I'm surprised there's no discussion. Anybody from here down there?
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
quote:Originally posted by RJM:
Let's compare two kids:
quote:Originally posted by RJM:
I see the only value of a tournament like the Elite 24 at younger ages to be the thrill of competing. I find how a player compares to other players and players from other parts of the country to be irrelevant until they all physically develop. At thirteen and fourteen years old (or any baseball age before the teens) a kid can be physically +/- three years of his actual age.
Let's compare two kids:
12U: 5'8", 170 v. 5', 95
13U: 5'8", 170 v. 5'2", 105
14U: 5'8", 180 v. 5'4", 110
15U fallball: 5'8", 180 v. 5'9", 135
Which kid do you think is more likely to be the player in high school? The first kid's dad is 5'6". His mother is 5'2". The second kid's dad is 6'1". His mother is 5'8".
"If you take the trouble to compare your player's talent and tools (as opposed to his stats or performance) to the better players in the tournament, it is possible to get a pretty good calibration of his potential."quote:Originally posted by Tiger Paw Mom:quote:Originally posted by RJM:
I see the only value of a tournament like the Elite 24 at younger ages to be the thrill of competing. I find how a player compares to other players and players from other parts of the country to be irrelevant until they all physically develop. At thirteen and fourteen years old (or any baseball age before the teens) a kid can be physically +/- three years of his actual age.
Let's compare two kids:
12U: 5'8", 170 v. 5', 95
13U: 5'8", 170 v. 5'2", 105
14U: 5'8", 180 v. 5'4", 110
15U fallball: 5'8", 180 v. 5'9", 135
Which kid do you think is more likely to be the player in high school? The first kid's dad is 5'6". His mother is 5'2". The second kid's dad is 6'1". His mother is 5'8".
What does this have to do with the original post?
"If you take the trouble to compare your player's talent and tools (as opposed to his stats or performance) to the better players in the tournament, it is possible to get a pretty good calibration of his potential."quote:Originally posted by GapFinder:
I know I am kind of slow. But I am following that the teams at the Elite 24 are some of the best teams in the country, and those teams have some of the best players on the teams. And by watching those players one could see compareing the skills and tools of players on those teams, including your own.
But,,,
I am not sure I am following,what the post about the sizes of two kids has to do with this thread about the Elite 24. Where these kids at the Elite 24.
The origonal poster stated "If you take the trouble to compare your player's talent and tools (as opposed to his stats or performance) to the better players in the tournament, it is possible to get a pretty good calibration of his potential." I gave the examples of two baseball players. One who is physically imposing at 13U and one that isn't. One is an early bloomer. One is a physical late bloomer. The larger kid may be done growing at 5'8". The late bloomer will probably grow to be 6'2". The late bloomer will most likely become a better baseball player and a better college prospect (assuming either become prospects) despite the early bloomer would be the kid far more likely to dominate a 13U game. Bottom line: You can't decide who the studs are at 13/14U. The two kids are an example why. It doesn't sense the futures can be determined when a large majority of players haven't passed through puberty and developed by 13U/14U.quote:Originally posted by GapFinder:
But back to TPM question, how does posting the height and weight of 2 kid have relivance to this thread?
quote:Originally posted by GapFinder:
But back to TPM question, how does posting the height and weight of 2 kid have relivance to this thread?