I've heard both opinions regarding myself after our league's fall championship game this weekend - just wondering what you all think...
I'm in S. Florida, and our rec program takes fall baseball pretty seriously - unlike most rational places on Earth. The regular season champ goes on to a TOC with other parks, there is a post season double elimination "playoff" - really just as competitive as the spring season.
I was lucky enough to coach the 12U regular season champs. I say lucky because it was a really good group of kids. A few former all stars, some former travel players who had families that were over the travel grind, and all of them really coach-able.
Anyway, we made our way to the "playoff championship" last Saturday. I decided that as a reward for the hard work that they had put in, that the players should be in charge for the game.
I let them set the lineup, the pitching rotation, coach the bases - everything. The parents and my fellow coaches thought I was out of my mind.
For the game, they set pretty much the same batting order I would have gone with, same defenses, and the same pitching. Basically, what had worked all season. The base coaching was a little on the aggressive side, but it scored us more runs than it cost us.
Most importantly to me, the players had a blast. They played a good game, and had fun doing it. I sat in the dugout once the plate meeting was over.
My wife said the general consensus in the stands had the moms loving the idea and the dads hating it.
What say the masses here? Good idea or bad? Something to do again, or let it go the way of the pet rock?
Does the fact that the players managed to win by 8 runs make a difference in the consideration?
Original Post