quote:
Originally posted by freddy77:
quote:
Originally posted by lefthookdad:
Not entirely true freddy, some BBCOR bats have inserts inside the barrel to help the bat meet bbcor standards. I believe ove an extended period of time that integrity of these inserts will break down or weaken thus increasing the performance of the bat. Some bats have simply thickened the bat walls, which are less likely to "loosen" up or "Break in"
Lefthook,
College baseball messed up big-time a few years by allowing composites that improved beyond the rules after break-in.
Programs that swung those bats had a genuine advantage.
You maintain that certain types of BBCOR bats improve beyond the new rules. Assuming that you're correct, then it's amazing that all these smart college administrators are butt-stupid enough to once again have a truck-sized loophole in their bat regs.
I was just stating my opinion about the bats that have inserts or rings, or whatever the company calls it, stand a far greater chance of either the ring or insert shifting, deteriorating or simply failing. Composites bats went through this in mens softball. I have seen bats opened and the inserts removed. I have seen bats that the rings have failed to maintain integrity over an extended period of time.
With the BBCOR bats have we seen any testing of the first batch of BBCOR bats (post ABI) that have this type of design in use to see if they still test within specs?
They may very well hold thier integrity to standards, I don't know and I don't know of anyone who has looked back at the original models to see.