Skip to main content

I have seen a lot of slash bunting this year. It's interesting to me. We protect our catchers with sliding rules at home plate and don't allow base runners to run catchers over, but we still allow slash bunting. Back in my day (it was a while ago haha) slash bunting earned the player who slash bunted a baseball between the eyes in his next AB. I realize it puts the hitter at a disadvantage, but I have seen hitters slash bunt and turn on the ball. I wonder how long it will be before some INF is drilled before slash bunting is addressed. I understand the strategy, but i also understand the strategy of running that catcher over as well....just a thought

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Had several posts here regarding this strategy.....many say they are good with it, many don't like it at lower levels.  I agree with you that at the lower levels there are many rules in place to protect players.

 

My stance on the all out butcher boy play, I don't like it until the players are paid to play, or at least on scholarship.  

 

You will get others who are fine with the inherent risk.

Ok, I have never heard that called Slash bunting just slash.  I don't think there is anything wrong with it.  I see it used in Sac Bunt Situations when corners over crash.  I think its lame when it is used with nobody on because you have to square early,

 

Back Foot Slider you are stating that you only like it when they are getting paid to play?  So then I am supposed to let the corner infielders sit in the hitter's lap when he is trying to bunt?  You can't say it ok for the corner to crash in but the hitter can't slash.

Last edited by IEBSBL

I really think it depends on the level. I'm not a fan of the play on the smaller field. But when using BBCOR bats on the big diamond, where small ball is such a big part of the game, I differ with you, maybe just in terms of who is causing the risk. In a bunt situation, if F3 and F5 play in on the grass, and then crash all the way past the pitcher has he goes into his motion, I think the offense has to take what the defense is giving it, so they have to slash.

We had a long, occasionally heated thread on this not that long ago.  Subject wasn't just the butcher boy play, but teams that use the butcher boy multiple times throughout a game... Showing it, executing it, showing it as a fake, then squaring again and laying a bunt down, then back to it.  I haven't seen a team do this in a couple of seasons now.  I don't like it at HS level or below.  Team's shamelessly doing this repeatedly throughout a game are asking for retribution pitches, which I'm also against... in theory.

While I agree with R. Graham that it is used to keep a defense honest and i agree that it keeps infielders from crashing on the bunt play, that can also be achieved by not showing bunt prior to the pitcher getting set and showing bunt while in motion or just after the ball has been released. I was taught to show bunt during the wind up or after the release of the ball, and even in a sac situation, we didn't square up to bunt until wind up and we got bunts down on a regular basis. I have seen with regularity this season, pitcher comes set, batter squares to bunt, pitcher delivers the ball, batter pulls back to hit. I get the strategy, I just think its dangerous

Truth is - the only thing that makes this play "dangerous" is a corner infielder defending it improperly.

 

Anyone who has been properly coached is told to "creep", not "crash" until the ball is bunted.  If you don't want a kid to get hurt then teach the game correctly - don't handcuff an offense to accommodate poor fundamentals by the defense.

Originally Posted by R.Graham:

Truth is - the only thing that makes this play "dangerous" is a corner infielder defending it improperly.

 

Anyone who has been properly coached is told to "creep", not "crash" until the ball is bunted.  If you don't want a kid to get hurt then teach the game correctly - don't handcuff an offense to accommodate poor fundamentals by the defense.

We tell our corners to crash.  In my experience, corners generally react too late on bunt attempts.

 

If we tell our corners to creep instead of crash, we're going to have tentative corners when batters square to bunt.  We need the opposite.

 

Maybe it's a regional thing.  In my neck of the woods, bunt/slash is really rare.  Not worth worrying about from the defensive standpoint.

 

 

 

 

Last edited by freddy77

Just got back from the Arkansas v Virginia regional final.  There were no less than a half dozen square and bunt attempts.  Corners crept to about 75 feet away (maybe 3 steps onto the grass) and froze until the pitch was delivered.

 

So as I said previously, teams that are "properly" coached do it that way.  Although I am quite sure it is improperly coached much more often and hence, this discussion.

Originally Posted by R.Graham:

Just got back from the Arkansas v Virginia regional final.  There were no less than a half dozen square and bunt attempts.  Corners crept to about 75 feet away (maybe 3 steps onto the grass) and froze until the pitch was delivered.

 

.

Cal Ripken doesn't mention creep and freeze.  He wants them in motion--a "controlled charge".  Here's a screenshot from his "Get Great" segment on mlb.com

 

The first baseman is in motion, almost even with the mound--way more than 3 steps onto the grass--just at the instant of bunt contact (R2 is still frozen in his secondary lead.)

Attachments

Images (1)
  • chargingonabunt2

I think you guys are oversimplifying how "easy" it is for bunt coverage....especially as it relates to HS baseball, and especially below.  You can't assume all teams are created equal, with top of the line talent at every position, again especially at HS and below.  Are there some HS conferences that all teams are top notch...you bet, but there are far more that are not.  You get a team that had 14 kids show up to HS tryout, and a "not so nimble" corner creeping, crashing, flying, call it whatever you want, and have a very good hitter, with great bat speed, square around, and then take an all out hack at the ball....I am sorry, but if you are even with the mound, which is about where you should be before he pulls back, you may not have the reaction time to catch a bullet coming back at you.  An Ichiro slash, ok - not so dangerous, but a pull back, and swing for the fence, and the only way you are stopping the ball is if you are lucky and the "ball catches your glove"....

 

Anyone who has pitched, and been buzzed by a 90MPH+ shot coming back at you, would appreciate what you are up against. 

backfoot,

Apologies for repeating myself, but around here virtually nobody bunt/slashes.  Fastpitch, yes; baseball, no.   Moreover,  in the rare event that somebody attempted it, and in the further rare event that it resulted in a missile launched at one of my corners....they're not in any more risk on that hyper-rare play than my pitcher is on every single pitch of the game.

Last edited by freddy77

freddy,

 

I agree pitchers are at risk every pitch, but I don't think the risk / reward, no matter how rare is worth the potential consequences on the bunt play.  Hitting a missile up the middle happens, but not many parents will be upset at the hitter if it does...BTW maybe not at all that rare...BFS Jr. left a game on a stretcher two years ago after taking one to the head from the mound.

 

I would not feel very good about it if I was the hitter, or parent of the hitter, or coach, if a kid was drawn in for the sole& intentional purpose to pull hit a line drive at a virtually defenseless infielder.  The "butcher boy" play is cut and clear as to what the intent is, to pull a line drive by the 3B or 1B.......a random ball hit up the middle at the pitcher, is just that....a random occurrence.

Last edited by Back foot slider

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×