Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I saw the celebration and was touched by the thoughts of Nick.

However, I was more than a little bothered by the misguided celebratory drenching of his jersey. Given that Nick's murderer was extremely drunk, it was very inappropriate in my opinion.

I never really understood the 0rgy of alcohol at these winning moments. I think it has gotten way out of hand. With all the media coverage of the celebrations, it seems that it is here to stay, and will only get more ridiculous. Is anyone really entertained watching this stuff?
Last edited by infidel_08
The picture of the team pouring beer all over Adenhart's jersy was the front page pitcure in our newspaper (OC Register). I cried when I saw it. I thought it was wonderful that the team would include Nick in celebratory beer he most certainly would want to have participated in.

It made me feel like Nick would have loved it, would have loved being a part of it... and made me really sad that he is missing it.
You know I read this earlier this morning and thought it was kinda cool. I've read it again a few times tonight and really I'm not sure what to think.

I think it is neat that they included him in that way. It's tragic irony I think. I guess while it could definitely be taken the wrong way, the thought is what matters most and they did it with the best of intentions...
The Angels would have celebrated that way even if the tragedy had never occured or if Nick had never played for them. They celebrated in the way they had the previous two years. Unfortunately the tragedy happened and Nick is no longer with them physically but he is there in spirit. He was in the middle of that celebration last night. My personal opinion is that it was appropriate because they included and honored Nick.
What would have been the reaction had the team not celebrated in the traditional way baseball teams have celebrated such things for decades?

Had they done something different, not sprayed each other with champaign and beer like we have seen time and again over the years, it would have been seen as using a sports event to make a political statement.

A political statement that I agree with. But still, it would have politicized something that was really about something that isn't political at all, the love of a teammate.

These guys loved Nick. The FIRST thing on their mind when winning the division was to show their love for Nick. They celebrated as if he was there, as if he was a part of their joy at that moment, because in their minds, he WAS.

I am glad they made Nick a part of their celebration.
None of us know what the after life will look or be like, other than what we read in Scripture, but Nick Adenhart was a baseball player. We all know lots of them, whether high school, college, or pros. If you consider the circle of players you personally know, you know that Nick's take on it would be "that's just so cool". Every player would feel the same.

I had no problem with the celebration. They loved the guy, they acted like a bunch of kids, not millionaires, and did what their hearts led them to do. That's just fine at any level.
I've had a really hard time reading this and trying to respond.
I think that Nick would have thought it was ok. They did the right thing, and they did what they thought was best, not what other may have thought, that's what counts.

How can one not root for the Angels this post season? I hope he lifts them to a championship. What they have done is amazing.
quote:
hokieone quote:
If you consider the circle of players you personally know, you know that Nick's take on it would be "that's just so cool". Every player would feel the same.


Great look hokieone!

Most of those critics have never sat in a lockeroom and shared the "blood-sweat-n-tears" a team endures. In general, it's so easy to sit behind a keyboard spew blither yet remain unaccountable and/or cop-out and claim to be misunderstood Roll Eyes.
Last edited by rz1
quote:
Originally posted by rz1:
quote:
hokieone quote:
If you consider the circle of players you personally know, you know that Nick's take on it would be "that's just so cool". Every player would feel the same.


Great look hokieone!

Most of those critics have never sat in a lockeroom and shared the "blood-sweat-n-tears" a team endures. In general, it's so easy to sit behind a keyboard spew blither yet remain unaccountable and/or cop-out and claim to be misunderstood Roll Eyes.


I agree about the good point and what you put rz1 and would like to add to it. Most people don't know what it's like to lose a team mate the way the Angels did. They don't know / understand the dynamics of the relationships created and how devastated things become when that person is no longer there. They can handle trades or being released or sent down to AAA because it happens all the time but to lose someone is something you don't know how you're going to handle it until it happens. You can't (and shouldn't) plan for this type of loss.

Some people choose to be sad and somber over the loss of someone while others choose to laugh and talk about all the good times they had with that person - there is nothing wrong with either perspective because it's how to cope with the loss. The Angels chose to cope with the loss of Nick by "including" him in their season and then "including" him in their celebration.

I'm going to bet that if you ask any of the Angels or Nick's dad they would say that Nick was on that field celebrating with his "family". Because that is what good teams are - "family".

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×