quote:
Originally posted by powertoallfields:
Because it puts too much gray area into play for the Umpires. I don't see how it would put the Defense at a disadvantage. The Pitcher can still attempt to pick-off the runner at third or first. IMO, it should be no different than a normal pick-off to first base. I think the current rule gives an advantage to the defense because the runner can't go on first movement by a RHPs front foot.
I know of no umpires who have an issue with the move...just runners who get picked and their coaches.
Despite the myth perpetuated by coaches, running on the first move of the front foot is not always a safe thing to do. RH pitchers can, by rule, step and throw to first without disengaging.
quote:
I am asking about High School rules by the way. Let me ask you this, can a LHP in the same situation fake a throw to first and then turn to look at third?
Only if he disengages first. Throws to first,for good reason, under all codes, is treated differently than the other bases.
quote:
IMO, the Pitcher should have to throw to third if he moves to third and throw to first if he moves to first if he does it with his foot in contact with the rubber.
Your opinion is in direct disagreement with the rules and tradition of baseball...kind of like disagreeing with 3 strikes for an out when it takes 4 balls for a walk.