University of Chicago

You should reach out to Zoom2020 and Pitcherparent2020.  Both their sons got into U Chicago to play baseball this past December.   That is a tough one to pull off but clearly doable.  U Chicago will be at headfirst for sure.   Your academic measurables will be as important as your athletic measurables.  Best of luck.  

12whitesox12,

The most important recruiting measurables with Univ of Chicago is going to be your grades, academic rigor and SAT/ACT scores.  Very difficult school to get into with or without baseball. If you currently have desirable academic numbers for the Univ of Chicago and it is your top school, why wait?  Try to start a dialogue now with the coaches in advance of HeadFirst or other academic showcases.    Take the initiative.

Over the last 4 years, I've known a couple people that were seriously recruited by the Univ of Chicago. Both loved the campus and liked the Coaches a lot.    Both had extremely complimentary things to say about the school and the program after their sons visits.  I was led to believe the Coach has a little "academic latitude" with 1-2 players per year with Admissions, but not a lot.    This is why it is so important that you start a dialogue with the coaches to find out exactly what it is they are looking for, and if you have what they are looking for.  

Good luck!    

Here are some visuals:

2019 Player Distribution by State

2019 Player Distribution by Position

2019 Team Roster Insights

- Player Attrition

- Graduation Class   under vs upper

In-State vs out-of-State

Head Coach Tenure

Team performance last 5 years

2018 Athletic budget

Baseball budget last 2009 - 2018.

2019 baseball budget will be available in March

Hope this helps.

FYI - University of Chicago coaches are confirmed for all HeadFirst camps in the North East this summer: https://www.headfirsthonorroll...ball-showcase-camps/. Click on each session and you can see a list of schools and coaches who will attend.

Am I behind the 8 ball though? Seeking HA D3s, JUCO, and HA D1s. How many opportunities will I have the summer of my junior year if I attend these camps, am realistic about my level, and contact coaches at target schools?

The absolute first cut for these HAs are academics: GPA, ACT/SAT, rigor of curriculum. What are your stats in this arena?

The hot time for D3 recruiting is as a rising senior; Ivies begin as rising juniors, but continue through the next summer.

Are you sure you feel academically challenged at a JUCO? I know of no JUCOs which are on the same level as UC or HA D1s; you're at two different ends of the spectrum.

Any HF camp will be chock full of D3 and D1 HAs; don't limit yourself to specific HAs yet.

@Goosegg Would only go to JUCO to develop as a baseball player. Took ACT end of last year and got a 27. That score was without studying, and I am now in a class. Next ACT I expect to be in the 30s, hopefully 32+. GPA and class rigor are all good. 

Thanks for the quick update.

Others will chime in; I view a 32 as the minimum AND that needs to he coupled with D1 skills to be realistically considered by an Ivy. (There are lower scores admitted, but it's a sliding scale with the lower scores being reserved for potential All-Americans. If you haven't done so, do a quick search for, and fill in, the Ivy Academic Index to see your score. Also, research the concept of "Ivy Bands." Here you can develop an understanding of the sliding scale.)

UC and its peer schools (e.g., Amherst, William's, Haverford, etc.) probably don't have the latitude the Ivys do with a super stud, so I'd speculate you need to be in the top half of the admitted class academic stats to have a legit chance to pass the admissions barrier. (The Common Data Set of each school will provide this info.)

Above all, hitting (for position players) is the real benchmark to be recruited, so I'd really focus here. Do you regularly square up against hi-velo pitching? 

Heading to a JUCO to improve your baseball is high risk, limited reward for a HA. Some HAs dont take transfers; most of the rest have standards higher than simply getting admitted as a regular freshman. Many JUCOs have more than enough players competing for a limited number of slots (search some of the threads here to get a feel for JUCO baseball), so there is no assurance you will make a team, much less get coaching which elevates your game.

If you're in no particular rush to get to college, consider either a PG year or a gap year dedicated to improving your game to a recruitable level. (Personally, I think a gap year for any reason is great; I offered my daughter one, but she was in a rush to join the working world, for some unknown reason.)

@Goosegg I appreciate your response as well. Do you think the measurables listed in the OP would be enough coupled with a 32 ACT for Patriot League, Ivys, and other HA schools? Last year was a rough year for me hitting wise. I completely revamped my swing and have improved my EV off a tee from around 80 at the beginning of the summer to around 87-89 today. I assumed that my numbers would be good enough for UC and schools of the like just from comparing them with PG and PBR stats. Big focus for me will be ACT. I've been told 5 point increases are common, so I hope this class I am in can help me. Thanks for the help.

12whitesox12 posted:

@Goosegg Would only go to JUCO to develop as a baseball player. Took ACT end of last year and got a 27. That score was without studying, and I am now in a class. Next ACT I expect to be in the 30s, hopefully 32+. GPA and class rigor are all good. 

12whitesox12,

Based on the College Navigator, you'd probably want to shoot a little higher ~34 Composite, 35 English, 33-34 Math on the ACT scores to put you at 50th percentile.   This is assuming you have the baseball skills the Univ of Chicago is looking for.  If you have these two things covered then you have a fighting chance with Admissions.   This is an extremely selective University.

https://nces.ed.gov/collegenav...amp;id=144050#admsns

Best of luck going forward!

@fenwaysouth UC is test optional too. My grades are good, but I do have a few B+s. Is test optional really test optional? What other things would they look at and could it possibly help athletes?

Goosegg posted:

Thanks for the quick update.

Others will chime in; I view a 32 as the minimum AND that needs to he coupled with D1 skills to be realistically considered by an Ivy. (There are lower scores admitted, but it's a sliding scale with the lower scores being reserved for potential All-Americans. If you haven't done so, do a quick search for, and fill in, the Ivy Academic Index to see your score. Also, research the concept of "Ivy Bands." Here you can develop an understanding of the sliding scale.)

UC and its peer schools (e.g., Amherst, William's, Haverford, etc.) probably don't have the latitude the Ivys do with a super stud, so I'd speculate you need to be in the top half of the admitted class academic stats to have a legit chance to pass the admissions barrier. (The Common Data Set of each school will provide this info.)

Above all, hitting (for position players) is the real benchmark to be recruited, so I'd really focus here. Do you regularly square up against hi-velo pitching? 

Heading to a JUCO to improve your baseball is high risk, limited reward for a HA. Some HAs dont take transfers; most of the rest have standards higher than simply getting admitted as a regular freshman. Many JUCOs have more than enough players competing for a limited number of slots (search some of the threads here to get a feel for JUCO baseball), so there is no assurance you will make a team, much less get coaching which elevates your game.

If you're in no particular rush to get to college, consider either a PG year or a gap year dedicated to improving your game to a recruitable level. (Personally, I think a gap year for any reason is great; I offered my daughter one, but she was in a rush to join the working world, for some unknown reason.)

Below is any example of Parkland, 2019  ~31 players were on 4 yr rosters

12whitesox12 posted:

@fenwaysouth UC is test optional too. My grades are good, but I do have a few B+s. Is test optional really test optional? What other things would they look at and could it possibly help athletes?

Test optional is if you don't play baseball. Maybe someone else can correct me, but I believe you need to take the ACT/SAT if you plan to play D1  baseball.

12whitesox12, it sounds from your posts that you have high aspirations for school and baseball, and are wondering if your baseball abilities will be able to get into a super-selective school.  No-one can really say, because it will depend on lots of things, including (especially since you're a position player) how you play (hit) in front of coaches, at Headfirst or elsewhere.  The best advice is not to put all your eggs in one basket, or even only a few baskets.  There are a lot of great schools with baseball teams, you may not have heard of many of them.  Headfirst is great because it has a wide range of HA schools (in terms of, e.g., average ACT), and you will be seen by schools you haven't considered.  There are also some HA showcases in the spring and summer in Chicago (Scholarcase, Play to Win - I have no experience with these, but my son got their announcements), in addition to Headfirst/Showball on the coasts.

Do you have high school or travel coaches you can discuss this with?  Ask them what they think, and if they are willing to be references for you.

HA D3 recruiting gets very active in August before senior year, and you may not know where you stand before that.  Certainly you can email the UChicago coaches (and others) right now, tell them your measurables that can be backed up by your coaches whose contact info you provide, tell them what your schedule is for the summer, and ask where they are going to be recruiting.

nycdad posted:

12whitesox12 posted:

@fenwaysouth UC is test optional too. My grades are good, but I do have a few B+s. Is test optional really test optional? What other things would they look at and could it possibly help athletes?

Test optional is if you don't play baseball. Maybe someone else can correct me, but I believe you need to take the ACT/SAT if you plan to play D1  baseball.

UC is test optional. There are a few D1s that are also test optional. 

nycdad posted:

12whitesox12 posted:

@fenwaysouth UC is test optional too. My grades are good, but I do have a few B+s. Is test optional really test optional? What other things would they look at and could it possibly help athletes?

Test optional is if you don't play baseball. Maybe someone else can correct me, but I believe you need to take the ACT/SAT if you plan to play D1  baseball.

Test optional really means test optional and it's not an "extra" requirement to play D1 baseball.  There are a lot of colleges that do not require the SAT/ACT for admissions.   If the school doesn't require the SAT and you don't send an SAT it will NOT impact your chances to get into the school.   Below is a link to a listing of test optional schools.  For instance 12whitesox12 you mentioned the patriot league earlier you have Holy Cross and Bucknell who are optional.   You correctly point out U Chi is as well.  Good luck.

https://blog.prepscholar.com/t...tional-colleges-list

RoadRunner posted:

nycdad posted:

12whitesox12 posted:

@fenwaysouth UC is test optional too. My grades are good, but I do have a few B+s. Is test optional really test optional? What other things would they look at and could it possibly help athletes?

Test optional is if you don't play baseball. Maybe someone else can correct me, but I believe you need to take the ACT/SAT if you plan to play D1  baseball.

UC is test optional. There are a few D1s that are also test optional. 

I recall my son had to report his SAT score when he applied for the NCAA clearinghouse for D1 athletic eligibility.  I recall this was not an optional box.  Am I mistaken about this?

Smitty28 posted:

RoadRunner posted:

nycdad posted:

12whitesox12 posted:

@fenwaysouth UC is test optional too. My grades are good, but I do have a few B+s. Is test optional really test optional? What other things would they look at and could it possibly help athletes?

Test optional is if you don't play baseball. Maybe someone else can correct me, but I believe you need to take the ACT/SAT if you plan to play D1  baseball.

UC is test optional. There are a few D1s that are also test optional. 

I recall my son had to report his SAT score when he applied for the NCAA clearinghouse for D1 athletic eligibility.  I recall this was not an optional box.  Am I mistaken about this?

I just looked and it does seem to be some kind of eligibility factor for the clearinghouse.  This is not my area of expertise in the least so I look forward to the answer.   The school's admissions though wouldn't use these scores, I mean how could they if test-optional but NYCDad may be right that you have to take the test.   The OP  has likely already met the min standard for the clearinghouse with a 27 ACT.  Again though not my area of expertise.

I'm pretty sure that NCAA requires DI and DII athletes to submit SAT or ACT scores for eligibility: http://www.ncaa.org/student-at...s/future/test-scores

DIII athletes don't register with NCAA so I'm assuming only the school's criteria would apply?

It seems that NAIA athletes have to meet two out of three academic criteria (test score being one of them): https://www.ncsasports.org/nai...-center/requirements

A 32 ACT with solid baseball skills will be attractive by HC Fitzgerald.  Once you hit the academic benchmark, please remember these guys are true baseball guys looking for the best players they can get.  As pointed out, as a position player you've got to be a hitter! Other metrics: get the IF velo up to mid  80's you'll be fine, as long as: You have quick fielding actions, quick to the ball and athletic. Get your 60 speed down to 6.9 should be the goal, a 7.3 is not attractive.  Working on your start and finish will help immensely. It takes WORK and a PLAN to get there.

Plan to go to the June west coast HF event, then go again in July so the coaches have multiple times to see you. 

If you live in the Chicago area, inquire with your HS Varsity coach about the Chicagoland Classic. It's an event for the top 2-4 players of each team, as well as the top couple of players who have strong academics. (the event has a single day event just for top academic players)

Did you start on HS Varsity last year?  Are you a starter on your club team?  Does your club team play against strong competition?

Whitesox, listen to Gov.  Also, pretty sure Fitzgerald has fewer slots with admissions than some other HA academic schools.  Also, if he doesn't follow up with you after he's seen you play, and you've let him know UC is your top choice, then move on.  There are other great options out there.  

One other thought.  Try the SAT in addition to retaking the ACT.  My son scored 27 on ACT his first go around, too, then after having a tutor for six months, scored a  28. Yippee.  But then he took the old SAT a month later and got a 1440 which at the time = a 33/34 on the ACT. Go figure.

Appreciate the responses. Will be sure to take the advice. 

Several D3 schools got in trouble several years ago, when using the test optional admissions for athletes. When considering Financial Aid for those who went the test optional route, Athletics were taken into consideration That is a big no-no in D3. 

Similar to the old Leadership scholly's, form long ago. FA departmanets were granting them based on being a captian for the prospective students sport. 

Now D3 has a better handle on that, and Thletics cannot be considered for FA, even in these cases. 

Won't  name, names because it was an innocent mistake. 

The test optional strategy is intended to boost the pool of underrepresented applicants. First gen, kids graduating from poor schools, socio-economically challeged (think Appalachia or inner city), etc. The purpose of broadening out the application pool was not to enhance or give any advantage to athletic recruits.

"The University of Chicago, which made the SAT and ACT optional last year, reports a record enrollment this fall of first-generation, low-income and rural students and veterans."  https://www.google.com/amp/s/w...uestions-of-fairness

Most, but not all, college baseball aspiring kids, will not fit into those categories (except -  maybe - first gen). 

Goosegg posted:

The test optional strategy is intended to boost the pool of underrepresented applicants. First gen, kids graduating from poor schools, socio-economically challeged (think Appalachia or inner city), etc. The purpose of broadening out the application pool was not to enhance or give any advantage to athletic recruits.

"The University of Chicago, which made the SAT and ACT optional last year, reports a record enrollment this fall of first-generation, low-income and rural students and veterans."  https://www.google.com/amp/s/w...uestions-of-fairness

Most, but not all, college baseball aspiring kids, will not fit into those categories (except -  maybe - first gen). 

 

Yes, and the schools did not intend to grant an athletic advantage. Athletics were not the goal. They just thought it was a good idea. They did it without running it past the NCAA compliance department at the schools. It did not even cross their minds. They just considered ti an extraciricular, like playing an intrument or taking part in Debate club. 

The pentalty was not harsh. They had to void any post season play that the ineligble students participated in. 

Good luck. Non-baseball anecdote, my daughter had perfect grades, 5s in 4 AP exams, and 1 4 in the 5th ones, and superb SATs. She really was interested in U. Chicago. Until she realized her academics were still in the bottom third of applicants. 

Goosegg posted:

The test optional strategy is intended to boost the pool of underrepresented applicants. First gen, kids graduating from poor schools, socio-economically challeged (think Appalachia or inner city), etc. The purpose of broadening out the application pool was not to enhance or give any advantage to athletic recruits.

"The University of Chicago, which made the SAT and ACT optional last year, reports a record enrollment this fall of first-generation, low-income and rural students and veterans."  https://www.google.com/amp/s/w...uestions-of-fairness

Most, but not all, college baseball aspiring kids, will not fit into those categories (except -  maybe - first gen). 

 

Goose -  I  follow your logic but read on....   I agree that test-optional was put in place to boost the pool of underrepresented applicants and therefore not intended to enhance or give advantages to athletic recruits.   When you say most baseball kids won't fit into these categories, while a broad generalization, it's likely very true.   

However unless I am way off base, test optional is for all students applying not just first gen, kids from tough socio-economic backgrounds, its also for baseball kids, kids from well off families etc.  You may not be making this point but I thought I would seek clarity.   My daughter applied and got into her school which was a test-optional school without shooting in her ACT (which was quite good but on the average). 

The point of clarity is for the OP.  He's Junior in HS trying to process this information.  His application will be treated just like every other student who applies test optional no matter what his economic, first language or athlete vs non athlete status might be.

Interesting Study

https://www.insidehighered.com...esearch-still-needed

Relevant part: 

What are the characteristics of students who choose not to submit test scores? Twenty-five percent of the students in the study were nonsubmitters. Women choose not to submit scores at higher rates than men. Black or African American students are twice as likely to be nonsubmitters, and underrepresented and low-income applicants are more likely not to submit scores than the general population.

Nonsubmitters are more likely to major in the humanities, social sciences or liberal arts. The study found a surprising number of students with access to good college counseling choosing not to submit, and concluded that these students appear to be “accurately playing the corners” in applying to college. As a counselor at an independent school, I find that interesting, because I have always suspected that admissions officers may assume that nonsubmitters from good public and private schools may have lower scores than is actually the case. I also wonder how many of those students may be appealing applicants because they have low financial need. The other interesting nugget was that a number of coaches at Division III colleges encourage recruits not to submit if they have modest test scores (Division I recruits are required to report test scores).

[my daughter played the corners accurately, low financial aid - that's another can of worms, lastly the D3 coach angle] 

Another reason why I like UChicago is because if I get in, tuition is paid for. Pretty sure anyone with a household income of less than $100,000 gets their tuition paid for, if I'm not mistaken.

12whitesox12 posted:

Another reason why I like UChicago is because if I get in, tuition is paid for. Pretty sure anyone with a household income of less than $100,000 gets their tuition paid for, if I'm not mistaken.

They guarantee free tuition for families that make up to $125K: https://collegeadmissions.uchicago.edu/cost-aid.

You would probably want to use their net cost calculator to get a better idea though. In addition to tuition, there is also fees and room & board which cost around $17K per year.

Chicago is among the most generous, but many other schools also have very generous need-based aid, and/or also academic scholarships.  I found a list here: https://studentloanhero.com/fe...ancial-aid-packages/.  There are other lists/calculators out there.

Don't narrow yourself too early; if you need to stay in Illinois, look up all the schools around you to see what they say about financial aid.  Keep your grades up and you will have many options.

"The point of clarity is for the OP.  He's Junior in HS trying to process this information.  His application will be treated just like every other student who applies test optional no matter what his economic, first language or athlete vs non athlete status might be."

Yes, absolutely unless coach supported, his application will be treated as every other applicant (i.e.  into the black box of an admissions committee).

I have no knowledge of that process; but I do note that UC admissions standards haven't dropped AND the pool has grown much larger. This implies that an already very low acceptance rate has dropped even further.

If a kid isn't coach supported, his baseball is viewed as an EC and will be measured against other ECs. Schools like UC want more than "just an EC;" these schools want to see ECs wherein the applicant was in leadership, passionate about the EC (e.g., nationally recognized [model UN, Seimens or ISEF, published author, etc.]), and stands above other (tens of thousands) of applicants. These schools want to see perseverance and a kid who "beats the odds;" that could mean a homeless kid heading toward valedictorian, a rural kid inventing a method to heat chicken coops, really anything which separates applicants. (And, if the coach isn't supporting you, you haven't separated in baseball, leaving other ECs to carry the load.) These schools want quality, not quantity type ECs.

As for cutting the FA corner, UC is need blind. 

OP re: financial aid. Most peer schools to UC have very similar FA - meaning middle class (and lower) families receive steeply discounted to free tuition maybe even extending that aid to room and board.

 PS. (From Gunner article: "Students who chose not to submit were admitted at lower rates than submitters. . ." So there is no advantage to a high scorer leaving that box blank.)

My son is there. DM me if you want info. And good luck and Go Sox!

Just replied directly to the OP by DM but thought I should put this information out there to help others that are interested in Chicago.  My son (RHP, 6'1" topping at 87) was accepted ED this fall.  The HC told us he gets a green or red light from admissions in the beginning of the process based on test scores and GPA.  Red is a hard stop but green is no guarantee - just gives the HC the OK to continue the recruiting process.  My son superscored at 32 and 1470 and had an inconsistent GPA (near 4.0 at public school for 2 years but dropped after he transferred to a top private school).  We never got a definite yes from the HC but he said he would advocate for son with admissions and recommended that he get his application in early so he would have time to do that.  I heard that another player that was admitted received a likely letter but the coach never mentioned that as an option to us (though we also never asked for it).  I believe the player that received the likely letter had a 35 and close to a 4.0. The HC said that the essays would be really important so son spent a lot of time on those.  It was risky and stressful applying ED without a definite yes, but UC was son's top choice and he had other schools/coaches that told him he would be admitted ED2 or RD to their schools if he didn't get in to UC, so we felt like he had a fallback position.  Son is also a legacy (grandparent and older) so that may have helped some.  

UC baseball admissions is flakey. Not sure if it's the admissions or coach who is the source for the lack of clarity. Strongly suggest that you have a backup plan if ED'ing with them.

Still a little confused with test optional. I know for D1/D2 it is necessary but I haven't found any concrete information on D3. It would seem unlikely that UChicago would allow test optional for baseball players but with the virus already cancelling the April ACT and possibly even the June ACT, does anyone have any information or guesses on how admissions would work for athletes?

Tests are necessary for D1 and D2 because those players have to go through the NCAA clearinghouse and be approved to be eligible to play.  SAT/ACT is part of that process.  It has nothing to do with any particular school.  Also, there are all kinds of technical details about what money can be given at D1 and D2 schools, that partly depends on the test scores.

D3 doesn't have any of that.  Eligibility is up to the school, so is financial aid (with some NCAA rules that BishopLeftiesDad mentioned).  So in theory, if the school is test optional, then no-one is required to submit tests for admission.

However, High Academic D3 admissions usually do a pre-read (where they tell the coach you are admissible) based on test scores and transcript, in the summer/early fall.  Coaches recruit players who pass the pre-read.  If you don't submit test scores, a school's admissions office might not be willing/able to completely do that pre-read.  In that case, the coach might decide to recruit other players that he can get a clear answer about.  I wonder if anyone here has experience with that?  My son did have test scores, so it wasn't an issue.

I do also know that this year, many schools are dropping their testing requirements, because so many are being cancelled.  So, it could be that HA athletic admissions will change the way they operate, too.

Great question.  I feel for the students that were trying to get those tests in only to have them canceled.  With a 2022, I'm wondering if the testing companies are going to come up with an online solution in case we deal with this again in the fall/winter of 2020.

I read several posts about admission to the University of Chicago on the social page of a guy who entered there last year. It turned out that having good athletic performance is not a guarantee of admission. In addition, you need to have a high academic score in most subjects.  Based on this information, I decided that I would apply to asa college hialeah. Many of my friends went there and said they were satisfied. Do you think it's not too late to change your mind a year before admission? My parents say it's a rash decision.

From my understanding, UChicago is one of the toughest schools to get into. Right there with Caltech and MIT. Coach gets very little help from admissions.

UChicago is actively looking to build up their athletic programs, realizing that alumni like to contribute to winning sports teams. Their two best sports are soccer and tennis.

But the rising import of athletics has not been fully communicated nor absorbed by most staff and faculty. So balancing schoolwork with athletics is left up to the student, making UChicago one of the toughest places to be a student-athlete.

No help through admissions

No in-season early registration

No tutoring or help picking a major

Athletes have to fund-raise to pay for equipment and travel

Days off for athletic travel count as absences

All work must be made up, and is subject to the individual professors' requirements

Also, UChicago baseball does not fully participate in the UAA athletic conference, opting instead for a regional schedule to cut down on travel costs. But, what a great school! Right up there with Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, MIT.

@SpeedDemon posted:

UChicago is actively looking to build up their athletic programs, realizing that alumni like to contribute to winning sports teams. Their two best sports are soccer and tennis.

But the rising import of athletics has not been fully communicated nor absorbed by most staff and faculty. So balancing schoolwork with athletics is left up to the student, making UChicago one of the toughest places to be a student-athlete.

No help through admissions

No in-season early registration

No tutoring or help picking a major

Athletes have to fund-raise to pay for equipment and travel

Days off for athletic travel count as absences

All work must be made up, and is subject to the individual professors' requirements

Also, UChicago baseball does not fully participate in the UAA athletic conference, opting instead for a regional schedule to cut down on travel costs. But, what a great school! Right up there with Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, MIT.

What type of fundraising is required? Do other schools require this as well?

Reach out to MidwestMom...her son plays for UofC...she hasn't posted in a while, I'll send her a note.

Pay It Forward Recruiting Advice from a 2019 Mom | High School Baseball Web (hsbaseballweb.com)

@TerribleBPthrower posted:

What type of fundraising is required? Do other schools require this as well?

My 2021 daughter was recruited by Chicago for softball. Fundraising was def part of the package as travel funds were limited. Pretty sure it was $500/player/season, could have been a bit lower. Was the same for baseball we were told. We found it not uncommon outside of the well-funded D3 conferences (NESCAC, NEWMAC, UAA etc) to have to chip in for uniforms and travel. Players will sometimes do car washes or other events to raise funds, but often parents just write another check.

Great school. Definitely the toughest school to get accepted into in that conference. Their team is always very competitive and scrappy. It can be a pretty rough neighborhood to go to college in, fwiw

@3and2Fastball posted:

Great school. Definitely the toughest school to get accepted into in that conference. Their team is always very competitive and scrappy. It can be a pretty rough neighborhood to go to college in, fwiw

Hyde Park - Drug dealers, pimps, and economic Nobel Prize winners.

@SpeedDemon posted:

UChicago is actively looking to build up their athletic programs, realizing that alumni like to contribute to winning sports teams. Their two best sports are soccer and tennis.

But the rising import of athletics has not been fully communicated nor absorbed by most staff and faculty. So balancing schoolwork with athletics is left up to the student, making UChicago one of the toughest places to be a student-athlete.

No help through admissions

No in-season early registration

No tutoring or help picking a major

Athletes have to fund-raise to pay for equipment and travel

Days off for athletic travel count as absences

All work must be made up, and is subject to the individual professors' requirements

Also, UChicago baseball does not fully participate in the UAA athletic conference, opting instead for a regional schedule to cut down on travel costs. But, what a great school! Right up there with Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, MIT.

Sounds like they hate student athletes. Not an environment I’d want for my athlete.

@RoadRunner posted:

Sounds like they hate student athletes. Not an environment I’d want for my athlete.

I think it's more that the university's focus is on academics, with not much thought given to sports.

@RoadRunner posted:

Sounds like they hate student athletes. Not an environment I’d want for my athlete.

I think that you are missing the entire point of a University of Chicago education.  Absolutely no one, I mean no one, is going to Hyde Park for the sports.  Every single athlete is there for the education first.  By a wide margin.  

@Around_The_Horn posted:

I think that you are missing the entire point of a University of Chicago education.  Absolutely no one, I mean no one, is going to Hyde Park for the sports.  Every single athlete is there for the education first.  By a wide margin.  

With all due respect, I think you are missing my point!  I am quite familiar with University of Chicago. And I stand by what I said. Let me phrase it a different way. UC is no place for an athlete.

Hi everyone -- haven't been around for awhile. This looks like a long thread, but if I'm seeing the question at hand it appears to be parent fundraising requirements at UofC, I would respond that there are no requirements in baseball. There is an annual university campaign for donating to the sports programs for alumni and parents, and I think perhaps we get one other email, but it doesn't seem any different (and is lower key) than my own alma mater, Northwestern.

Any other questions, let me know.

Just in general to parents who are going through this with high academic kids. My son is a rising senior and has gotten an amazing education that I would put up against any other school, period. We went through the ups and downs of the recruiting process and with a little hindsight, and my son had to choose between a D1 school that he wasn't sure he loved and and a few high academic D3s. He went with UofC and didn't look back. My husband played D1 Basketball and chose Northwestern because of the academics even though he could have played at schools where the teams actually won. He didn't look back. My best advice to parents whose kids likely won't be in the MLB is to pick the best academic school you can where you can play. That education serves you your entire life.

Ok, so I read through a bit more and want to set the record straight on a few other points that were raised for those parents and students who have an interest in UofC. 

Athletes have to fund-raise to pay for equipment and travel: False -- not true for baseball. Can't speak to other sports.

Days off for athletic travel count as absences: False. My son never had his athletic schedule questioned -- he let his professors know and they were accommodating. UofC fields hundreds of athletes on a lot of teams, so it's not like baseball players are unique. However it is true he did have to take any quizzes or tests he wasn't there for and he did have to turn in homework.

One thing to note for baseball -- they don't miss school every week during the season. Most of their games are on weekends, and often double headers. They miss a few Fridays and played local teams occasionally early evening during the week, but they did not miss school every week. If you're up front with your professors, there shouldn't be a problem. I thought most HA schools require making up tests and work, but perhaps other parents can weigh in there as a comparison. 

To be transparent, I would say in general:

1. Athletes don't get preferential treatment. They're like other students. They're not Gods. They're not hated. They're simply part of the student community. And quite a number of students actually come out to baseball games when it's not 32 degrees -- which is more than came out when I was in college.

2. Athletes have to keep up academically. 35 of the 37 baseball players were Academic All-Conference this Spring -- that's 3.3+ grade point. 

3. UofC facilities are not state of the art and it's fair to say they don't have the resources that D1 schools have. I doubt that would be a surprise to most parents who are doing their homework.

4. UofC is highly competitive among HA baseball players who want to play ball at a top school, especially those who have that feeling they will go D3. It's true the admissions process for athletes is not completely clear (ie is there some preference or not?). However my son was admitted ED and I think each athlete is different based on the student's record, their essays (which mattered) and how much the Coach wants them.

5. My son loves it there, he's found great friends on the team and in his fraternity and respects and likes his coaches. The parents are great too!

Separately, I'd like to challenge the comment that UofC is no place for an athlete. Probably for the person who commented on it they believe it, and that's fine. If your focus is on your son being an athlete and having the D1 baseball experience, then UofC is NOT for you. Fully agree with that.

BUT, that's no reason to insult the student athletes (UofC fields hundreds of athletes every year) and their Coaches (who are terrific). Especially because we see our sons and daughters work their butts off just like other student athletes do year round, while they have to compete academically with some of the smartest peers they could have at one of the world's best universities... and they do so without any favors from anybody. They ARE athletes. And they ARE students too.

I know I appreciated what this website was for me when my son was going through the process -- I learned so much from so many of those veterans during my son's journey, which was filled with  many great memories, a few tears and a lot of laughter. Everyone said it works out for the best and it really does.  Good luck!

Thank you Midwest Mom!

@Midwest Mom posted:

Hi everyone -- haven't been around for awhile. This looks like a long thread, but if I'm seeing the question at hand it appears to be parent fundraising requirements at UofC, I would respond that there are no requirements in baseball. There is an annual university campaign for donating to the sports programs for alumni and parents, and I think perhaps we get one other email, but it doesn't seem any different (and is lower key) than my own alma mater, Northwestern.

Any other questions, let me know.

Just in general to parents who are going through this with high academic kids. My son is a rising senior and has gotten an amazing education that I would put up against any other school, period. We went through the ups and downs of the recruiting process and with a little hindsight, and my son had to choose between a D1 school that he wasn't sure he loved and and a few high academic D3s. He went with UofC and didn't look back. My husband played D1 Basketball and chose Northwestern because of the academics even though he could have played at schools where the teams actually won. He didn't look back. My best advice to parents whose kids likely won't be in the MLB is to pick the best academic school you can where you can play. That education serves you your entire life.

Thanks. Appreciate the input  

I hadn’t connected these things before but now that you mention it, I did get several emails last fall asking for sport-specific donations during “Donation Week” at several schools.
So perhaps the momentum has shifted to means testing the fundraising rather than requiring it. If so, it’s a great development - shows the schools are willing to supplement the athletic budget rather than requiring the program to raise $X to function.

Also, again, not being antagonistic, just trying to square differing data points: what’s your sons major? I ask because we know a current soccer player and a soccer coach who’ve told us that some Chicago professors aren’t accommodating; that some profs are even hostile towards taking time off for sports, making it extra difficult to balance athletics with academics.

I’m wondering if that varies by major, or by sport (looks like soccer plays a full UAA schedule vs baseball which plays regionally).

Thanks.

@Midwest Mom posted:

Ok, so I read through a bit more and want to set the record straight on a few other points that were raised for those parents and students who have an interest in UofC.

Athletes have to fund-raise to pay for equipment and travel: False -- not true for baseball. Can't speak to other sports.

Days off for athletic travel count as absences: False. My son never had his athletic schedule questioned -- he let his professors know and they were accommodating. UofC fields hundreds of athletes on a lot of teams, so it's not like baseball players are unique. However it is true he did have to take any quizzes or tests he wasn't there for and he did have to turn in homework.

One thing to note for baseball -- they don't miss school every week during the season. Most of their games are on weekends, and often double headers. They miss a few Fridays and played local teams occasionally early evening during the week, but they did not miss school every week. If you're up front with your professors, there shouldn't be a problem. I thought most HA schools require making up tests and work, but perhaps other parents can weigh in there as a comparison.

To be transparent, I would say in general:

1. Athletes don't get preferential treatment. They're like other students. They're not Gods. They're not hated. They're simply part of the student community. And quite a number of students actually come out to baseball games when it's not 32 degrees -- which is more than came out when I was in college.

2. Athletes have to keep up academically. 35 of the 37 baseball players were Academic All-Conference this Spring -- that's 3.3+ grade point.

3. UofC facilities are not state of the art and it's fair to say they don't have the resources that D1 schools have. I doubt that would be a surprise to most parents who are doing their homework.

4. UofC is highly competitive among HA baseball players who want to play ball at a top school, especially those who have that feeling they will go D3. It's true the admissions process for athletes is not completely clear (ie is there some preference or not?). However my son was admitted ED and I think each athlete is different based on the student's record, their essays (which mattered) and how much the Coach wants them.

5. My son loves it there, he's found great friends on the team and in his fraternity and respects and likes his coaches. The parents are great too!

Separately, I'd like to challenge the comment that UofC is no place for an athlete. Probably for the person who commented on it they believe it, and that's fine. If your focus is on your son being an athlete and having the D1 baseball experience, then UofC is NOT for you. Fully agree with that.

BUT, that's no reason to insult the student athletes (UofC fields hundreds of athletes every year) and their Coaches (who are terrific). Especially because we see our sons and daughters work their butts off just like other student athletes do year round, while they have to compete academically with some of the smartest peers they could have at one of the world's best universities... and they do so without any favors from anybody. They ARE athletes. And they ARE students too.

I know I appreciated what this website was for me when my son was going through the process -- I learned so much from so many of those veterans during my son's journey, which was filled with  many great memories, a few tears and a lot of laughter. Everyone said it works out for the best and it really does.  Good luck!

Thank you for providing clarification. My comment was based on a prior post by another member about how the the baseball program is run. Since I felt the requirements/treatments posted were unreasonable, of course, IMO any NCAA varsity team, where members have to pay for their own equipment, travel and have absences count against them academically (discrimination IMO) is no place for an athlete. The data points that you listed 1-5 are very similar to son’s D1. And IMO student athletes are treated fairly, for the most part, at his school. It’s unfortunate that you felt I was insulting student athletes when in reality, I was irritated by how I perceived they were being treated at University of Chicago.

@Midwest Mom posted:

I thought most HA schools require making up tests and work, but perhaps other parents can weigh in there as a comparison.

Are there any universities, of any sort, that don't require students who miss class (for whatever reason) to make up the work?

@anotherparent posted:

Are there any universities, of any sort, that don't require students who miss class (for whatever reason) to make up the work?

From the D1s that I know, all are required to make up the work, do the project, test etc. It would most likely be some type of NCAA violation to have them going through class without doing the work.

@anotherparent posted:

Are there any universities, of any sort, that don't require students who miss class (for whatever reason) to make up the work?

Sure, I can't imagine a case where students don't have to make up the work, but there are differences in who defines this and how it's done.

Some colleges have blanket policies on how much leeway can be given to athletes on make up exams, assignments, projects. For example - one department might say students have the entire semester to turn in any uncompleted work, while another might impose, say, a 4-week post-due deadline.

But most universities allow individual professors to set post-due deadlines. So the make-up window essentially becomes a negotiation between student and prof. Sometimes professors elect not to provide accommodation for athletics or travel for whatever reason, effectively requiring students to turn in assignments or take tests early.

Some teams have an academic liaison who travels with them. This person(s), often a trainer, asst coach, or other staff, is authorized by the school (NCAA has some rules here I think) to monitor the students during remote instruction, to tutor them, and to proctor their exams. This is the most accommodating.

Things get sticky when an athlete has a high workload and a major that requires specialized knowledge (more likely at a CalTech or Chicago). In this case, the on-the-road liaison (if there is one) is highly unlikely to have the knowledge or skills to help out, while the athlete is in a traveling, practicing, playing environment that is ill-suited to serious study. Professorial accommodation in these cases is key. And it is my understanding, given the rigor at UChicago, that some profs are less than accommodating. My guess is that this is driven mostly by a lack of understanding, rather than malice.*

(*Not gonna lie though, I've heard reports specifically at Chicago that some profs are outright hostile towards sports.)

@SpeedDemon posted:

Sure, I can't imagine a case where students don't have to make up the work, but there are differences in who defines this and how it's done.

Some colleges have blanket policies on how much leeway can be given to athletes on make up exams, assignments, projects. For example - one department might say students have the entire semester to turn in any uncompleted work, while another might impose, say, a 4-week post-due deadline.

But most universities allow individual professors to set post-due deadlines. So the make-up window essentially becomes a negotiation between student and prof. Sometimes professors elect not to provide accommodation for athletics or travel for whatever reason, effectively requiring students to turn in assignments or take tests early.

Some teams have an academic liaison who travels with them. This person(s), often a trainer, asst coach, or other staff, is authorized by the school (NCAA has some rules here I think) to monitor the students during remote instruction, to tutor them, and to proctor their exams. This is the most accommodating.

Things get sticky when an athlete has a high workload and a major that requires specialized knowledge (more likely at a CalTech or Chicago). In this case, the on-the-road liaison (if there is one) is highly unlikely to have the knowledge or skills to help out, while the athlete is in a traveling, practicing, playing environment that is ill-suited to serious study. Professorial accommodation in these cases is key. And it is my understanding, given the rigor at UChicago, that some profs are less than accommodating. My guess is that this is driven mostly by a lack of understanding, rather than malice.*

(*Not gonna lie though, I've heard reports specifically at Chicago that some profs are outright hostile towards sports.)

I have seen “less than accommodating”  at kids D1.  The difference maker in any case would be how the athletic department and school intervenes on an athletes behalf. From what I have seen, usually the athletic academic advisor is a good place for the student to seek help/direction, when not being treated as required. Again, my perspective is only D1.

@Around_The_Horn posted:

Hyde Park - Drug dealers, pimps, and economic Nobel Prize winners.

And people with masters degrees driving cabs.  Hyde Park is somewhat OK, most of the time, although my cousin who grew up there got mugged 3 times in a 5 year span.  A few blocks outside of Hyde Park is rough & tumble though!

Anybody care to give an opinion on which city is worse, Baltimore or Chicago? My wife and I joke that we toured America’s deadliest cities this summer and didn’t get shot, although we did hear gun shots once. In a 3 week stretch for showcases and camps we visited Chicago, Philly, and Baltimore.

@TerribleBPthrower posted:

Anybody care to give an opinion on which city is worse, Baltimore or Chicago? My wife and I joke that we toured America’s deadliest cities this summer and didn’t get shot, although we did hear gun shots once. In a 3 week stretch for showcases and camps we visited Chicago, Philly, and Baltimore.

Weather = B'more

Music = Chi-town (love their blues)

Dining = push

Baseball teams = push, love both Camden and Wrigley. Comiskey/US Cellular/Guaranteed Rate, meh not so much.

Crime = push, depends on what part of town you're in. Even today's clueless tourists know what part of town to avoid.

Overall score is a tie

Chicago has a few micro area that are horrific, once you get 20-30m away from those areas it has beautiful suburbs and great schools.  Southwest  Hinsdale areas are great, Few out straight west, Northwest Barrington area phenomenal, Northshore; there's a 20 mile stretch from Evanston to Lake Bluff where it's really pretty and off the lake (very prosperous areas).  It's tough to visit the Michigan Ave area; have to be sensitive of times and activities going on....use to be very safe, gotta be vigilant.

Baltimore while I've visited, not a big fan, but it likely has similiar safe good school areas which I think are well north of JHopkins.

Time to venture to other city's ....unless you want to see Wrigley Field.  They've really built up that area, great job, great bars, dining...safe

@TerribleBPthrower posted:

Anybody care to give an opinion on which city is worse, Baltimore or Chicago? My wife and I joke that we toured America’s deadliest cities this summer and didn’t get shot, although we did hear gun shots once. In a 3 week stretch for showcases and camps we visited Chicago, Philly, and Baltimore.

Balmer, by a long shot!  I grew up there part of the time.  (We pronounced it “Balmer”)