quote:
Originally posted by CPLZ:
quote:
Originally posted by ncball:
Finally, "unofficial visits" are a joke as a rule. They are choreographed as much as any official visit (as a rule) and border on illegal. The top players come away from those "unofficials" with an offer that is "good" for a certain amount of time and then they will be pulled "off the table". That really bothers me! This is a huge decision for a student-athlete and his family and to be pressured is just wrong! I wish there could be some formal legislation against this type of thing by the NCAA.
ncball,
I'm not sure what you object to? As was stated earlier, the timeline for recruiting has been advanced for the top players. There is nothing unscrupulous about making an offer to a recruit during an unofficial visit. All offers come with deadlines, always have. The coach needs to know whether you're his guy or he has to move on to the next recruit in line. That's the same as it is in the business world. No school or business would make an open ended offer, decide whenever you want. Wouldn't it be just as unfair to the school to string them along for time infinity? It's not for the pressure, it's for a decision...in or out, because if you're not in, then you're out and the school needs to move on.
The only difference between official and unofficial is if the school picks up the tab for the visit.
cplz- I have an average of about 20-22 players from my baseball club who get D1 scholarships every year. I talk to probably 10 colleges a week- more during the fall before early signing period. This is not to brag but to give you a reference point on my point of view dealing with these school and the families in my program.
Here's what I don't like- My top guys can wait until signing day and they are going to get their scholarship at top dollar. It's the next line of guys. They get recruited, go on an unofficial, and are told they have a week to make a decision or they are going to lose that offer. Many times this is the spring of their junior year.
Well, my problem is that student-athletes need to make a decision that is going to affect the rest of their lives. This is not a four year decision- it's a 40 year decision! What if that kid hasn't seen any other schools? These kids feel pressure and inevitably rush in to a quick decisions- many times the wrong one. They are now stuck with a bad decision for four years. Why?
There's no questions that both schools and student-athletes are being pressured to make snap judgments and are making poor decisions. You mentioned that they have always made offers that had deadlines. True. The difference is that these offers were made closer to the early signing period and student-athletes could make a more educated decision based on doing more research.
Finally, there is a BIG difference in what is legal and illegal in unofficial trips. It's not just who picks up the tab. These unofficials are not designed to be like official visits yet that's exactly what they have become.
My suggestion is that they allow official visits to baseball players in the spring of their junior year (to reflect the earlier signing period as compared to football) and not allow official or unofficial offers until after that time frame (summer). My hope is that both student-athletes and schools will not be rushed in making poor decisions- because they are in the way it is set up now!