Skip to main content

7th grader (13U) is transitioning to a BBCOR bat for summer. Tall and lanky kid who is a gap to gap line drive hitter. Every bat I read about or see on you tube is the best bat on the market....so...I'd like to know if there is anything particular I should look for in these bats for his type of hitting make up and if anyone can pass along some suggestions on 2013 or 2014 BBCOR bats it would be a great help. Frankly, I'm clueless and son has not been able to use many BBCOR bats to be able to compare. Thanks in advance everyone. 

Last edited by WestCoastPapa
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

BBCOR like other bats are either balance or end loaded. Depending on which type of bat your son likes a good balanced bat would be the Rawlings 5150 or the Easton S1. If he prefers an end loaded bat then something like the Easton XL1 or Demarini Vodoo. All these bats can be had quite inexpensively if looking at last years model. There are many other options out there just figure out which type of bat he likes (balanced or end loaded) and go from there. Hope this helps  

Originally Posted by WestCoastPapa:

7th grader (13U) is transitioning to a BBCOR bat for summer. Tall and lanky kid who is a gap to gap line drive hitter. Every bat I read about or see on you tube is the best bat on the market....so...I'd like to know if there is anything particular I should look for in these bats for his type of hitting make up and if anyone can pass along some suggestions on 2013 or 2014 BBCOR bats it would be a great help. Frankly, I'm clueless and son has not been able to use many BBCOR bats to be able to compare. Thanks in advance everyone. 

outside of the balance I don't believe there is much difference. my son is something of a junkie for bats, always has been. He buys his own and loves them...he has many of the big names - his key is he likes balance. He is currently swinging the S1 - it was accroding to him "the best bat ever" at the end of last year when he wanted it for Xmas - now the new Rawlings Velo is out and he demo'ed it somewhere - it the new greatest bat ever...of course he wants to walk away from the S1 that he has just cruched with all spring! LOL kids are dumb, i can't believe they don't realize a bat losses its hit over the offseason when a new one comes out not during the year!!

I guess the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

Originally Posted by SDN8:

A -5 XL1 is as end-loaded as bats come, and is actually a -3.5 if you put it on a scale. The BBCOR XL1 is actually a very balanced bat. If you look around a little on the internet, you can find MOI scales that rate BBCOR bats from lowest to highest.

XL1 I believe is Eastons End loaded model while the S1 is the balanced model.

 

http://baseball-stuff.com/easton-xl1-bbcor-review/

Last edited by standballdad
Originally Posted by standballdad:
Originally Posted by SDN8:

A -5 XL1 is as end-loaded as bats come, and is actually a -3.5 if you put it on a scale. The BBCOR XL1 is actually a very balanced bat. If you look around a little on the internet, you can find MOI scales that rate BBCOR bats from lowest to highest.

XL1 I believe is Eastons End loaded model while the S1 is the balanced model.

 

http://baseball-stuff.com/easton-xl1-bbcor-review/

Attached picture was put out on another board a few years ago by an Easton engineer and shows the MOI of BBCOR bats (of the time). Take for what you will. Having had a BBCOR XL1 in my hands, I don't feel the end load. The drop 5 XL1, end-loaded as a sledgehammer.

BBCOR MOI

Attachments

Images (1)
  • BBCOR MOI
Last edited by SDN8
Originally Posted by SDN8:
Originally Posted by standballdad:
Originally Posted by SDN8:

A -5 XL1 is as end-loaded as bats come, and is actually a -3.5 if you put it on a scale. The BBCOR XL1 is actually a very balanced bat. If you look around a little on the internet, you can find MOI scales that rate BBCOR bats from lowest to highest.

XL1 I believe is Eastons End loaded model while the S1 is the balanced model.

 

http://baseball-stuff.com/easton-xl1-bbcor-review/

Attached picture was put out on another board a few years ago by an Easton engineer and shows the MOI of BBCOR bats (of the time). Take for what you will. Having had a BBCOR XL1 in my hands, I don't feel the end load. The drop 5 XL1, end-loaded as a sledgehammer.

BBCOR MOINot sure where this data comes from, but I have swung many of the bats here. The CF5 is Demarinis balanced bat versus the Voodoo, and the Rawlings 5150 is also very balanced. I have swung the Easton XL1 and it is more end loaded than the 2 I just mentioned.    

standball,

I wonder if you have the source for that chart with the y-axis data.  I've seen variants of this type of chart, and usually the middle of the pack is around 100 (no unit of measure shown), and the upper and lower bounds are within +/- 5% or so.  In other words, although visually this chart makes the differences in bats look fairly dramatic, I suspect that the variability is very tight (within 5% or so).  I point this out because although I'm sure there are some differences between bats, I suspect the difference is magnified more by marketing than by science.

Originally Posted by Smitty28:

standball,

I wonder if you have the source for that chart with the y-axis data.  I've seen variants of this type of chart, and usually the middle of the pack is around 100 (no unit of measure shown), and the upper and lower bounds are within +/- 5% or so.  In other words, although visually this chart makes the differences in bats look fairly dramatic, I suspect that the variability is very tight (within 5% or so).  I point this out because although I'm sure there are some differences between bats, I suspect the difference is magnified more by marketing than by science.

Good point, I do not the where this charts or data was pulled from.

Originally Posted by standballdad:
Originally Posted by Smitty28:

standball,

I wonder if you have the source for that chart with the y-axis data.  I've seen variants of this type of chart, and usually the middle of the pack is around 100 (no unit of measure shown), and the upper and lower bounds are within +/- 5% or so.  In other words, although visually this chart makes the differences in bats look fairly dramatic, I suspect that the variability is very tight (within 5% or so).  I point this out because although I'm sure there are some differences between bats, I suspect the difference is magnified more by marketing than by science.

Good point, I do not the where this charts or data was pulled from.

Oops, that was posted by SDN8...

Originally Posted by Smitty28:
Originally Posted by standballdad:
Originally Posted by Smitty28:

standball,

I wonder if you have the source for that chart with the y-axis data.  I've seen variants of this type of chart, and usually the middle of the pack is around 100 (no unit of measure shown), and the upper and lower bounds are within +/- 5% or so.  In other words, although visually this chart makes the differences in bats look fairly dramatic, I suspect that the variability is very tight (within 5% or so).  I point this out because although I'm sure there are some differences between bats, I suspect the difference is magnified more by marketing than by science.

Good point, I do not the where this charts or data was pulled from.

Oops, that was posted by SDN8...

Originally came from the thread in the link below. Member who was at the time an engineer for Easton (now w/ Adidas) posted. See the 6th post. I don't know first-hand that this person is who they say they are, but they have proven knowledgeable on the topic over time.

 

http://www.baseball-bats.net/f...?8571-Balanced-BBCOR

 

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×