Ted,
I know you asked PGStaff his opinion, and I'm certainly not him, but as the parent of a 2017 class kid, I'll share why I don't like it.
First, simply looking at the "risk" factor, all the risk is on the kid. Once he commits, contact with other schools pretty much comes to a complete halt. The opportunity to meet other coaches, make contacts, build relationships, visit other campuses, etc., ends, so if the original commitment falls through, there may be little to fall back on and paving the way to do so will be more difficult as the kid doesn't have a rolodex of solid contacts to reach out to. Saw this first hand with the change in the Auburn coaching regime. Several kids were on outside looking in after having given their verbals. Some found homes at much smaller schools/conferences and almost all landed with less athletic money than they had committed to prior.
Second, the kids simply don't know what they want in a school, coach, environment, major, etc., etc. A kid that hasn't even gotten a learner's permit is supposed to know what he wants in secondary education? If so, that's a rare kid. The further out the commitment occurs from the kid landing on campus, the greater chance of a mismatch.
Finally, the NCAA hasn't caught up with what's going on in the recruiting front. This is why I believe the landscape will begin to look like other sports. Case in point, baseball players cannot go on official visits until classes being their senior year. Most top prospects have verballed long before then. So they go on one of their five allowable official visits as more of a victory lap to the school in which they've committed, and typically don't use any of the other officials allowed. In my kid's case, we didn't make any visits to any schools outside of a one-day drive from home. Although many schools that would have required a flight had high interest, I wasn't going to foot the bill unless it was a HIGH desire on my son's part to attend that school. So you rule out even visiting some great places and schools and fish in the pond in your neighborhood. Also, official visits are a reward to kids that have worked hard and have nurtured their talent. They are robbed to a degree by not being able to take advantage of these visits. In the other two major sports, you see committed kids taking official visits long after their commitment.
Just a few reasons that I don't like it All the downside is to the kid and none to the schools. As PG mentioned, a high draft kid will be a high draft kid, regardless of when he committed, so the schools are going to lose those players anyway. Kids who don't develop as expected simply won't get their NLI come signing day (or a reduced one).
A solution to all this could take place in three steps.
- No offers allowed to students prior to first day of classes sophomore school year
- Official visits allowed following completion of freshman school year
- Verbal offer must be accompanied with NLI at time of offer. This means whatever a school offers on that day, can be binding (if player signs), and the school is on the hook. This adds significant risk to schools to offer early.