Skip to main content

The one who already has good tools but doesn't have much potential and won't improve much or any, or the one who doesn't have the tools and needs quite a bit of instruction, but has plenty of potential and will improve alot?
"He threw the ball as far from the bat and as close to the plate as possible." Casey Stengel about Satchel Paige
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Mr3000 ...
What is your definition of potential in your question? I am having difficulty with the concept of a prospect having no tools but potential with a lot of improvement ahead.

In the minors, my gut feeling is that both can play a 'valuable' role .. the player with not much potential but good tools can be a valuable 'filler' for the organization whereas the player with lots of potential may develop into a valuable player at the highest levels. JMHO
redbird5 I was being facetious. I even used the little smiley face…????

That’s what I get for trying to make a salient point regarding the 5 tools and player potential. I know just enough about the 5 tools to keep silent and let the experts post. However, I do know that the priority of these tools is a moving target. They change given the position and the team’s ability and needs. Every team needs intelligence and true team spirit. I could have metaphorically suggested hustle.

“This is not an easy game. To be a champion, you have to invest a little extra.” ~ Pete Rose

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×