Skip to main content

Article on them cutting pay of scout 57%…

The McCourts were never really accepted here for many reasons…Particularly when you compare them to Atre Moreno (of the Angels) who bought the team about the same time as the McCourts. Dodger fans are going to be in for a long, long drawn out mess. Hopefully the team is sold to another owner quickly, however I fear a repeat of the Padres.

When you read about all the stuff in their divorce filings and then read this it makes you want to puke.

http://www.latimes.com/sports/...v12,0,1411816.column
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The trouble for scouts like that is that they love the game so much that its known that they'll work for practically nothing. Same thing with minor leaguers working for starvation wages. All while these rich jerks fight over millions. Makes you almost want the lawyers to get it all but the only people who will suffer will be Dodger fans and people like the scout in the story. I guess the gamble for these old scouts is that since their time in the Majors was short, they never had a chance to work at a job where there's a pension involved.
Baseball is a tough game and at times a heartless game. It seems that any other scout would have been cut off completely.

I don't think it is just the Dodgers. More money is being poured into overseas development than here at home by the MLB.

While the RBI program is nice, it is little more than a veiled attempt to develop memnbers of 20% of the population.

Scouts have admitted that oftentimes they would just take in the various showcases, read evalutions and ocasionally stop in to see propsects before making their reports.

The whole purpose of the 'scout' was to find the 'diamond in rough', the standout player that nobody has paid attention to. If he finds and delivers talent, he should be compensated. If he doesn't deliver, should he paid anyway?

It would be interesting if the scout recieved a certain per centage of each player signed. Say 5% of the signing bonus separate from what is paid to the player. Similar to foreign scouts and players.
Last edited by Quincy
quote:
Originally posted by CADad:
This scout's salary was in essence a working pension.


Thanks...As obvious as it seems now, I didn't pick up on that originally. There has always been some undercurrent of baseball people taking care of their own, not that it's universal, but certainly not obscure either.

I would bet that these owners were told of the tradition of taking care of their old and faithful scouts, with the pittance of a salary they get, but these owners decided to turn their backs on them.

Judging from the comments here, and the way they seemingly conduct themselves, I shouldn't be surprised.
Last edited by CPLZ
Here is an updated article from the LA Times this morning. This is just confirmation on what many of us thought was going on with the Dodgers. Here is a franchise that should only be second to the Yankees and the McCourts are running this storied club into the ground so they can finance their lavish lifestyle. (Now their attorneys) No offense to the Minnesota Twins but the Dodgers have a smaller payroll than them! Let’s hope this nightmare ends soon and the court awards joint custody and the McCourts are forced to sell it to an owner who can take over and develop the team into what it should be.

http://www.latimes.com/sports/...0,6434159,full.story

Some snipits.

LA HoldCo's net losses for the first 11 months of 2008 and 2009 were $15.5 million and $5.9 million, respectively. Its $20.6 million in cash and liquid assets at the beginning of 2008 had dwindled to $5.5 million as of Nov. 30, 2009 — a 73% decline in less than two years.

The holding company went into technical default on its bank line of credit after the second quarter of 2009, because the cash available to pay its debts was less than required. The banks could have shut down the credit line at that point but did not, financial reports show.

In a court declaration, Wilhelm, the Dodgers' CFO, identified "borrowed funds" as the primary source for the "operation of the business enterprise as well as a source of potential distributions" to the McCourts.

The McCourts took $108 million in personal distributions from the Dodgers from 2004 to 2009, primarily from the borrowed funds, court records show.

For example, in 2006, Blue Land Co. — the McCourt entity that owns the Dodger Stadium parking lots — took out a $60-million loan against the parking lots, according to Wilhelm's declaration. The McCourts invested $10 million in the Dodgers and used about $50 million for personal mortgages and purchases of residential real estate, Wilhelm said.

The money to repay that loan comes from the rent payments the Dodgers charge themselves on land they own, shifting team revenue to the Blue Land entity, according to Wilhelm's deposition.

In his declaration, Wilhelm said he was aware of only two McCourt business assets that had been sold to generate funds for the Dodgers organization in the last six years — the sale of a Boston commercial building for about $3.9 million, and the sale of the minor league Vero Beach Dodgers for about $3.1 million.

In 2008, the McCourts were told that the sale of a minority ownership stake in the Dodgers could raise "a significant amount of money," according to an e-mail from McCourt Group Chief Operating Officer Jeff Ingram.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BOF:
Let’s hope this nightmare ends soon and the court awards joint custody and the McCourts are forced to sell it to an owner who can take over and develop the team into what it should be.

Amen to that! I was originally hoping that Frank would win out and retain sole ownership. However, after reading the article, I'm with you...hopefully the judge awards the team to both of them, which forces them to ultimately have to sell. What a mess!
BOF,
I admire your stand but I've got a couple games left from my mini package. Can I please go to the games? I promise to bring my own water so as not to support the McCourts any more than necessary. I don't think I'll go as far as parking outside the lots and walking in despite the ridiculous parking fees. Smile
In the 6 or 7 years I've known a fair number of scouts in our area, I've seen scenarios not too different from this one play out...from a lot of the teams. Its not unique to the Dodgers (the scout thing).

Our good friend bbscout wasn't always appreciated like he should have been.

Its a tough, tough business for everyone involved. (Note...everyone!). You have to love it to stay in it.
Last edited by justbaseball

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×