Tired of MLB players not knowing how to teach fundamentals

I always felt that there is more than one way of being a good hitter--there is not just one method

Approach to Hitting

Not sure how many times you posted, (nor why), yet check this out (or not)

Bear you have a PM.

Bear:
By "working together" do you mean that the hips and hands start at the same time?

Isn't that the question here? Whether the hips start before the hands, or the hands start before the hips.

"Working together" is vague and ill-defined. I could argue that the hips and hands could be working together whether the hands go first or the hips go first.

So are you saying that they should start at the same time?

I find this a very interesing issue. I'm no hitting expert or even particularly knowledgable about hitting mechanincs, so I am a good layperson to ask clarifiying questions about stuff that gets bogged down in jargon.

Sam1234 posted two videos with distinctly contrary views as to whether hips go forst or hands go first. The second video goes so far as to say that hips first is an "absolute" to good hitting.

So my question is more or less one that could be empirically answered: do the overwhelming majority of good hitters fire hips before hands or hands before hips?

Or is this not an absolute at all, which means empirical evidence would show good hitters doing it both ways.

I think this is interesting, because unlike a lot of other p**sing contests on the hitting forum, this one could actually be empirically proven, seems to me.

One other thing - question for sam1234 -

I played back the John Mallee video a few times. Right at initiation of the swing, where he says the swing should be from the "ground up, foot, knee, hips, hands last" -

Guess what the video shows? The hitter's knee and hips start moving exactly at the same time the hands start moving!

Play it back yourself! Either this hitter is not a good example of what Mallee is trying to say is an absolute, or it actually isn't really an absolute.

Looks to me like this hitter starts his hands at the same time as the back knee and hip, just like it seem Bear is arguing.

Thoughts?

I can't watch youtube videos at school so I can't comment on them. I will try to remember them when I get home and check them out then. But I would like to comment on Rob's questions / comments with my philosophy.

I'm a "swing from the ground up" guy and that's what I teach. But I also believe that the separation of movements is so minute that it really a non-issue if the hands move when the feet move at same time. I teach it more from a generating power point of view.

Which is stronger - legs or arms? I teach my guys to think bottom up because the bigger / stronger parts of the body will get the smaller / not as strong (because you don't want weak) parts of the body moving.

Another aspect which I teach to build upon the generating power aspect is that really the whole body is connected. Therefore the hands are connected to the feet which are connected to the hips. Think of it like there is a chain with no slack in it connected all the parts of the body. When one part moves the rest of the body has to move. So after trigger / stride (whatever you want to call it) anything that happens creates the whole body movement. If you want to start the hands then the hips and feet need to start moving. If you want to start the hips then the hands and feet better be moving as well. If you want to start the feet then the hips and hands better be moving too.

You can say "separate this and that" or "start this and that" but if you have a good swing then it looks like all the parts are working together at the same time. Slumps or bad at bats come from one aspect of the swing being a little too fast or a little too slow.

I also agree this can be a great topic with great discussion as long as it doesn't turn into who has the biggest nose competition. I rarely come to the hitting forum because I hate trying to explain what I teach (and know how successful it is) just to have someone tell me how dumb I am because I don't teach it their way. TRHit said it best in his response - there is more than one way to be a good hitter. I'll just add to his sentiment that there is more than one way to be a good ANYTHING.

Rob Ellis teaches the hands lead the hips (The Mike Schmidt Study). Says the swing is slow with the opposite key. I agree they are usually simultaneous.

That is not important though. The hitter who believes the hands lead the swing may put himself in a better position to hit. I would never correct a major league hitter of 10 years on that point.

A hitter who has a dead lower body may need to be told the lower body leads the swing.

When you hit, you really don't think about either. This would be more of practice keys anyway. I've never seen a sport that demands absolutes that don't seem to exist like baseball.

Here are my absolutes to hitting.
1. Player must not be seated nor standing on his hands.
2. He must use an approved bat.
3. To keep hitting in any league (except little league, etc.) he must make some contact.
4. Mass x velocity has something to do with hitting far.

quote:

Mass x velocity-SQUARED has something to do with hitting far.

Corrected it for you!

Some time back, someone posted a thread about the coach who "fixed" the swings of Carew, Musial, and several other HOF guys who had approaches that would be pooh-poohed by gurus today. It was a hoot.

I think fundamentals are especially needed by those of us who are mere mortals in terms of our athleticism -- we cannot succeed without perfecting technique. But there are super humans out there who hit despite developing cranky habits, and to them, any departure is a case of messing with success, which they wouldn't do.

I also think that the basics of eye-hand coordination improve with repetition. Thus, a guy who has what some might think is a bad swing can often have success if he just practices it enough. In the final analysis, it's all about putting the sweet spot on the ball.

quote:

Originally posted by baseballpapa:
Rob Ellis teaches the hands lead the hips...

I never could quite understand how Ellis and Schmidt got connected.

Sure, it may have been thru baseball, but jeez, we are speaking about a HoF who pretty much drastically tweaked his approach to the plate, almost yearly.

As compared to an intense first round guy, who never left the yard in the bigs, and had a career .229 BA, yet he got there (yet for three years, not ten as mis-stated)!

I think you may have mis-interpreted what Ellis was trying to say.

Bottom Line: In many many circles, the lower half starts before the upper half. But then again, to reach some type of understanding, terms must be precise, understood by many, & agreed to for comprehensive.

I am not interested in a pe^ing approach/contest, at least not before the Flomax kicks in.

Rob,

The back knee piches in before the hands begin to start forward. That is what John is talking about.

John Mallee is a finalist to replace Rudy as the Texas Rangers hitting coach. That is why I put his video up. He knows his stuff.

I get tired of people saying, that just because this person played in the bigs, he knows his stuff. He was talented, but some ex-big leaguers, "just did it." They didn't understand the workings of the swing. They just had a great natural ability to hit a baseball. It is far different to be a great teacher, than just a great hitter.

Below is a link to a slide show of Albert Pujoles. Look at slides 11 - 13. These show clearly, the hips leading the hands.

http://www.chrisoleary.com/pro...HomeRunSwing_001.pdf

One of the greatest hitting teachers in the game, also happened to be one of the greatest hitters in the game.

Another great hitting teacher also had his own hitting absolutes.

And yes, Rudy has been and will continue to be a pretty good hitting teacher.

Bottom Line: I like Chris O'Leary's reports. On both pitching and hitting. On Pujols I observe different things then your conclusions.

I see Pujols lower half leading his upper half. (slide 1 thru 10).
I also observe some hand movement beginning in slide 8.

I also see this terrific hitter having his hips and hands work together, thru contact and follow thru.

QED

Hip Bones Connected to the Back Bone Let's all sit by the fire, sing cum-bay-ya, drink and eat

When I was in high school I worked with a hitting coach who numerous professional hitters seek advice from for their swings and he taught me 4 things:
1. Before you can hit you have to load
2. Get your foot down early (earlier is better than later to allow you to read the pitch)
3. Your body should move like it does in a golf swing
a. you start back and you move to the ball
b. once you begin to swing your hips rotate
4. Always keep your hands inside of the ball (hit the middle to left part of the baseball; even on inside pitches)

It helped me a lot as hitter and I learned more from him in 2 years than anyone else all my life.

I don't remember seeing many on the golf tour, stride to hit the golf ball. Happy Gilmore was fun to watch!

He wasn't referring to the stride, but the movement of the body from the loaded position moving towards the baseball to hit. Simply stating not to just sit on the back side and turn hips and use your hands but to get the entire body into the swing. I believe there is only one guy that I know of in MLB that sits on his back side the entire time to hit and that is Tex.

It looks to me like he is making the case for the hips and the hands to move together. The hands needing to get in position to align with the hips and then they go together.

quote:

Originally posted by sam1234:
I'm tired of ex-mlb players not knowing how to teach the fundamentals. This is an ex 10 year mlb vet (major league vet, not minors) teaching the wrong hitting mechanics. At the end of the video, he states "the hands lead the hips, and it is wrong for the hips to lead the hands." Video below.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oRrTIoI_pU

This is wrong, and John Mallee (finalist for the Texas Ranger hitting coach - replace Jaramillo)states the correct process of the swing. Video evidence provided.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DA_PK6JPg9Y

Yep! No clue!

You want to know one that shocked me. Tony Gwynn! Anyone who has read "Men At Work" by George F. Will understands the time and energy Gwynn put in to analyzing his mechanics and overall hitting approach.

To see this video....shocking.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...ture=player_embedded

I'll go with the Bear...hips and hands together. Watch the back hip of a hitter and his hands move in unison.

Location of hands versus hips makes alot of problems really seeing what is happening in a swing. Hands will always be behind the hips the because they start from behind but the two move in unison.

You will find the same thing with pitching coaches. Just because they played in MLB does not mean they know how to teach. Buyer beware.

The absolute best hitting coach my son has ever had did not play a day beyond High School. He is however a perfectionist, detailed, uses video, knows how to communicate, and studies hitters like no one I have ever met. He has also read just about everything on hitting.