Skip to main content

More scholarships for its women's programs, additional football scholarships, another full-time strength and conditioning coach, and eventually one more full-time assistant football coach are all among the intended benefits to Duquesne's athletic department in the wake of Monday's announcement that the university would eliminate four of its men's teams at the end of the school year.

"This is really not a cost-cutting measure," athletic director Greg Amodio said Thursday, breaking a weeklong administrative silence, "but a strategic reallocation of dollars."

Baseball, golf, swimming, and wrestling were the men's sports designated for termination in a financial review Amodio said was initiated by the athletic administration in 2008, a process that didn't receive approval by the university's hierarchy until late last month.

Though Duquesne had given no indication that Title IX considerations were the impetus for the overall review of its athletic programs, Amodio said yesterday Title IX implications were unavoidable.

"Frankly it's not something we can control; that's a federal mandate," Amodio said of the law that ensures equity for women's programs and scholarship dollars in intercollegiate athletics. "The new structure will be in long-term compliance with Title IX, for which we engaged an outside consultant, a nationally respected expert on Title IX issues and all of our initiatives have been approved."

Amodio, still the only Duquesne official to address the situation publicly, re-emphasized today that some 70 athletes in the four eliminated programs will not be penalized financially.



Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg...35.stm#ixzz0dy6yCibV
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Though Duquesne had given no indication that Title IX considerations were the impetus for the overall review of its athletic programs, Amodio said yesterday Title IX implications were unavoidable...

...70 athletes in the four eliminated programs will not be penalized financially.
Is he talking out both sides of his mouth? WOW GED10DaD
Last edited by GunEmDown10
GED10,

The main reason they don't mention Title IX in the offical response is because they can't. Due to a lot of negative press about it Congress updated the law and schools now can't mention Title IX compliance when they cancel mens' sports. Congress doesn't like getting the heat but of course in true Obama fashion they don't want to change course direction either.

So what you read on boards like this are comments about its not about Title IX but instead financial allocation stategery nonsense. The "see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil" monkees are alive and well as young men's baseball careers are being cut short due to social engineering.
quote:
Originally posted by igball:
The main reason they don't mention Title IX in the offical response is because they can't. Due to a lot of negative press about it Congress updated the law and schools now can't mention Title IX compliance when they cancel mens' sports.

Can you provide a link or better a reference to the actual law that supports this?

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×