Originally Posted by PIS:
- Jemaz - kind of weird that you had film, etc for all 3 kids but you said they didn't "need" it. I'll repeat it again, film doesn't get kids signed. But it helps coaches really bare down on kids. It can help a coach figure out if a kid is worth driving 7 hours to go see. Or if they've seen a kid at a tourney w/ 1,000 other players film can be a helpful reminder of what that kid looks like. So it doesn't shock me that no coaches call and said "we want to offer your kid because of his film." Doesn't work like that."
PIS:
My oldest son played at Virginia Tech, where I graduated. He was recruited from Arizona first on the recommendation of the father of an older Little League teammate from Alexandria who was two years ahead of him at VT. VT expressed interest based on that recommendation, his high school program and the summer team for which he played. He went to a regular VT camp where he was outstanding and that sealed the deal.
My youngest son played at Arizona State. He was actively recruited by four other Pac 10 programs. He played for a top high school program, a top summer program, played for the Arizona team in the Sun Belt games, played for a team in Jupiter, played for the Reds team in the Area Code Games and went to one PG showcase and one Team One showcase (he did not play particularly well in either). He also played for the Rays Scout Team in the fall here in AZ (as did my other two sons). ASU's interest was driven mostly by his high school performance, his performance with his summer team (which faced some of the best competition to be found in the U.S.) and his performance in the fall scout league, which included the AZ Senior and Junior Classic. He also played extremely well in a late fall camp at ASU, which at the time was known as the Select 60.
He had video done at the PG event and by a top local service. It was excellent video but did not factor into his recruitment at all, as far as I know.
All that said, if my sons were going through this again, I would again have the video as well as an on-line resume because of the uncertainty inherent in much of the recruiting process. But I still don't think it does much and possibly could be a disservice. What I mean, once again, is that the most important factor is talent -- especially talent that fits a particular program. If a player is good enough, he will be recruited on his own merits and without a lot of extra stuff. If he manages to market himself to a program that is at a higher level than his actual skills, the experience will most likely be disappointing. (This is what I believe is most often described here as fit). If he gets the attention of a lower level program simply looking for players, the risk of a bad fit is also there. Nothing matches an in-person evaluation (especially if the coach gets to watch the player play under pressure against high level competition). This is why I don't favor showcases. I think they are too artificial. They are convenient and they bring together lots of players of similar ability, but I would choose Jupiter or the high level Connie Mack events first. I also like college camps where coaches get an extended look at a player in all kinds of situations, but it needs to be a camp where lots of other real prospects are present.
My nephew plays at Oberlin where he has had a remarkable career. He got the opportunity after attending a Headfirst Showcase, which was ideal in his particular situation. (He also was a great fit academically for this ultra competitive school). It is fun to watch all of these guys play. They play hard and put everything they have into it. If nearly any of them had managed an opportunity at the Pac 12 level, it probably would not have worked out nearly so well.
So what I think I am saying, use every tool to gain the opportunity, but in the end if your talent level does not determine what that opportunity is, it probably does not work out. If your talent is good enough, schools will find you. If it is not, you are likely to find out in a way that might not be so pleasant. This is part of the reason I am very happy my middle son went the more conventional route through college -- that of a regular student. Today, he is a graduate of the ASU Barrett Honors College and a graduate of the University of San Diego Law School and on Friday learned that he passed the California Bar Exam. Baseball is not for everyone. If fact at higher levels, it is for a select few. Just because a kid likes baseball a lot and works hard to play does not guarantee a real opportunity will ever exist.