Skip to main content

Young 2018 (june bday) had "high levels of physical projection remaining" outlined in his write-up from PG last summer.  This wording identifies strength in play (60, velo, etc), correct?  While he has only grown about an inch (maybe a tad more), he has increased substantially in all areas (almost half a second on 60, 10-12 on OF velo, 6-8 on FB velo, etc), so would this possibly play into additional projection/rating this year and since it was "high levels of physical projection" what increases would be the norm?  He went last August to a PG event and plans on going again this year as well.

Last edited by phillyinNJ
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

"high levels of physical projection remaining"

I translate this to mean that they see the kid with the potential to add physical size yet (i.e., he's not yet physically fully mature).

Now you can be left to read between the lines a million ways from there.  Does it mean that they consider him "small" today?  Does it mean that he's skinny and needs to add muscle? Does it mean that he's just not at the physical level of his peers?

Or, is he a stud now and only expected to get better as he adds height/weight?

Or, finally, do you simply take it at face value and see it as their way of saying the kid is expected to grow more.

Without the complete write up to provide full context, you're left to fill in the blanks.

Last edited by Nuke83
Nuke83 posted:

"high levels of physical projection remaining"

I translate this to mean that they see the kid with the potential to add physical size yet (i.e., he's not yet physically fully mature).

Now you can be left to read between the lines a million ways from there.  Does it mean that they consider him "small" today?  Does it mean that he's skinny and needs to add muscle? Does it mean that he's just not at the physical level of his peers?

Or, is he a stud now and only expected to get better as he adds height/weight?

Or, finally, do you simply take it at face value and see it as their way of saying the kid is expected to grow more.

Without the complete write up to provide full context, you're left to fill in the blanks.

I see your point...he was 6' 155 last year and 6'1 165 now...i guess we will see how it goes this year, but just wanted to see if there was more to it or not.

Nuke83 posted:

So at 6'1" and 165, even if he doesn't grow any taller, there is a lot of room on his frame to add muscle.  If he adds another inch or two, even more so.  Assume he tops at 6'2", he could easily get to 210# and remain very athletic.

My guess is this is what you can read between the lines.

ok...  was thinking maybe it was linked to the tangibles (which in a way i guess it is).  will be interesting to see what happens this year.  thanks!

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×