Skip to main content

We just played at a tournament and they were using the Stalker radar guns to rate the pitchers. Quite a few people were commenting that the Stalker guns gave a slower reading than the "Jugs" guns. Does anyone know if there realy is a difference and why there would be 3-5 mph drop? If so, which gun is more acurate from what we see at the major league games?

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Stalker guns read 5 mph low. So do Jugs. That's the opinion of most kids being gunned for the first time Smile

---

Modern Jugs and Stalkers read about the same. This subject has been discussed many times here over the years. Look up "stalker" in the "find" feature.

Major league and D-1 college scouts tend to use Stalkers. Stalker is considered the gold standard. HSs and smaller colleges often use Jugs which are a bit cheaper and lighter weight,
Angle plays a minor role. Sampling rate plays a bigger role. (guns send out radar pulses that may pick up a pitch right out of the hand or 10 feet out) Guns may deteriorate with age. Software varies with vintage. Guns may be less than perfectly linear. That is, a gun may be on the mark at 70 mph, but off at 90 mph)

I think Jugs are only rated at an accuracy of 1 mph plus/minus.

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×