Skip to main content

The perjury trial for Roger Clemens begins tomorrow a.m. (7/6).

Reading the article it seems that his best defense is to discredit Brian McNamee. While this cartoon character is a main focal point in this trial I am afraid that the absolute key person is long time friend Andy Petite.

How can they even try to discredit Petite when he admits that he (among others) got drugs from McNamee AND talked to Roger about drug use. (I had thought at one time it was reported that Petite saw Clemens get injected...??)

And don't EVEN bring Canseco into this trial because hindsight we all know he was telling the truth. Roger's defense team best leave him alone.

Talk about falling from such a lofty perch and crash and burn. My favorite all-time baseball player at one time who I so defiantly fought for his innocense when this first broke has just really let me and my son down with shame and disgrace.

Clemen's fight begins

"The difference between excellence and mediocrity is commitment." Twitter: @KwwJ829

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Agreed. Clemens was the template for my son's pitching mechanics. Who better to emulate than the ultimate power pitcher? It's all very disappointing.

I'm not condoning what he did. But this is basically a show trial. If we prosecuted everyone who lied to congress every legislator and lobbyist on the hill would be on trial. Surely there are worse sleazeballs they could be going after.
Last edited by MTH
Clemens had an opportunity to come clean, and speak the truth to Congress He declined to do either IMHO. I have very little sympathy for him at this point. What he did was his fault and no one elses. If he is proven innocent, I'm fine with that too. I'm looking forward to the trial.

I'm pretty sure I'm in the minority here, but I think Jose Conseco will be treated differently as the years go by. I have yet to find anything he said in his book to be false. Yes, he wrote the book to make money which I have no problem with. Others may view that differently. However, Conseco gets cast off as the nut job as the steroid era unfolded. He told us what was going on, nobody listened. His book really opened my eyes as to whom really has power in MLB. It is still one of my favorite baseball books written because it really turned the baseball establishment upside down. He deserves a lot more credit than he has ever received to date.
quote:
Originally posted by fenwaysouth:
Clemens had an opportunity to come clean, and speak the truth to Congress He declined to do either IMHO. I have very little sympathy for him at this point. What he did was his fault and no one elses. If he is proven innocent, I'm fine with that too. I'm looking forward to the trial.

I'm pretty sure I'm in the minority here, but I think Jose Conseco will be treated differently as the years go by. I have yet to find anything he said in his book to be false. Yes, he wrote the book to make money which I have no problem with. Others may view that differently. However, Conseco gets cast off as the nut job as the steroid era unfolded. He told us what was going on, nobody listened. His book really opened my eyes as to whom really has power in MLB. It is still one of my favorite baseball books written because it really turned the baseball establishment upside down. He deserves a lot more credit than he has ever received to date.


I agree with everything you said about Canseco... he's still a nut job Eek Big Grin Mad
Last edited by cabbagedad
Heard something interesting today:

The prosecution wants to have Pettitte and Knoblauch testify that they had also been given steroids by the trainer.

The judge initially said this testimony would be prejudicial, since the jury should not assume that just since other players took drugs from the guy, Clemens did also.

But Clemens' defense is that the trainer set him up in order to keep the Yankees from firing him due to the allegation that hung over him of a rape charge.

In other words, the goods the trainer has on Clemens (according to this legal defense theory) was an insurance policy against the Yankees firing him.

But, oops! If that is the defense's theory, then it makes no sense at all for the trainer to have given drugs to Pettitte and Knoblauch and then have manufactured a lie about Clemens for job protection - the ONE guy who hasn't admitted to using the drugs!

So the judge allowed the testimony of Pettitte and Knoblauch. Clemens defense theory itself has resulted in allowing perhaps the most damaging evidence against him.
The judge will still instruct the jury that anything that the trainer did with the other players CANNOT be considered as proof of guilt on Clemens part. The question is whether they will actually listen to the instruction. I certainly wouldn't count on it.

quote:
Originally posted by Rob Kremer:
So the judge allowed the testimony of Pettitte and Knoblauch. Clemens defense theory itself has resulted in allowing perhaps the most damaging evidence against him.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×