quote:
Originally posted by bbfan10: (atuff deleted) But in my opinion like I posted before to compare BC as a team to some of the elite programs in the country you should win in your own area 1st.
Interesting criteria - and probably worth discussing outside of the context of this north vs south war that seems to have kicked in...
bbfan suggests that for a team to be "elite" it must have won its CIF sectional title. There is real merit in that argument - after all, winning a CIF sectional title does identify excellent teams. I do have two concerns:
1) it suggests that all of the other teams are "not elite". Of course, we all know of teams that have run into a hot pitcher or some other oddity in this one and done format. Imagine the MLB world series being decided by a CIF style playoff - how often would the best team win the title? I'll try to avoid thinking about the 2002 Angels
2) It bases elite status based upon what last year's team did - not the capabilities of this year's squad. I don't have a better criteria for on the field measurement of a HS team at this point in the year. D1 scholarships assumes that D1 is the desired goal of every player - and also only counts the seniors or the very early signing underclassman.
Regardless, I do think that quality baseball teams can be found all over the state - and that we should be celebrating that the game remains healthy and that so many wonderful players can be seen essentially for free.
08dad
P.S. By the "must have won CIF criteria", MTS needs to also exit this discussion with his school as it has been several years since his school won a CIF Sectional Title.
P.P.S. My alma mater has 7 titles total and 3 in the last 3 years - I get to keep talking