The comment under 7.09 (a) describes what happened in a collegiate summer game last night. Ball in the dirt, swung and missed for strike 3, blocked by the catcher, but bounces and hits batter-runner leaving box running to first. Does clearly hinders mean intentionally? When I read it, I took it to mean batter-runner intentionally kicks ball away from catcher or some similar scenario. However, standing by itself, the phrase clearly hinders could be interpreted that the batter-runner made it more difficult for the catcher to make a play. My first reaction was unintentional, play on. However, I'm just a dad who reads the rulebook, but I don't have a casebook. Ruling on the field was dead ball, batter out, runners return. Consensus was that there was no intent, just the way the ball bounced that hit the batter-runner.