Skip to main content

Here’s a typical “discussion” between a scorer and a coach.

Situation: Top of the 7th, game tied, bases loaded, 2-0 count on RH batter.

Batter hits routine grounder to 3rd. F5 fields ball, then attempts to get force at 3rd. R2, running on contact is called safe at 3rd.

I score the batter reaches on a FC, here’s what the coach says.

“You have XX(Batter) at 0-6 in game 2. I had him at 1-5. He only had 5 plate appearances, and I think you have to give him a hit on the groundball to 3B in 7th inning. You can't call it a fielders choice as YY(R2) beat the tag, and you can't call it an error (unless you give the E to the umpire who missed the call)”

There is no place in this world where I had the batter with 6 PA’s, even on the attachment I sent to the coach, but that’s only a minor thing, no harm no foul.

This is one of those instances where the coach simply doesn’t understand the rules. I explained why it can’t be a hit, but of course he’s the boss and I’ll change it if he says to do it. But, that doesn’t mean he’s right. Wink
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Curious - Why is the coach that wrapped up in the details of scoring? If I have my guess right you're giving him plenty of information to digest without that level of nitpicking.

I'd think he'd be more interesstd in the fact the pitcher got a ground ball with runners on 1st & 2nd. If the play was behind the 3B (playing in front of the bag) did anyone yell "Go to one" if he didn't have a play?
quote:
Originally posted by luv baseball:
Curious - Why is the coach that wrapped up in the details of scoring? If I have my guess right you're giving him plenty of information to digest without that level of nitpicking.


Sometimes its difficult to explain how this particular coach deals with such things without making it sound as though I think he’s some kind of jerk, which is definitely not the case. Let me start out by saying that for a fellow in his early 40’s, he’s one of the least tech-savvy people I know. Although he has a card on every batter and his pitchers for every game, he doesn’t put the information into any kind of data “gathering” software, even something as simple as spreadsheet or word processor. Everything is pencil and paper, which is a throwback to much earlier times. Nothing at all wrong with it, but what that does is act as something very limiting.

The biggest limiting thing about it is, the number of things he has to examine is really restricted. While as a kid I used to get a kick out of computing the BA and ERA for every one of the Indian’s players after every game, much beyond that was pretty much out of the question. The result is, he only cares about what he can verify with his cards, and that’s pretty much BA and ERA.

Over the last 6 years I’ve given him everything I could think of that might help him, and offered to track and provide him anything else he’d like to see. I’ve generated everything from scatter charts to detailed minutia, but he chooses to ignore everything other than his cards. I only come into the picture when its time to go to the annual meeting where the coaches choose all league players. Since he has no way to break data out using different criteria using software, in order to get totals for league only, that’s where I come in.

It doesn’t bother me though. I don’t do what I do to the degree I do it, for anyone other than myself. Its my hobby. I really believe there’s a lot of information being missed, but that’s not my worry.

quote:
I'd think he'd be more interesstd in the fact the pitcher got a ground ball with runners on 1st & 2nd. If the play was behind the 3B (playing in front of the bag) did anyone yell "Go to one" if he didn't have a play?


I don’t think you’re quite getting the full picture. Its truly a matter of perspective. There’s the perspective of someone who’s only concern is trying to put down on paper what’s taken place during a game, using the rules created over 150+ years of playing the game. Then there’s the perspective of a coach who feels he has to control every teeny aspect about everything, from mowing, chalking the lines, and watering down the IF dirt, to giving every offensive and defensive signal, while trying to remember what took place when he was coaching 3rd, then recording it on his cards by memory. I’m not saying a person couldn’t do all those things, but I am saying they couldn’t do all those things to the same degree of excellence.

Before he came to this school, he coached as another one up the road. He’s said many times that he only had one scorer during all that time, and I’ve talked to her on several occasions, both when he was still the coach there, and since he’s been gone. She did/does what I think is pretty typical at this level. She kept score, period. She’d get the scorebook before the game, then turn it in after, performing absolutely no duties as the statistician, not even calling in the score to the paper. And that’s fine. But if a coach wants someone to be the statistician, that person needs the book, and I don’t mean a few days later after the coach has “fixed” any problems he “feels” are in it.

Again, I’m not knocking coaches here, but there are dang few of them who know the scoring rules, and dang few of them who can control every facet of their team’s play, and still manage to keep an objective and accurate scoresheet. In the end, if a coach doesn’t believe in any numbers other than BA and ERA, there’s no a lot that can be done to help him. For me though, it makes no difference, because the numbers I generate, I generate as a hobby, and would like generate whether I was the team’s scorer or not. Wink
Last edited by Stats4Gnats
I was going deeper than the coach not knowing the scoring rules which was perfectly clear to trying to understand why he was focused on the stuff he was on.

If you have a guy worshiping the BA an and ERA then that lines things up pretty nicely. I'd expect almost all coaches don't care about statistics for the sake of knowing numbers but rather would have a few that they believe are key indicators of performance. I would expect ERA based on sound scoring would be one almost everyone would have interest in and offensively BA/OBP/Slg would probably be near the top of most lists. I think reasonable people can make valid arguements in favor of any of the individual numbers overall value.

Of course in HS the limiting factor is the number of opportunities. So coach keeping it simple might have merit.
quote:
Originally posted by luv baseball:
…If you have a guy worshiping the BA an and ERA then that lines things up pretty nicely. I'd expect almost all coaches don't care about statistics for the sake of knowing numbers but rather would have a few that they believe are key indicators of performance. I would expect ERA based on sound scoring would be one almost everyone would have interest in and offensively BA/OBP/Slg would probably be near the top of most lists. I think reasonable people can make valid arguements in favor of any of the individual numbers overall value.


Well, I’ll just say that it would be really nice if things were only that simple.

quote:
Of course in HS the limiting factor is the number of opportunities. So coach keeping it simple might have merit.


Heck, any system that produces more wins than losses has merit, and since we’re 115-52-3, this system definitely does that. All I’m saying is, I don’t care what the secret system is. What I care about is scoring a game by the rules, taking great care to try to produce numbers which are a valid as possible.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×