quote:
I respectfully disagree....scenario: player a is never late, never a disruption, always works hard, etc, etc, etc and somehow manages to miss a team meeting. player b is always just barely on time, doesn't work very hard, is a bad teammate, etc, etc, etc and somehow manages to miss the same team meeting
I think the key is not to paint yourself in a corner, as a coach. Don't have too many rules; the rules you do have should be broad in scope and allow you "wiggle room" if need be, yet don't portray you as one who
plays favorites. Rule making and enforcement is a bit of an art, IMO.
My college coach, who is arguably one of the best in the country, told us in our first team meeting in August (paraphrase): There are different rules for different people . . . If you're the Friday night starter who is 9-0 w/ a 2.60 ERA and you miss curfew on a Monday night, . . . slap on the wrist. If you are a part-time defensive replacement, batting .167, and were arrested on DUI in the Fall, and YOU miss curfew on Monday . . . your punishment is more severe.
For me, at 18, hearing that was a breath of fresh air. The real world operates that way. Prior to college, most coaches I had in every sport at every level enforced rules differently depending on the value of the player(s) in question, though they stated in the first team meeting, "everyone will be treated the same, regardless of who you/your parents are." As players, we all knew who was treated differently. I still have a great deal of respect for this coach 12 years later b/c he was upfront with this on day 1.
I know from experience this type of rule enforcement is much more tricky to effectively encact at the sub-collegiate levels.