Skip to main content

My son has recently experienced an elbow injury.  Immediately after the injury, the trainer performed a battery of tests to determine if the UCL has been compromised or torn.  He passed these tests and given the pain was in the back of the elbow, we did not concern ourselves with the UCL.  After two weeks of rest, he began light tossing but was feeling tightness or pulling in his forearm.  We immediately scheduled an MRI. 

The radiologists report indicated a complete tear of the proximal area of the UCL.  The orthopedic, a well respected sports ortho, disagreed with that reading.  We sought a second orthopedic's opinion only to find that he concurred with the radiologist.  Needless to say, we are puzzled.  He passed the clinical exams by all those who administered them.  He never felt pain on the side of his elbow, only the back.  When he started to throw after the initial 2 weeks rest, he was throwing 90% from 120 feet.  He has no pain and the tightness was all but gone the last day he threw.  

 

I wonder if anyone else has heard of a situation of a complete tear where there is no pain in the area and the athlete can pass the clinical exams?  Can it be the MRI gave a false indication of a tear where 2 of the 3 doctors were misled?  We are now seeking a 3rd orthopedic opinion but that seems ridiculous.  Can't they scope it to determine if it's torn before surgery?  I had no idea there was more art than science when it comes to medicine.    

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Tim B,

 

I'm not a doctor, just a parent who has some experience with his son's elbow pain.  IMO, an accurate diagnosis of a torn UCL requires an extremely skilled orthopedic surgeon, and even they don't get it right sometimes.

 

Was the clinical exam a valgus stress test?  If so, I think a "positive" result would usually include pain, but can also be increased range of valgus movement alone (joint is loose).

 

Did the MRI include a contrast agent?  That greatly increases the chances of an accurate reading.

 

I believe the issue with a diagnostic arthroscopy is usually insurance.  If you want to pay for one, that may be on option.

 

How old is your son?

 

Originally Posted by MidAtlanticDad:

Tim B,

 

I'm not a doctor, just a parent who has some experience with his son's elbow pain.  IMO, an accurate diagnosis of a torn UCL requires an extremely skilled orthopedic surgeon, and even they don't get it right sometimes.

 

Was the clinical exam a valgus stress test?  If so, I think a "positive" result would usually include pain, but can also be increased range of valgus movement alone (joint is loose).

 

Did the MRI include a contrast agent?  That greatly increases the chances of an accurate reading.

 

I believe the issue with a diagnostic arthroscopy is usually insurance.  If you want to pay for one, that may be on option.

 

How old is your son?

 

Thank you for your reply.  He is 15 years old. He had the Valgas Stress test administered by two orthopedics and one trainer. He had no pain and normal range of motion.  The MRI was done without contrast.  We are pursuing a third opinion.  I think it is possible the 2nd opinion was done without viewing the MRI itself, only the paper copies of the images.   

Here are my thoughts, being the dad of a player who had Tommy John surgery and who has been around quite a few other players who have.  First, you should have an MRA with contrast dye in all cases where a UCL tear is suspected.  I don't know the specifics, but every orthopedic surgeon I've talked to about this has indicated it is better than a standard MRI without dye.  Second, go to someone who is familiar with elbow injuries. Most orthopedic surgeons are not that familiar with a UCL tear or Tommy John surgery.  Third, your son is young, so you have time to treat it conservatively and see how he heals.  If conservative treatment does not heal him and he in fact does have a tear, there is plenty of time for him to have the surgery and recover in time for his varsity baseball a year or more away.

 

My own son had 2 MRIs.  The first was a standard MRI without contrast as our doctor didn't know any different.  Two separate orthopedic surgeons told us he needed an MRA with contrast, and he then got that.  Neither set of images showed any tear at all, but every surgeon we talked to said it was obviously torn after they examined him.  To make a long story a bit shorter, Dr. Kenneth Akizuki (SF Giants team surgeon and widely regarded as best elbow guy in Northern CA) operated on my son.  It turned out that his UCL was torn in 2 places.  There was an old, partial tear that he'd been playing with, having no pain at all.  The 2nd, newer tear was an avulsion that pulled away from the bone and caused the pain that led to surgery.  The surgery went great but you have to follow your physical therapy instructions to the letter.

 

Depending on where you live, get a referral to a quality orthopedic surgeon who has experience with elbows.  If you live in California, PM me and I'll be glad to put you in touch with Dr. Akizuki.  He's a great guy, and I'm seeing him on Monday for a problem with my knee that he's been helping me with.

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×