One of the most sensible pieces of advice I have heard in the recruiting process is to get objective evaluations of your kid from people who know what they are talking about. In other words, don't kid yourself about his abilities. If he is DIII in ability don't keep waiting for the major DI to come calling.
But what if the evaluations are all over the board? My son is a 2010 with an excellent bat (lefty, throws right though) whose other tools are average or below (7.2 sixty; low 80s thrower; developing power but only occasionally hits it out). In the last year he has heard this from very knowlegeable coaches/scouts:
1. Showcase coach who is a scout with MLB Souting Bureau - At first said he was a DII player, but after watching him hit for a summer said maybe mid-level DI.
2. Legion coach who has sent dozens of kids to college/pro ball and whose own son is in the majors - definite DI hitter but not sure if he is athletic enough to play at that level. Likes him as a corner infielder.
3. Mid-level DI recruiting coordinator - really likes his bat; thinks he is a corner outfielder
4. Major DI coach whose camp son attended - thinks he is a DIII player even though he said son performed very well.
5. DIII recruiting coordinator of an excellent program - likes my son as a pitcher more than a hitter.
So, you can see the dilemma. All five evaluators are experienced and respected, but there is no consensus as to my son's level or position. Of course this will all be sorted out by who actually offers him, but I'm curious if others have experienced this kind of variety from reliable experts?
Original Post