Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I don't know if that's true or if we're just the first to post publicly.  But bear in mind, it's not a race.  Even on just our one team, Cayman is not the first 2016 to get an offer.  Just the first to reach the point where he was confident that he was ready to take this particular offer.  Similarly, I suspect there are guys on the Canes who could commit right now if they were ready.

 

It's awful darned early for a 2016, and we do counsel being patient unless you're looking at a special opportunity.  But UVA is pretty special for the ball player looking to combine the highest academic opportunity with the highest level of baseball and to get the in-state break as well.  Sometimes there's no reason to wait!

Congrats to Cayman.  He's a talented player.

While I completely agree that it's not a race, we already have 2 ACC commits in the 2016 class. I agree with Brad that it is AWFULLY early to commit to a school for 2016's. We counsel our kids to evaluate all options prior to committing. At last count, we have 22 2016's evaluating offers. This should be a good class.

Redbird, let us know who has good news to report!

 

The only other 2016 from VA that PG's site shows as having committed is Fluvanna OF Jalen Harrison, who's on his way to UVA according to that site.  Harrison plays for Billy Wagner's team and was also listed on the Ft. Myers roster for the Indiana Prospects, though he apparently did not end up going to Ft. Myers so I'm not sure whether or not he's ever played for them.  I'm also not clear on whether Harrison is still at Fluvanna HS or whether he has transferred to STAB.  Then there's also the question of whether he'll stick in baseball, as apparently he's a big football star as well.

Jaylen Harrison is at STAB and just finished football and started basketball yesterday. As the privates normally do they repeat a year so he went from 2015 to 2016. His deal with UVA does allow for football and if he were to grow 3 more inches Tony Bennett might want to look at him on the hardwood. He played in a couple of events with the Prospects after Billy's team shut it down for the summer but I have not heard what team he is playing for this summer. Billy Wagner is the head coach at The Miller School in western Albemarle and they are putting in a turf surface for their field. Good kid with a lot of options.mWhich is nice.

Originally Posted by JustaDad:
I'm new to all this, but I'm a bit confused about the recruiting of underclassman.  How exactly are high school freshman and sophomores committing to colleges?  Isn't there a rule prohibiting verbal offers until after July 1 of a recruit's junior year?  How can a 2016 graduate have 'deal' that allows for football.   


As far as the NCAA is concerned, verbals don't count for anything.  There is no obligation on either side. Either party can walk away at any time.

There is no such thing as an "offer" until it is in writing.
Originally Posted by Rob T:
Originally Posted by JustaDad:
I'm new to all this, but I'm a bit confused about the recruiting of underclassman.  How exactly are high school freshman and sophomores committing to colleges?  Isn't there a rule prohibiting verbal offers until after July 1 of a recruit's junior year?  How can a 2016 graduate have 'deal' that allows for football.   


As far as the NCAA is concerned, verbals don't count for anything.  There is no obligation on either side. Either party can walk away at any time.

There is no such thing as an "offer" until it is in writing.

Thanks Rob.  So a DI coach can verbally tell a player that they want them to play ball for their school three years in advance?  But neither the player or coach are committed to anything, including scholarships?  Seems like a bigger risk for the kids than the schools.  Is that the case for DIII schools as well? 

Originally Posted by JustaDad:
 

Thanks Rob.  So a DI coach can verbally tell a player that they want them to play ball for their school three years in advance?  But neither the player or coach are committed to anything, including scholarships?  Seems like a bigger risk for the kids than the schools.  Is that the case for DIII schools as well? 

 

Others will give you additional information, but as I understand it there are no athletic scholarships given in DIII. 

Originally Posted by JustaDad:
Originally Posted by Rob T:
Originally Posted by JustaDad:
I'm new to all this, but I'm a bit confused about the recruiting of underclassman.  How exactly are high school freshman and sophomores committing to colleges?  Isn't there a rule prohibiting verbal offers until after July 1 of a recruit's junior year?  How can a 2016 graduate have 'deal' that allows for football.   


As far as the NCAA is concerned, verbals don't count for anything.  There is no obligation on either side. Either party can walk away at any time.

There is no such thing as an "offer" until it is in writing.

Thanks Rob.  So a DI coach can verbally tell a player that they want them to play ball for their school three years in advance?  But neither the player or coach are committed to anything, including scholarships?  Seems like a bigger risk for the kids than the schools.  Is that the case for DIII schools as well? 

Div 3 schools don't have athletic scholarships.  Anything from those schools is need/academic based.

 

As I see it there really isn't risk either way unless the player is foolish enough to not bother to look at other schools once they get their "commitment".  

Originally Posted by Rob T:
Originally Posted by JustaDad:
Originally Posted by Rob T:
Originally Posted by JustaDad:
I'm new to all this, but I'm a bit confused about the recruiting of underclassman.  How exactly are high school freshman and sophomores committing to colleges?  Isn't there a rule prohibiting verbal offers until after July 1 of a recruit's junior year?  How can a 2016 graduate have 'deal' that allows for football.   


As far as the NCAA is concerned, verbals don't count for anything.  There is no obligation on either side. Either party can walk away at any time.

There is no such thing as an "offer" until it is in writing.

Thanks Rob.  So a DI coach can verbally tell a player that they want them to play ball for their school three years in advance?  But neither the player or coach are committed to anything, including scholarships?  Seems like a bigger risk for the kids than the schools.  Is that the case for DIII schools as well? 

Div 3 schools don't have athletic scholarships.  Anything from those schools is need/academic based.

 

As I see it there really isn't risk either way unless the player is foolish enough to not bother to look at other schools once they get their "commitment".  

Thanks guys.  

Originally Posted by Rob T:
 
 "There is no such thing as an "offer" until it is in writing."
....As I see it there really isn't risk either way unless the player is foolish enough to not bother to look at other schools once they get their "commitment".  

JustaDad, welcome!

 

Somewhat off topic but since we are talking about 2016s, YES, an offer can be made that is not in writing.  If an offer is made and the offer is accepted it is called a verbal COMMITMENT.  (The legal part, in writing, is the NLI which arrives mid-Nov senior year for early commits).

 

 A coach will verbally commit money and set aside that money for your player.  The player will commit to come play for that school, and take himself off the market for recruiting.  If the coach finds out that his recruit is looking elsewhere, it is the player that is breaking the commitment.  It is told many times on this site that baseball is a small world, so don't make a verbal commitment unless you plan to keep it.  Otherwise, hold the offer as long as you can without making the commitment unless you are sure.  But don't expect the coaches to hold out the offer forever.

 

Verbal offers happen all the time and is the norm these days. When your WRITTEN NLI comes in the mail, just make sure it is the same scholarship offer that was discussed. Baseball coaches will loose their good reputations if it is different!

 

You do hear about a few players, and schools, changing their minds after the verbal commitments, but not too many.

Last edited by keewart

NO NO NO NO NO!!!!

 

Rob T's post is terribly, terriby wrong and Justadad, you should not rely on that at all.

 

It is true that the NCAA will not enforce any scholarship agreements until they are confirmed with the signing of the NLI during a prescribed signing period.  And we are now in the fall or so-called "early" signing period for seniors in baseball.

 

But this is not like football, where players sometimes get surprise NLI's to consider.  In baseball, the NLI's are the confirmations of deals struck in advance of the signing period, often quite a bit before the signing period as you can see.  And while either side can renege on a pre-NLI handshake deal without any NCAA penalties, for a school to do that can sometimes injure its program's reputation (and therefore its ability to land other recruits), and for a player to do that can make him persona non grata with a lot of programs.  So it's a HUGE mistake to treat the handshake deals as if you can just make 'em and break 'em with impunity. 

 

The big danger of Rob T's advice is that it might lull you into thinking you can wait until your son's a senior to get serious about recruiting.  As you can see, some slots are already being taken in the sophomore class.  The longer you wait, the more risk you run that your favored school fills your son's position before he gets there.  Of course, every year many players get recruited even during their senior season, and even in the summer after HS graduation. But the percentage of roster spots filled that way is very, very small, and it is not smart for a player who aspires to college ball to sit things out and just hope it all sorts out his senior year.

Last edited by Midlo Dad
Originally Posted by Midlo Dad:

NO NO NO NO NO!!!!

 

Rob T's post is terribly, terriby wrong and Justadad, you should not rely on that at all.

 

 

I'd go with the advice that the 14 year old softball player that committed gave in the article from one of the other topics...

 

“They offered me last Sunday, and I committed a day after,” Roper said. “The coach already said if I go there and I don’t like the campus, I can de-commit. But it’s kind of an unspoken rule once you verbally commit somewhere, you don’t really re-commit somewhere else.”

Also:

 

A player who has committed to a D1 is playing with fire big time if he continues to shop around after giving his word.  That will really tick off the coaches at the school you've committed to.  That very well might lead them to consider their deal cancelled.  (Different situation, though, if the school undergoes a change of coaches.)  It's terribly important not to commit until you're sure you have the right fit, so that you can stop looking and stop worrying about it and not have this problem. 

 

With D3's, it's fairly common for the coaches to try to ID players of interest and follow them closely.  They have a good idea of who is going to end up going D1, who isn't, or who may be "on the bubble".  As we reach this time of year, a lot of kids who had their hearts set on a D1 deal are realizing that it's not going to happen for them.  With that, many of them find good future homes at D3 schools. 

 

I don't want to see this post hijacked, but please study many discussions on the recruiting thread for more thorough info.  Also, there is a lot of info on HSBBW's home page (off the bulletin boards).

Originally Posted by Midlo Dad:

NO NO NO NO NO!!!!

 

Rob T's post is terribly, terriby wrong and Justadad, you should not rely on that at all.

Sorry you feel that way - and I don't disagree with your feelings on "commitment".  However - I think as early (and I'm talking  freshmen/sophomores here) "commitments" become more common you are going to see more and more "broken" commitments. From both sides.

 

I'm not saying a player should be taking OV's and such.  I'm saying he has to be aware that situations change. If he just blindly accepts that in 3-4 years he will have a scholarship waiting for him - no matter what - then he is being foolish.  The same goes for the coach.

 

With limited scholarships, how hard will it to be for a coach to waste one on a player he bet on 4 years prior that just didn't pan out? I would venture most coaches will stick with their word - but some aren't.

 

So what's the player to do?  

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×