Skip to main content

From the AP:

BRISTOL, CONN. — Peter Gammons is leaving ESPN after the winter meetings.

Gammons joined ESPN in 1989 and has been an integral part of its baseball coverage since. He wrote for the Boston Globe starting in 1969 and also worked for Sports Illustrated (1976-78, 1986-90).

The 64-year-old Gammons received the 2004 J.G. Taylor Spink Award for outstanding baseball writing and was honored during the 2005 Hall of Fame induction ceremony. He signed in October with Creative Artists Agency.



I think this is bad for ESPN. Gammons really knows his stuff. Wonder what he's going to do?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Is it bad for ESPN or did we just grow up as Peter Gammons being a way of life for a Red Sox fan? Over the past few years he's developed a reputation as being so overagressive on rumors he's the guy the agents use to pass false information to escalate negotiating power for their free agents.
I wish Peter well and hope he continues doing what he does in some form or fashion. Imo he is the best at what he does and I just really like the guy. And he is just a very nice person. My sons college program got a very nice donation from Peter when they were building their new facility. Every player had to call the people that made donations and personally thank them. My son was lucky enough to get Mr Gammons. Peter stayed on the phone for over 30 minutes just talking baseball with my son.

There are some guys that you enjoy listening to talk about the game. Peter for me is one of those guys. I wish him well in what ever he decides to do.
There's a lot to love about the MLB Network, especially for us baseball junkies looking for an off-season fix. Lately I've been watching "The Pen" in reruns, and I can't believe I missed it the first time. Really a fun watch. So are the "All Time Games" and such.

But to be honest, the MLB Network highlights show is just too much. I actually prefer Baseball Tonight as a way to get a highlight reel in a reasonable amount of time. If I want to sit in front of the tube for 3+ hours, I'd rather just watch a game start to finish, instead of doing the ADD thing and jumping from game to game.

In the end, the commentators know enough about free agency to know how to go to the highest bidder when their contracts are up. I suspect things like money, working hours and studio location (how far is the commute?) would be what Gammons would care about at this point in his life.
quote:
Originally posted by TRhit:
Have you noticed how many aspects of MLBTV that ESPN has been trying to dupicate ???


Well, they hired Harold Reynolds. Maybe they will get Steve Phillips now.

MLB Network suits Gammons well. They go on and on and on. I've seen them interview some former player I've never heard of, about nothing for 30 minutes.

Gammons can go into minute detail about pending multi-team deals that might never happen, and usually don't. There is a market for that (from junkies). I just don't have the time or patience for it.
Last edited by Dad04

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×