previous position, but I wanted some thoughts from others. Opinions?
Last edited {1}
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

One more thought. Many high school and college coaches have a 'the bat plays' philsophy and if your bat is hot they will find a spot for you. This leads to a 'best fit for the team' approach to defense, as it should be. How well a kid develops defensively is key here. I see this leading to kids reaching their defensive limitations sooner if they are not well placed.
Bill,
There are two active threads here in general items forum that touch quite heavily on this subject. Check them out.
They are titled "Most Difficult Positions" and "Help from coaches out there for rising sophomore".

That being said, a few things you said are particularly striking to me. You mention that "he is convinced he's a LF", "sees himself as a CF", "is playing ss but makes a great cf", etc.

Bottom line - this is a team sport with the primary objective being for the team to win. The coach of the team makes the decisions on who plays what position. The coach has to put the pieces of the puzzle together to give the team the best chance to win. Many times, that involves players playing positions that may not be their best or preferred position. He does not make that decision based on how it may affect their ability to attract college interest. And the players do not dictate what position they will play. Obviously, their abilities at a given position will influence the coach's decision, but the coach will decide based on team's needs.

Another thing you stated accurately says it all...
"This leads to a 'best fit for the team' approach to defense, as it should be."
100% correct.
Last edited by cabbagedad
In my somewhat limited direct experience with this issue as it applied to my son; the Coach recruiting or Scout will project your son where they see him fitting into their needs.

Example; my son was a first baseman, catcher but he was switched to the outfield the first day of Fall practices. He had never played a H.S. game at that position. Another school saw him fitting into their needs as a Catcher.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I agree that giving some consideration to what might be the best projectable position for a player is still a good exercise.
To the OP, I understand completely but from a parent's perspective. My son came up as a SS. His HS coach made him and OF. My problem is, son does not have CF speed, nor corner OF power. He is excellent defensively and, IMO, is best suited at 2B, but coach will never allow it.

As a coach, I think you need to put the players where you feel is best for your team. The player can use travel ball and showcases to play other positions. That is what we are planning on doing.
Like billbill said the bat plays... I've been a catcher since I was 6 years old. Ih high school I played 1 varsity inning at catcher and we were up 10 in the 7th inning of a tournament championship. I'm going to an NAIA school to catch, but in high school I played 3b, 2b, rf, lf, and played 1b this past season which was my senior year. A few of those positions don't quite fit a slow 6'0" 195lb player built like a catcher, but that doesn't quite matter as much as the at bats do. I'm not sure if you see those kids play fall and summer ball, but I'm sure they probably play their primary positions there.
Thanks, cabbagepatch. I've read through the two threads you described. If fact, the 'most difficult position' thread is the one that got me thinking about how to try to articulate my question. The 'Help from Coaches' seems to most directly address my question (just read that one today). The 'Most Difficult Position' maybe not so much but has a lot of good info.

I suppose a good coach/scout will be able to see their talents and project them into their position. I just wonder if by being somewhat misplaced defensively (in my view, anyway) they may be more easily overlooked as far as future opportunities are concerned. Thanks again.
Last edited by BillBill
quote:
Originally posted by Prime9:
In my somewhat limited direct experience with this issue as it applied to my son; the Coach recruiting or Scout will project your son where they see him fitting into their needs.


I think that says it best. You would be surprised how many players playing one position in HS do not end up in that position in college or in the pros.

The key is hitting, if you can, there will always be a place for you.

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×