Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by jjk:
For a PO at 2B, if the "pivot foot" pops anywhere but "straight back" off the rubber then a balk is in the making.
If your question is directed at the lack of stopping (coming set) then all is fine, F1 does not have to come set prior to a PO.


The pivot doesn't have to go straight back off the rubber to pick at 2B anymore than it has to go straight back to pick at 1B.
quote:
Originally posted by bballdad175:
quote:
Originally posted by jjk:
For a PO at 2B, if the "pivot foot" pops anywhere but "straight back" off the rubber then a balk is in the making.
If your question is directed at the lack of stopping (coming set) then all is fine, F1 does not have to come set prior to a PO.


The pivot doesn't have to go straight back off the rubber to pick at 2B anymore than it has to go straight back to pick at 1B.


I believe jjk's point was when disengaging the rubber prior to a throw to second, one must legally disengage. This also applies to first and third.

Obviously, requiring a disengagement to be legal is not the same as requiring a disengagement.
quote:
Originally posted by bballdad175:
quote:
Originally posted by jjk:
For a PO at 2B, if the "pivot foot" pops anywhere but "straight back" off the rubber then a balk is in the making.
If your question is directed at the lack of stopping (coming set) then all is fine, F1 does not have to come set prior to a PO.


The pivot doesn't have to go straight back off the rubber to pick at 2B anymore than it has to go straight back to pick at 1B.


OK, so I'm confused.

I was under the impression that there is no requirement for a pitcher to disengage the rubber to throw to a base, as long as he steps toward the base prior to the throw?

But maybe I missed the point of the original post. It's late for me. Difficult to read. Smile
Last edited by bballdad175

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×