Skip to main content

I am trying to find out what separates players who get drafted from players who do not. I know there are tools like pitch speed, running speed and power that can't be taught that stand out when you watch games. Are these the types of things that catch the eyes of scouts.
I know there is no science to this but I am curious as to what gets a kid drafted, even in the 20th - 30th rounds.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Once you get past the obvious selections, mental approach, baseball savvy and personal conduct (how they carry themselves in pregame and the game) can make the difference. A player should assume he's being watched from the time he gets off the bus and/or comes out of the locker room. A coach may place a positive comment with a scout as to what kind of person the player is in the locker room and the dugout.
quote:
Originally posted by RJM:
Once you get past the obvious selections, mental approach, baseball savvy and personal conduct (how they carry themselves in pregame and the game) can make the difference. A player should assume he's being watched from the time he gets off the bus and/or comes out of the locker room. A coach may place a positive comment with a scout as to what kind of person the player is in the locker room and the dugout.


Hate be cynical, but the importance of off-field personal conduct in the draft actually is in direct proportion to talent level. I won't name names but you don't need to google very much to verify how little conduct or appearance actually matters in the draft. Bad behavior rarely seems to even cost players any money, other than attorney fees.

The upper rounds of fhe draft are liberally sprinkled with felons.
Last edited by Dad04
quote:
Originally posted by fillsfan:
I am trying to find out what separates players who get drafted from players who do not.


This is just my opinion, besides having ability and tools, some players are drafted with the team hopes of being future ML players, some players are drafted to fill in the holes for milb and then given an opportunity to prove themselves to do more.
A player I know was drafted in the 45th round a few years back, now I see he was just moved to the 40 man roster. That may not mean he will get to MLB but it does mean the team he is on has future plans for him.

Some players don't get drafted because they can't fully commit, some want more money than they are worth at the time. I don't think it's really anything that is easy to understand, why some get drafted and why some do not.

I do agree with Dad04, talent will prevail over any player that has off the field issues. Tean know that a lot has to do with just being a kid and growing up.
quote:
Originally posted by Dad04:
quote:
Originally posted by RJM:
Once you get past the obvious selections, mental approach, baseball savvy and personal conduct (how they carry themselves in pregame and the game) can make the difference. A player should assume he's being watched from the time he gets off the bus and/or comes out of the locker room. A coach may place a positive comment with a scout as to what kind of person the player is in the locker room and the dugout.

Hate be cynical, but the importance of off-field personal conduct in the draft actually is in direct proportion to talent level. I won't name names but you don't need to google very much to verify how little conduct or appearance actually matters in the draft. Bad behavior rarely seems to even cost players any money, other than attorney fees.

The upper rounds of fhe draft are liberally sprinkled with felons.
Exactly why I started my response with "Once you get past the obvious selections ...." In rounds 30-50 there's enough gray area on talent/potential to bother with character issues.
Last edited by RJM
Makeup is very important, but to MLB clubs it’s only important when a player has enough talent.

Each year there are thousands of super kids with remarkable work ethic and great character who do not get drafted. A few do get drafted as “organizational” players.

There have been some bad makeup types who have slipped a lot lower than their talent dictated they go in the draft.

The biggest problem is that most people do not understand exactly what championship caliber or plus makeup is. The type of makeup they are looking for is the type that will allow the player to reach and succeed at the major league level. They are not looking for a bunch of nice choir boys.

Another strange thing regarding makeup… One club might think a certain player has makeup problems while another club might think the same player has great makeup. Everyone does not have the same definition as to what great makeup is.

We need to remember who some of the greatest players ever and some of the greatest teams in history were. Lots of players that most people would have a hard time describing that type of makeup in a positive way.

This all led to one of baseball’s most famous sayings, I think by Leo Durocher… “Nice guys finish last” Just for the record, I’ve never believed in that statement even a little bit. Our prisons are full of not so nice guys and that is even worse than being in last place. And of course, we all know, there have been many champions who are also nice guys. Just real talented nice guys!

BTW, usually the "obvious" selections end after about 5 or 10 picks. Every year there are players drafted in the first round that were not so obvious.
When a player is drafted in the later rounds, its still with the hopes that the player ends up helping the Big League club. This has actually happened many times. So they're still looking for talent above all else.
Thanks for all the opinions and info. What I can assume from what has been written so far is that talent is obviously the most important followed by game savvy, attitudeand work ethic.
If a 17 yo can throw 90-95 mph, hit the ball almost 400 ft or run at whatever the magic number is, does this get the attention of the scouts and then they look at the other factors?
Thanks for the feedback. I love this website!!
There are kids who have tools and get drafted. Then, there are kids with tools who don't get drafted. Those who get drafted are those who show the tools at game speed.

Baseball, compared to other sports like football or basketball, requires greater management of adrenaline. A player needs to be quick and explosive, but in a more controlled, managed way.

Great speech in Any Given Sunday by Pacino -Game of Inches. He says "Life's this game of inches...the margin of error is so small...one half a step too late or too early, and you don't quite make it...one half second too slow or too fast and you don't quite catch it...the inches we need are everywhere around us...they're in every break of the game, in every minute and every second...those inches are the difference between winning and losing".

So, those players that have the mental makeup to arrive at speed and on time while maintaining form are those who will perform at the highest level.

So, for me, the player who has the ability to remain calm, confident and be explosive has the mental makeup necessary.
Last edited by cheeseattheknees
quote:
Thanks for all the opinions and info. What I can assume from what has been written so far is that talent is obviously the most important followed by game savvy, attitudeand work ethic.
If a 17 yo can throw 90-95 mph, hit the ball almost 400 ft or run at whatever the magic number is, does this get the attention of the scouts and then they look at the other factors?
Thanks for the feedback. I love this website!!


fillsfan,

Yes, that will definetly get the attention of scouts and then they will look closer at everything else. Talent and tools are still and have always been #1.

I agree with "cheeseattheknees" when he talks about the tools being usable or shows tools at game speed. For example running speed can be great, but its much better if the speed is usable on the bases. However, if a player has excellent tools and scouts know who he is, he will be a draft prospect. They would rather have the guy with MLB tools and teach him the rest, than have a guy who has everything else except lacks the neccessary tools.
I relate it to a hitter who jumps out because he doesn't have the ability to manage his adrenaline, or, because he doesn't trust how quick he really is. He's the guy who puts on the power display during BP, then struggles at game time.

Or, the pitcher who rushes forward and the arm lags causing him to be out of synch. Yet, in a bullpen session, everything is impressive.

Those with tools and the ability to manage to manage their adrenaline and/or anxiety are the special ones.
Last edited by cheeseattheknees
Cheese,

Excellent points, to add something else to what you've mentioned...

quote by cheeseattheknees
quote:
Those who get drafted are those who show the tools at game speed.


The game changes speed at every level. You have to "project" or predict if a player has the ability and makeup to make the adjustments all the way to the top. Game speed can be very different and it's always somewhat of a prediction, in most cases, whether or not someone will be able to play at Major League "game speed". That is where the tools are important... in making a good prediction.

Everyone likes to see players compete against the best possible competition. That helps answer a lot of questions. It's also the reason many high school and some college players don't succeed at the professional level. For example, when you see a player hit with wood against good 90+ or quality breaking balls it means much more than hitting against average high school pitching.

BTW, just to be clear... I'm very big on good kids! To me that is much more important than being a good baseball player. Just trying to give an honest opinion to the original question.

Here's another old scouting saying...

"Tools get you drafted, but makeup gets you to the Big Leagues"
Some players even change their makeup (as I relate it) depending on the situation.

How many times do you see a MLB player succeed on a small market team. Then go to NY or Boston, and crumble under the pressure of the big markets. They return to the small market, and BAM, they're good again.

Other players thrive in the big moment. They control the adrenaline....slow the game down.
Yes, it is crazy! Should give people an idea of just how difficult (unscientific) scouting can be sometimes. Finding the raw physical talent is the easiest part. Some just can't make the neccessary adjustments while others can for some reason. Some thrive on the big stage while others don't.

Scott Kazmir always impressed me as a big game kid who would be at his best in the 7th game of a World Series. Hope he gets that chance someday.

Cheese, I've really enjoyed reading your great thoughts on this topic. Hope you stick around for a long time.
a little off topic but cheesesatheknees made me think of an article writen about josh hamilton. it kind of high lighted his rookie season. when he reached either AA or AAA, he was playing in front of 4 or 5 thousand people. and they were ragging on him about his signing bonus and he wasn't worth the money etc.


i don't know how you ready your self for that situation? fans can be brutal, it must be tough for young players to take. along with the fact at some point they are going to struggle at a level. things you can't really practice for but are there. i guess it's all part of the master plan.
Last edited by 20dad
Cheeseattheknees and PGStaff make alot of sense. A players has to show his tools in game situations. When top notch tools are shown against top notch competition is when a player is noticed and subsequently drafted. Basically what your saying is playing well under pressure is a huge indicator for scouts.
On the Perfect Game website there is a video clip of Scott Kazmir throwing some nasty fastballs and sliders at a major tournament. Thats what you guys are talking about and thats why he was drafted in the first round. Thanks again.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×