quote:
Again, this leaves out the moral/ethical aspects which I think are very important and shouldn't be excluded.
Having said this, and having been in this situation with our son 3 different times, I am completely on board with Beezer.
For us at least, the way this initially came about was his efforts to get any interest on the DI level and the only interest coming from a DIII coach. That coach consistently reinforced our son was a DI player, he couldn't understand why he was not being recruited, he expected DI's to recruit him at some point, and he was still going to recruit him and wanted him...and had a lot to offer.
Sure enough, at the end of July following his senior year, out comes a DI to watch him play. Goes 3-4 off a player later chosen in the 3rd round of the draft. Can't even get his jock off after the game before he hears the strongest of strong recruiting pitches.
Again, after his sophomore and junior years in college, while playing in a summer wood bat league, multiple DI opportunities were disclosed to him.
For a player who dreamed of playing at the DI level, this was very "heady" stuff. Personally, I think he handled it better than I did.
He never did leave the DIII program that recruited him so hard in the first place. His DIII coach always emphasized the importance of our son doing what was best for him, while trying to reassure that the DIII remained the best.
Personally, I think way to much emphasis can be placed on the player for morals/ethics. The DI coaches had absolutely no qualms recruiting our son knowing, initially, he had deposited at a DIII, and later knowing he attended a DIII. College recruiting is a very inexact "profession." As long as the player handles things with the DIII coach in ways that Beezer describes, I have absolutely no problems with the player forfeiting a deposit and moving to the DI. Not only does the NCAA permit it, the system almost encourages it.