quote:
Originally posted by Clint Taylor:
I'm not sure the traditionally top performing programs would agree with your logic.
2006-2009 Baylor has three recruiting classes ranked top 10...results=nothing. This is not uncommon.
The point is, that ranking recruiting classes is basically done one of two ways....
Collegiate Baseball Magazine basically does it on the size of the recruiting class...which is why Oregon, with a brand new program and 35 new recruits, was rated a top 10 class last year.
BA does it based on the number of draft picks a team gets. Based on the fact that 50% of first rounders never make MLB, that tells you that even the greatest minds in the business have a hard time picking winners.
Rice is a good example of getting unknown/undrafted home boys, coached up. Gotta hand it to a guy like Wayne Graham (and he's just one example of many) who can take overlooked players that they see something in, get them coached up, and win and get them drafted.
The only people that really believe recruiting class rankings mean anything are the university PR offices. Coaches will use them as propaganda, but that doesn't mean they believe in them.
They don't have any value, because there is no relation of achievement of either the individual or the school, based on the ranking of their recruiting class.